Feijóo, on Ayuso's attic: Patrimonio de Madrid must explain why it bought a space that cannot be used as an office
Alberto Núñez Feijóo, líder del Partido Popular (PP), ha criticado públicamente la compra de un ático en Chamberí por parte del gobierno madrileño liderado por Isabel Díaz Ayuso. La operación, valorada en 6,3 millones de euros, fue revelada por EL PAÍS y generó controversia debido a que el inmueble no está permitido para uso comercial. Feijóo cuestiona la transparencia del gobierno regional, afirmando que el Ejecutivo madrileño buscaba un espacio temporal para trasladar funciones gubernamentales durante obras en la Real Casa de Correos. El gobierno de Ayuso justificó la venta del ático por 6,7 millones de euros para financiar la reconstrucción de la Sierra Oeste tras incendios. Fuentes indican que la compra no figura en registros de transparencia ni en las cuentas anuales de Planifica Madrid, lo que ha generado desconfianza sobre la legalidad y motivación detrás de la operación.
Isabel Díaz Ayuso has appointed three former presidents of the Community of Madrid, Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón, Esperanza Aguirre, and Cristina Cifuentes, as advisory members of the Regional Legal Advisory Commission. The move allows these individuals, all affiliated with the Popular Party (PP), to potentially earn tens of thousands of euros annually through attendance fees for meetings of this body. Each member will receive 750 euros net per session they attend. According to the annual report of the commission’s plenary sessions in 2025, which held 45 meetings, each of these former leaders could have earned up to 33,750 euros net annually had they attended all sessions. Combined, their potential earnings would exceed 100,000 euros. The appointment marks a reversal of policy following Cifuentes' dissolution of the regional advisory council in 2015, which previously allowed ex-presidents to draw public funds. Ayuso introduced the possibility of such compensation by approving the statute for former regional presidents in 2025. These three politicians were named to the commission at the end of July. If they are called to four plenary sessions per month and attend them, they would earn 3,000 euros net per month. A spokesperson for the Presidency Council, led by Miguel Ángel García Martín, explained that the stipends depend on the number of plenary sessions attended. “If they don’t attend, they won’t get anything,” the spokesperson added, noting that absences could result from incompatibility or personal reasons. The stipend is incompatible with post-tenure compensation and other public remuneration. Originally, the government proposed lower payments for advisory members. Public documents reviewed by El País indicate that the initial proposal suggested a maximum payment of 459 euros per session for members of the Regional Legal Advisory Commission. However, the final decision increased this amount by 291 euros, bringing it to 750 euros per session, a 63 percent increase. Membership in the advisory body, including the stipend, can last a maximum of six years from the date of appointment. For former presidents who served more than four years in office, the term can be extended to twelve years. This condition applies to Leguina, Gallardón, Aguirre, and future President Ayuso. According to an insider familiar with internal administrative procedures, it makes sense for former officials with extensive experience to contribute their institutional insights while receiving compensation. “In the Council of State, former presidents are members and nothing happens,” the source noted. In 2025, the commission held 45 plenary sessions, compared to 43 in both 2024 and 2023. Had the former presidents attended all these sessions, they would have earned over 33,000 euros annually, surpassing 90,000 euros in a three-year period. To qualify for the position, former regional presidents must apply and meet two conditions: having held office for at least two years and assuming the role at the beginning of a legislative term. This provision excludes former presidents Ignacio González, who faces legal issues related to the Lezo case, and Ángel Garrido, who clashed with Ayuso after switching to Citizens. Pedro Rollán, currently serving as president of the Senate, is also ineligible for membership in the commission. Similarly, Joaquín Leguina, a former PSOE president and current head of the Court of Auditors, cannot join due to his current role. Former members of the advisory council, which was dissolved in 2015, received 8,500 euros gross monthly (5,500 net), along with official cars and assistants. When Díaz Ayuso took office, she did not restore this system, instead introducing a new framework for former officials. The exact financial implications of her appointments remain under scrutiny, particularly given the high potential earnings and the political context surrounding the selection of these individuals.
Go to the primary sources (5)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Alberto Núñez Feijóo, líder del Partido Popular (PP), ha criticado públicamente la compra de un ático en Chamberí por parte del gobierno madrileño liderado por Isabel Díaz Ayuso. La operación, valorada en 6,3 millones de euros, fue revelada por EL PAÍS y generó controversia debido a que el inmueble no está permitido para uso comercial. Feijóo cuestiona la transparencia del gobierno regional, afirmando que el Ejecutivo madrileño buscaba un espacio temporal para trasladar funciones gubernamentales durante obras en la Real Casa de Correos. El gobierno de Ayuso justificó la venta del ático por 6,7 millones de euros para financiar la reconstrucción de la Sierra Oeste tras incendios. Fuentes indican que la compra no figura en registros de transparencia ni en las cuentas anuales de Planifica Madrid, lo que ha generado desconfianza sobre la legalidad y motivación detrás de la operación.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the purchase of the attic by the Madrid regional government as a potential misuse of public funds and questions the transparency and legality of the transaction. The tone suggests skepticism toward the ruling party (Popular Party) and highlights concerns over accountability, which
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about Feijóo’s comments regarding the purchase of the apartment by the Madrid government, citing his interview with Europa Press and referencing El País as the source of the controversy. The information aligns with the general consensus found in other articles c
Why objectivity (80): The article presents Feijóo’s statements in a relatively neutral manner, quoting him directly and providing background from the interview. However, there is a slight emphasis on Feijóo’s perspective without counterpoints from the Madrid government, which could slightly affect balance.
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 658/21/2026
The article reports that former Madrid regional leaders Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón, Esperanza Aguirre, and Cristina Cifuentes have been appointed as 'vocales electivos' to the Madrid Community's Legal Advisory Commission by Governor Isabel Díaz Ayuso. These appointments allow them to potentially earn up to €33,750 annually if they attend all meetings, which pay €750 per session. The decision was made after the approval of a statute for former presidents in 2025, allowing them to receive compensation for their participation. Previously, such payments were suspended since 2015 when Cifuentes dissolved the advisory council. The initial proposal suggested lower payments, but the final amount was increased by 63%. The article notes that this arrangement is limited to six years, extendable to twelve for those who served over four years.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the appointment and financial implications of former politicians without overtly criticizing or praising the decision. It provides factual information about the legal framework, payment structure, and historical context, while avoiding strong ideological language. The tone is ap
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the appointment of former presidents by Ayuso and the financial implications, citing specific figures like 750 euros per meeting and potential earnings of over 100,000 euros. It references the 2025 statute and mentions the dissolution of the council by
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the facts but uses somewhat emotive language such as 'decenas de miles de euros' and implies potential controversy through phrases like 'superando los 100.000 euros de gasto conjunto'. While not overtly biased, it frames the situation in a way that suggests public concern about
El ConfidencialIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 30Objective 408/21/2026
The article argues that Spain requires a stable government rather than a fragmented group holding power. It criticizes the current political situation, suggesting that the country is suffering from a lack of unified leadership. The piece implies that the existing political landscape resembles a 'tribe' rather than a cohesive governing body, which is hindering effective governance. This perspective highlights concerns over political instability and calls for a more centralized approach to leadership.
Bias read (Conservative): The article uses strong, critical language toward the current political structure, implying dysfunction and fragmentation. The term 'tribu en el poder' suggests a derogatory view of the current ruling groups, aligning with a conservative critique of leftist or fragmented governance. The framing of '
Why factuality (30): This article is extremely brief and lacks substantive content. It only states the headline 'España necesita un gobierno, no una tribu en el poder' without providing any supporting details, context, or sources. It does not relate directly to the main event described in the first article.
Why objectivity (40): The article is highly subjective and lacks neutrality. The phrase 'una tribu en el poder' implies a strong political bias against certain groups or parties, suggesting a clear ideological stance rather than presenting balanced information.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Spain
