ON
← Back to feed
Attorney General Todd Blanche says the DOJ may take states’ voter roll fight to Supreme Court
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative3 days ago

Attorney General Todd Blanche says the DOJ may take states’ voter roll fight to Supreme Court

Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the Justice Department may seek Supreme Court intervention in multiple cases where lower courts have ruled against the federal government's attempts to obtain access to state voter rolls. This effort stems from an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump, requiring states to provide detailed voter information such as names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. The federal government claims it needs this data to investigate potential election irregularities, including non-citizen voting. While some states have complied, others have resisted, leading to lawsuits filed by the Justice Department against 30 states and Washington, D.C. Federal judges in states like Oregon and Michigan have sided with those opposing the federal request. Blanche emphasized the importance of ensuring election fairness and preventing constitutional violations, even at the state level. His recent confirmation as attorney general followed negotiations with Republican lawmakers regarding a controversial 'anti-weaponization' funding agreement.

Attorney General Todd Blanche indicated on Sunday that the U.S. Department of Justice might escalate its dispute over access to state voter rolls by taking the issue to the Supreme Court. This follows a series of judicial rulings against the federal government in 22 cases involving its attempts to obtain detailed information about voters from states ahead of the November midterm elections. Blanche confirmed during an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" that there is a "possibility" the DOJ could seek intervention from the nation's highest court. Blanche emphasized the importance of election integrity, stating that it was a central theme of former President Donald Trump's campaign and one that all Americans should support. He argued that the DOJ's efforts to examine potential issues within the electoral process were essential to ensuring fairness and proper conduct of elections. These investigations aim to identify any deficiencies or anomalies, particularly concerning the registration status of noncitizens. The initiative stems from an executive order issued by Trump, directing states to provide comprehensive data about their voters, including names, dates of birth, residential addresses, state driver’s licenses, and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. While some states have cooperated with the request, others have resisted, prompting the DOJ to file lawsuits against 30 states and Washington, D.C. Judicial responses have varied, with courts in states such as Oregon and Michigan ruling in favor of the 22 states that opposed the federal government's access to their voter rolls. These decisions reflect a broader principle that elections are traditionally managed at the state level, rather than by the federal government. Among the states resisting the federal demand are several Republican-led jurisdictions, including Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Georgia, and Vermont. Vermont Governor Phil Scott previously expressed confidence in state leadership regarding election management, asserting that local authorities are more suited to ensure fair elections. Blanche reiterated this sentiment, stressing the need for the DOJ to monitor for any constitutional or legal violations at the state level. Blanche assumed the role of attorney general following the confirmation by the Senate, having previously served as acting attorney general after former Attorney General Pam Bondi was dismissed by Trump in April. His appointment followed negotiations with key Republican senators, including Thom Tillis of North Carolina and John Cornyn of Texas, who voiced concerns about a proposed "anti-weaponization" fund tied to a settlement agreement related to Trump's lawsuit against the IRS. During his confirmation process, Blanche assured lawmakers that the anti-weaponization fund was no longer viable. He later reaffirmed this position during his appearance on "Meet the Press," stating that the fund was "dead." Before becoming attorney general, Blanche represented Trump personally in a legal case in New York City where the former president faced charges related to falsifying business records. Recently, Trump praised Blanche, suggesting he could become one of the greatest attorneys general in history if he maintains strength and resolve. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security faced scrutiny over claims regarding noncitizen voting. Initially, DHS informed Nevada officials that it had identified approximately 16,000 potential noncitizen voters on the state's rolls. However, subsequent statements revealed that the actual number was significantly lower, with only 185 individuals flagged as possible noncitizens. This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of initial reports and the basis for the federal government's requests for extensive voter data.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

NBC News logoNBC NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
Attorney General Todd Blanche says the DOJ may take states’ voter roll fight to Supreme Court

Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the Justice Department may seek Supreme Court intervention in multiple cases where lower courts have ruled against the federal government's attempts to obtain access to state voter rolls. This effort stems from an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump, requiring states to provide detailed voter information such as names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. The federal government claims it needs this data to investigate potential election irregularities, including non-citizen voting. While some states have complied, others have resisted, leading to lawsuits filed by the Justice Department against 30 states and Washington, D.C. Federal judges in states like Oregon and Michigan have sided with those opposing the federal request. Blanche emphasized the importance of ensuring election fairness and preventing constitutional violations, even at the state level. His recent confirmation as attorney general followed negotiations with Republican lawmakers regarding a controversial 'anti-weaponization' funding agreement.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a matter of election integrity and national security, emphasizing the need for federal oversight of state elections. It highlights the Trump-era executive order and quotes Blanche defending the Justice Department's actions as necessary to ensure fair elections, aligns

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports AG Todd Blanche's statement regarding the possibility of taking cases to the Supreme Court, citing his comments to NBC News' 'Meet the Press'. It provides context about the executive order, the Justice Department's actions, and judicial responses. However, it does not

Why objectivity (70): The article includes quotes from Blanche that emphasize election integrity and align with the Trump administration's rhetoric, which introduces a degree of bias. While it presents both sides (states resisting and the DOJ suing), the framing leans toward supporting the DOJ's position through selectiv

The New York Times (US) logoThe New York Times (US)Independent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 803 days ago
Homeland Security Made a Big Claim About Noncitizen Voting. Now It Can’t Prove It.

The Department of Homeland Security initially claimed there were nearly 16,000 potential noncitizens on Nevada's voter rolls but later revised this number to just 185 'potential' noncitizens. This significant reduction highlights discrepancies in the agency's claims and raises questions about the accuracy of their findings. The change suggests that the initial figure was likely based on flawed data or misinterpretation. The situation underscores concerns about the reliability of federal oversight in election integrity matters.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual correction regarding the Department of Homeland Security's claim about noncitizens on voter rolls without overtly criticizing or praising the agency. It focuses on the discrepancy between two figures without taking a clear ideological stance, thus maintaining a center-

Why factuality (75): The article reports that DHS initially claimed 16,000 potential noncitizens on Nevada's voter rolls but later revised that number to 185 'potential' noncitizens. This aligns with subsequent reporting from other media outlets that have covered the same issue, indicating consistency in the core claim.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, focusing on the discrepancy between the initial claim and the corrected figure. It avoids taking sides or expressing strong opinions about the implications of the change, maintaining a balanced approach.

Fox News (US) logoFox News (US)IndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 6010 days ago
Speaker Johnson slams Dems after noncitizens were charged with illegally voting in battleground state

Fox News reports that House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized Democrats over concerns about noncitizens voting in U.S. elections, citing recent charges in Michigan. Five non-U.S. citizens and a U.S. citizen accused of registering a noncitizen husband were charged with election crimes. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel stated that while noncitizen voting is rare, her office investigates all claims and prosecutes violations. The White House and Homeland Security have emphasized efforts to prevent illegal voting, with Trump's administration prioritizing citizenship verification. Johnson accused Democrats of opposing voter ID laws and supporting open borders, framing the issue as a threat to election integrity.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames noncitizen voting as a significant threat to election integrity, using strong language like 'clear and present danger' and 'illegal aliens.' It emphasizes Republican efforts to combat the issue while criticizing Democrats for opposing voter ID laws and supporting open borders. The

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a specific incident involving noncitizens being charged with illegally voting in Michigan, citing a state review of 38 suspected cases and the outcomes of some of them. It references statements from House Speaker Mike Johnson and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, a

Why objectivity (60): The tone is clearly aligned with conservative political messaging, using terms like 'illegal aliens' and framing Democrats as opponents of election security measures. The article presents the issue through a political lens, suggesting a partisan perspective rather than a neutral analysis.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories