Australia is currently grappling with a surge in online hate speech, particularly antisemitic rhetoric, according to recent testimonies before the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. The commission, now in its third week of public hearings, has been examining the extent of online hostility and the challenges faced by authorities in addressing it. Witnesses, including prominent Jewish Australians, have described the severe impact of such abuse on their lives and the broader community.
Over the past week, the inquiry has heard from Jewish Australians detailing the effects of online antisemitism and misinformation. Among these testimonies was that of Sarah Schwartz, director of the Jewish Council of Australia. Schwartz recounted experiencing online abuse for her pro-Palestinian advocacy, with critics labeling her a "traitor." She highlighted how political manipulation of incidents, such as the Bondi shooting, has led to the scapegoating of Palestinian and Muslim communities, sending a harmful message that these groups must bear the brunt of antisemitic scrutiny.
Schwartz emphasized that while the Jewish Council rejects antisemitism, they argue that criticism of Israel—particularly its government's actions—is not equivalent to antisemitism. This distinction has sparked significant debate, especially given the influence of certain media outlets in shaping public discourse. The Jewish Council represents a diverse group of Jewish professionals, including academics, lawyers, writers, and educators, who advocate for a more nuanced understanding of Israel's role in the region.
Another notable witness was Tahli Blicblau, CEO of the Dor Foundation. Blicblau reported instances of antisemitic comments, such as suggestions that disused oil refineries should be repurposed as "makeshift concentration camps," which continued to circulate despite repeated reports. Alongside Jewish Labor MP Josh Burns, Blicblau advocated for enhanced safety measures on social media platforms. Burns criticized the "us and them" narrative that portrays all Jewish Australians as loyal to Israel and its actions in Gaza, emphasizing that such rhetoric leads to real-world consequences, including physical attacks.
Burns recounted an incident in June 2024 where his workplace was attacked, highlighting the tangible dangers posed by online hostility. He also mentioned the abuse faced by his non-Jewish partner, Georgie Purcell, noting the additional layer of misogyny in the harassment. These accounts underscore the complex and multifaceted nature of the issue, affecting not only Jewish individuals but also their families and partners.
Steven Lowy, a former executive of Westpac and son of billionaire Frank Lowy, testified about the extensive online threats he and his family have encountered. Lowy noted that approximately 40 individuals had been referred to police, and over 1,500 posts had been flagged within a four-week period. His testimony called for expanded police powers across all states to better protect Jewish Australians and their communities.
The inquiry has also heard from survivors of the Bondi massacre, who described the spread of conspiracy theories and the hostile environment that followed the tragic event. These testimonies reflect a broader pattern of online hostility, fueled by political polarization and the lack of regulation on social media platforms.
As the royal commission continues its investigations, there is growing pressure on lawmakers and policymakers to address the root causes of online hate speech and implement effective regulatory frameworks. The ongoing discussions highlight the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to safeguard vulnerable communities and promote a safer digital landscape.
4 reports
SBS NewsState / PublicLeft21 hr. agoThe Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has heard concerns about rising online hate speech and antisemitism in Australia, with Jewish representatives sharing personal experiences of targeted abuse. Testimonies highlighted issues such as political manipulation of incidents like the Bondi shooting to scapegoat Palestinian and Muslim communities, and harmful comments like suggesting repurposing oil refineries as 'makeshift concentration camps.' Jewish leaders emphasized that criticism of Israeli policies is distinct from antisemitism, while Labor MP Josh Burns described the emergence of an 'us and them' narrative online that falsely equates Jewish Australians with support for Israeli actions in Gaza. He linked this rhetoric to real-world attacks, including an incident at his workplace in June 2024 and misogynistic abuse faced by his non-Jewish partner.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue through the lens of Jewish advocacy and critiques of Israeli policies, emphasizing the distinction between legitimate criticism and antisemitism. It highlights concerns raised by Jewish leaders and politicians who argue that online rhetoric has contributed to real-world,
The Conversation (AU)IndependentLeftyesterdayThe article discusses the role of News Corporation in shaping media narratives around Israel and its impact on individuals like Sarah Schwartz, a Jewish lawyer who criticizes Israel's actions in Gaza. The piece highlights how News Corporation's pro-Israel stance influences both international and domestic coverage, often leading to the vilification of critics through accusations of antisemitism. Schwartz co-founded the Jewish Council of Australia, a group advocating for a more nuanced view of Israel's policies. News outlets initially dismissed the group but intensified their attacks after Schwartz participated in a controversial event titled 'The Greatest Race Debate,' where she was portrayed negatively. The article argues that News Corporation's consistent support for Israel leads to biased reporting and personal attacks on those who challenge its narrative.
Bias read (Left): The article frames News Corporation's pro-Israel stance as hypocritical and biased, highlighting its suppression of dissenting voices like Sarah Schwartz. It critiques the media outlet's influence on public discourse and its tendency to label critics as antisemitic, aligning with left-leaning views.
The AgeIndependentCenteryesterdayA prominent Jewish human rights lawyer, Sarah Schwartz from the Jewish Council, testified before the royal commission investigating antisemitism. The commission is examining issues related to antisemitic incidents and their impact on the community. Schwartz's testimony is part of the ongoing inquiry into the prevalence and nature of antisemitism in Australia. The hearing aims to gather evidence and perspectives from various stakeholders to inform potential recommendations. This development highlights the growing concern over antisemitism and the government's efforts to address it through formal investigations.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal professional testifying before a royal commission, which is a formal governmental process. The framing is neutral, focusing on the fact that a prominent figure is providing input to an official investigation. There is no evident bias in the language or emphasis, and it
The Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenteryesterdayThe Sydney Morning Herald reported that prominent Jewish human rights lawyer Sarah Schwartz testified before the royal commission investigating antisemitism. Schwartz, representing the Jewish Council, provided testimony during the commission's proceedings. The report highlights her role in addressing issues related to antisemitism, though specific details of her testimony were not elaborated upon in the excerpt. The article was published on July 2, 2026, and includes standard publication elements such as advertisements and links to other services.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a legal professional testifying at a royal commission focused on antisemitism. While the subject matter is politically charged, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the event itself rather than taking an overtly ideological stance. There is no evident slant
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Australia
