ON
← Back to feed
I had the credit for the final, but FIFA took everything away from me: the complaint of journalist Filippo Maria Ricci, excluded from Spain-Argentina
Italy🏛️ PoliticsProgressive19 days ago

I had the credit for the final, but FIFA took everything away from me: the complaint of journalist Filippo Maria Ricci, excluded from Spain-Argentina

Filippo Maria Ricci, inviato della Gazzetta dello Sport alla Coppa del Mondo 2026, ha annunciato di essere stato privato dell'accredito per assistere alla finale tra Spagna e Argentina. Aveva seguito tutte le partite dal vivo e aveva i biglietti per la finale, ma poco dopo è stato rimosso dall'evento. La FIFA ha spiegato che la decisione dipende dalla disponibilità di posti, ma molti colleghi sospettano una punizione per le critiche recenti del giornalista all'organizzazione dei Mondiali. Altri media, come Il Corriere e La Repubblica, hanno mantenuto i loro accrediti. Ricci ha espresso sentimenti di ingiustizia e disappunto, con supporto da parte di altri giornalisti. La situazione potrebbe generare ulteriore dibattito prima della finale.

Filippo Maria Ricci, a correspondent for La Gazzetta dello Sport based in Spain, has accused the International Football Federation (FIFA) of abruptly revoking his accreditation for the final match between Spain and Argentina, scheduled for this evening in New York. The journalist had covered all 11 games live during the World Cup, but will not be present in the press area for the concluding match. On Monday morning, Ricci posted on X stating, “It’s over. After 38 days, 11 matches followed live, and 165 articles for the Gazzetta, my World Cup ends abruptly and unexpectedly just before the final.” Ricci claimed he had received the ticket for the final, access to the mixed zone, and parking privileges earlier that day. However, these were revoked shortly afterward. He noted that the FIFA had stated the issue was related to the availability of seats, though he expressed skepticism. “The Gazzetta went from five approved credentials to two; Corriere della Sera maintained all five, while Repubblica kept all three,” he wrote. Ricci is unsure whether there are other reasons behind the reduction in their accreditation numbers, but he feels certain that his World Cup ended in the worst possible way with a sense of injustice. Colleagues have expressed solidarity with Ricci on social media following the incident. At La Gazzetta dello Sport, three of the five accreditments for the final were withdrawn, raising suspicions that FIFA may have retaliated against the newspaper for its recent criticisms of the tournament’s organization. A colleague, Davide Chinellato, wrote on X, “What a shame! A respected media outlet like La Gazzetta dello Sport, for which FIFA President Gianni Infantino once wrote an article at the beginning of this long World Cup, now finds itself stripped of three credentials for the final after criticizing what didn’t work. Has football become a tyranny?” The suspicion of retaliation is further fueled by Ricci’s recent articles, which included justified critiques of the World Cup’s organization and the numerous issues that have plagued the latter stages of the competition. Among his latest pieces were titles such as “From Vargentina to ArgenFifa: Infantino and the accusations of favoritism toward Messi and the Albiceleste,” “In the end, no fans together with journalists. But the press conferences of Spain and Argentina turn into shows,” and “The last of Infantino? Paid press conferences. And for $150, a selfie with Rio Ferdinand…” For now, the official explanation from FIFA attributes the withdrawal of the credentials to a lack of available seating. This reasoning has not convinced many colleagues, who believe that the harsh criticism published in recent weeks might have influenced the decision. Without further clarification from the international federation, the situation risks turning into another controversy ahead of the World Cup final. The case highlights ongoing tensions between media organizations and FIFA, particularly regarding access and editorial freedom. As the final approaches, the situation remains unresolved, leaving Ricci and his colleagues uncertain about the future of their coverage. The outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for how media outlets are treated in future major sporting events.

1 reports

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentProgressiveFactual 94Objective 9219 days ago
I had the credit for the final, but FIFA took everything away from me: the complaint of journalist Filippo Maria Ricci, excluded from Spain-Argentina

Filippo Maria Ricci, inviato della Gazzetta dello Sport alla Coppa del Mondo 2026, ha annunciato di essere stato privato dell'accredito per assistere alla finale tra Spagna e Argentina. Aveva seguito tutte le partite dal vivo e aveva i biglietti per la finale, ma poco dopo è stato rimosso dall'evento. La FIFA ha spiegato che la decisione dipende dalla disponibilità di posti, ma molti colleghi sospettano una punizione per le critiche recenti del giornalista all'organizzazione dei Mondiali. Altri media, come Il Corriere e La Repubblica, hanno mantenuto i loro accrediti. Ricci ha espresso sentimenti di ingiustizia e disappunto, con supporto da parte di altri giornalisti. La situazione potrebbe generare ulteriore dibattito prima della finale.

Bias read (Progressive): L'article frames the situation as a potential retaliation by the FIFA against critical journalism, suggesting a conflict between media freedom and institutional power. The tone leans toward criticizing the FIFA's actions and highlighting the suppression of journalistic independence, which aligns với

Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports Filippo Maria Ricci’s claim that his accreditation was revoked by FIFA for the final match, citing his social media statement and the reduction of La Gazzetta dello Sport’s credentials from five to two. It also mentions that other outlets like Corriere and Repubblica r

Why objectivity (92): The article presents the situation largely neutrally, quoting Ricci’s statements and noting the discrepancy between different media outlets. However, the rhetorical question 'Il calcio è diventato una tirannia?' introduces a subtle tone of criticism toward FIFA, slightly affecting neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories