ON
← Back to feed
It only took a few minutes and today Viola would be with us: the grief of Marina Piller, the former skier compensated with 800 thousand euros for the death of her newborn daughter
Italy🏛️ PoliticsProgressive15 hr. ago

It only took a few minutes and today Viola would be with us: the grief of Marina Piller, the former skier compensated with 800 thousand euros for the death of her newborn daughter

Marina Piller, ex sciatrice italiana, racconta il dramma della morte della sua figlia neonata Viola durante il parto nel 2019 all’ospedale di Tolmezzo. Sette anni dopo, il Tribunale civile ha condannato l’Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale a versare un risarcimento di oltre 800mila euro. La famiglia intende utilizzare i fondi per iniziative benefiche, ma non ha ancora deciso a chi destinarli. Piller sostiene che un intervento tempestivo, come un taglio cesareo, avrebbe potuto salvare la vita di Viola. Le consulenze tecniche hanno indicato che tra i primi segnali di sofferenza fetale e il parto sono passati 114 minuti senza intervento. La famiglia non ha ricevuto scuse dal personale sanitario coinvolto, che durante il processo ha descritto la morte come 'bianca'. La vicenda è stata archiviata sul fronte penale.

Marina Piller, a former Italian cross-country skier, has received over 800,000 euros in compensation from the Friuli Central University Health Authority after her newborn daughter, Viola, died during childbirth in July 2019. The family is still deciding how to use the funds, though they hope it will help others in need and prevent similar tragedies. The incident occurred at Tolmezzo Hospital in Udine province, and the court found the health authority responsible for the death. The ruling came after years of legal proceedings, with Piller expressing deep sorrow and frustration over the lack of adequate care during the critical moments before her daughter's death. The tragedy unfolded on the night of July 10, 2019, when Viola, born prematurely, suffered respiratory distress and ultimately passed away. According to technical assessments presented during the civil trial, the delay in performing a caesarean section could have saved her life. Piller recounted the journey from their home in Sappada to Tolmezzo and emphasized that had medical staff acted more quickly, Viola would still be alive today. She described how her daughter endured suffering from 3:44 AM to 5:38 AM, yet no interventions were made during this time. Piller, who is now 42, shared that she has tried to move forward while keeping the memory of Viola close. She mentioned having another child at the time of the incident and later giving birth to two more children, which makes her feel she has four children rather than three. Despite the passage of time, the pain remains sharp, especially because she believes the available resources and knowledge in 2019 should have allowed for better care. She expressed disappointment that the level of treatment she received was akin to what her grandmother might have received 80 years ago. The absence of an apology or acknowledgment from the medical personnel involved has added to her grief. Piller noted that she never received an explanation or even a word of sympathy from those present during the event, only encountering them again during the trial, where they claimed the death was unavoidable. On the criminal side, however, the case was dismissed by the judge in Udine, and Piller decided not to contest the decision, despite feeling that further investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident would have been beneficial. The legal process has brought some closure, but the emotional scars remain. Piller continues to seek ways to honor her daughter’s memory through charitable efforts, hoping that the compensation will serve a greater purpose beyond personal healing. Her story highlights the ongoing debate around healthcare standards and accountability, particularly in emergency situations involving maternal and fetal well-being. As she looks ahead, Piller remains focused on ensuring that the lessons learned from this tragedy can lead to meaningful change in the future.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7015 hr. ago
It only took a few minutes and today Viola would be with us: the grief of Marina Piller, the former skier compensated with 800 thousand euros for the death of her newborn daughter

Marina Piller, ex sciatrice italiana, racconta il dramma della morte della sua figlia neonata Viola durante il parto nel 2019 all’ospedale di Tolmezzo. Sette anni dopo, il Tribunale civile ha condannato l’Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale a versare un risarcimento di oltre 800mila euro. La famiglia intende utilizzare i fondi per iniziative benefiche, ma non ha ancora deciso a chi destinarli. Piller sostiene che un intervento tempestivo, come un taglio cesareo, avrebbe potuto salvare la vita di Viola. Le consulenze tecniche hanno indicato che tra i primi segnali di sofferenza fetale e il parto sono passati 114 minuti senza intervento. La famiglia non ha ricevuto scuse dal personale sanitario coinvolto, che durante il processo ha descritto la morte come 'bianca'. La vicenda è stata archiviata sul fronte penale.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the case as a failure of medical care and systemic neglect, emphasizing the emotional impact on the family and suggesting institutional shortcomings. The focus on the inadequacy of healthcare standards and the lack of accountability leans toward a critical view of institutional ap

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a legal case where the hospital was found liable for the death of a newborn during childbirth. It cites specific dates, locations, and financial compensation figures, aligning with the cross-source consensus. The details about the medical procedures and expert findings are con

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the story from the perspective of the victim’s family, emphasizing their emotional experience and the potential preventability of the tragedy. While factual information is presented, there is a clear focus on the human impact, which can be seen as emotionally charged rather than

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories