Saborski zastupnik Možemo Damir Bakić kritikuje desničarske i HDZ-političare za šovinističke i antisrpske izjave u Hrvatskom saboru, posebno uzetih u raspravi o javnom zdravstvu. Bakić navodi primjere poput korištenja imena Milutin i Radojka kao simbola Srpa, te premlaćivanja književnika Vladimira Arsenijevića i plakata koji veličaju Ratka Mladića. Kritizira se i premijer Andrej Plenković za šutnju na takve izjave, a Bakić opominje da takvi slučajevi postaju sve češći i da to predstavlja šovinistički govor mržnje. Uz to, Bakić uspoređuje takvo ponašanje s grafitima protiv Srba i tvrdi da takvi političari potiču i ohrabruju takav stil.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a growing acceptance of hate speech and nationalism within the parliament, which aligns with left-wing critiques of rising nationalist sentiment. The language used by Bakić emphasizes the normalization of anti-Serb rhetoric and calls for accountability, reflecting a左翼
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on Bakić's public criticism of HDZ and the right-wing parties for what he describes as 'unforgivable nationalist and anti-Serb statements' in the Croatian Parliament. It provides context about the recent debate on public health and references specific incidents like th
Why objectivity (65): The tone of the article leans towards supporting Bakić's perspective, using emotionally charged language such as 'ultimativni argument' and 'šovinistički govor mržnje.' While it presents Bakić's arguments clearly, it frames them as justified criticisms rather than presenting alternative viewpoints o





