Batman villain Clayface gets an origin story, plus other new movies to watch this week
This article provides a review of Taika Waititi's film adaptation of Kazuo Ishiguro's novel 'Klara and the Sun.' The piece describes the movie as potentially annoying yet emotionally moving, noting that it follows the tradition of restrained British storytelling while incorporating Waititi's characteristic deadpan humor and corny gags. The plot centers on an android named Klara, played by Jenna Ortega, who becomes a companion to a sickly teenage girl named Josie in a near-future setting following World War III. Although the story takes place in a post-internet era, the reviewer notes that the narrative focuses on human relationships rather than technological themes or contemporary AI realities. The review highlights Ortega's energetic performance as a central strength of the film, comparing it to classic silent cinema archetypes, while acknowledging that the director's fragmented visual style may not appeal to all viewers.
Taika Waititi’s adaptation of Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2021 novel, Klara and the Sun, is currently showing in cinemas. The film runs for 117 minutes and carries a maturity rating of M. It stars Jenna Ortega as an android companion designed to befriend a teenage girl. The narrative draws from the source material, which is described as a British tearjerker where characters maintain composure under pressure. This literary tradition aligns with Ishiguro’s previous works, including The Remains of the Day and Never Let Me Go, both of which were previously adapted to screen with notable restraint. The screenplay, written by Waititi and Dahvi Waller, streamlines the novel's plot while incorporating specific comedic elements. These include allusions to Grease and Star Wars. Certain dialogue lines that appear distinctly Hollywood in tone are actually taken directly from the book. The core concept involves telling the story through the perspective of a pure-hearted naive character. The setting is a vaguely imagined near future situated sometime after World War III. In this society, the war has not caused visible societal disruption beyond the termination of the internet, a detail noted as convenient for plot progression. Jenna Ortega portrays Klara, an android who functions as a blank slate intended to have her personality molded to suit her human companion. Her owner is Josie, played by Mia Tharia, a wealthy, lonely, and sickly teenager. Josie possesses genius-level intelligence resulting from a dubious medical procedure referred to as lifting. While the story ostensibly deals with technology, the review notes it has little connection to the current reality of artificial intelligence. Klara exhibits traditional cinematic android traits, such as jerky eye movements and an unnaturally smooth gait. However, Ortega’s performance is described as energetic from the moment the character appears as a living mannequin in a shop window, powered by sunlight. Ortega’s acting style is characterized as a full-on clown performance. This approach traces a lineage through Giulietta Masina in La Strada to the wide-eyed child-women popular in 1920s silent cinema. Viewer reaction to this performance is polarized, falling into two categories: those who find the character charming and those who wish for the android to be dismantled immediately. The reviewer expressed being charmed by the performance. This sentiment explains why Josie insists on taking Klara home despite the skepticism of her mother, Chrissie, played by Amy Adams. Chrissie prefers a more advanced model, but Josie rejects this option. The film employs a visual style described as wilfully cluttered and fragmentary. Directors utilize lens flares and pixelated imagery to approximate Klara’s partial and aggressively sunny point of view. While this technique succeeds occasionally, the execution lacks a firm directorial hand. One particularly criticized sequence involves Josie meeting a group of other lifted children her own age. These characters are depicted as a pack of lisping, screeching snobs. Another emotionally manipulative scene occurs when Chrissie discovers that Klara has learned to mimic Josie’s movements with precision. Despite the manipulation, the reviewer acknowledged being moved by the interaction between Adams and Ortega in that moment. Critics describe the film as uncommonly annoying by sensible standards, yet capable of inducing tears. The sadness inherent in the story stems from the emotional weight of the original novel. Waititi’s direction is noted for lacking restraint, favoring a form of deadpan comedy where characters seem to explicitly signal their deadpan nature. The film contrasts sharply with the restrained adaptations of Ishiguro’s earlier novels. The production is distributed by Sony Pictures. The movie is available for viewing in theaters now. The narrative focuses on the relationship between the android and the ill teen, set against a backdrop of a post-war society where digital connectivity has ceased. The interplay between the android’s solar-powered existence and the human family dynamics forms the central conflict of the piece.
2 reports
The AgeIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 405 hr. ago
This article provides a review of Taika Waititi's film adaptation of Kazuo Ishiguro's novel 'Klara and the Sun.' The piece describes the movie as potentially annoying yet emotionally moving, noting that it follows the tradition of restrained British storytelling while incorporating Waititi's characteristic deadpan humor and corny gags. The plot centers on an android named Klara, played by Jenna Ortega, who becomes a companion to a sickly teenage girl named Josie in a near-future setting following World War III. Although the story takes place in a post-internet era, the reviewer notes that the narrative focuses on human relationships rather than technological themes or contemporary AI realities. The review highlights Ortega's energetic performance as a central strength of the film, comparing it to classic silent cinema archetypes, while acknowledging that the director's fragmented visual style may not appeal to all viewers.
Bias read (Center): The article is a cultural review of a motion picture. It discusses artistic choices, acting performances, and narrative structure without engaging in political debate, policy analysis, or partisan commentary. As apolitical entertainment content, it carries no inherent political charge.
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (40): Highly subjective and critical tone. Uses pejorative descriptors like 'uncommonly annoying' and 'wilfully corny.' While framed as a review, the heavy injection of personal disdain makes it far from neutral.
The Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 405 hr. ago
This article provides a critical review of Taika Waititi's film adaptation of Kazuo Ishiguro's novel 'Klara and the Sun.' The piece describes the movie as potentially annoying yet emotionally moving, noting that it follows the author's tradition of restrained storytelling despite Waititi's typically exuberant directorial style. The plot centers on an android named Klara, played by Jenna Ortega, who becomes a companion to a sickly teenager named Josie in a post-apocalyptic near-future setting. The reviewer highlights that while the film features stylized android movements and comedic elements, it ultimately focuses on emotional connection rather than technological realism. The review concludes that the performance is charming and effective, though the fragmented visual style may divide audiences.
Bias read (Center): The article is a cultural critique of a motion picture. It evaluates artistic choices, acting performances, and narrative structure without engaging in political debate, partisan advocacy, or policy analysis. As a piece of entertainment journalism focused on film criticism, it carries no inherent政治偏
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (40): Identical text to Article 0. The presentation is heavily slanted toward a negative opinion, utilizing emotionally charged and dismissive language rather than objective description.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.