6 reports
2027: Atiku challenges Obasanjo to be transparent, declare his support for TinubuAtiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), accused former President Olusegun Obasanjo of secretly supporting his relative ahead of the 2027 Nigerian presidential election. Atiku challenged Obasanjo to publicly declare his preferred candidate to ensure transparency, following Obasanjo's recent claim that Atiku had provided former House of Representatives Speaker Ghali Na'Abba with ₦5 million to initiate impeachment proceedings against Obasanjo during their time in office. Atiku's statement, issued by his senior special assistant, suggested that these allegations were a deliberate attempt to harm his political standing and benefit Obasanjo's family. The accusation indirectly targets President Bola Tinubu, whom Atiku refers to as Obasanjo's 'kinsman,' given their shared regional background. The dispute highlights longstanding tensions between Obasanjo and Tinubu, including past conflicts over governance and electoral issues.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Atiku's accusations against Obasanjo, emphasizing transparency and questioning the credibility of Obasanjo's claims. While the content is balanced in presenting both perspectives, the emphasis on Atiku's call for openness and the indirect criticism of Tinubu
Why factuality (85): Article 6 continues the discussion of Atiku challenging Obasanjo's alleged support for his relative, consistent with other articles. It includes specific claims and responses, aligning with cross-source reporting.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the allegations and Atiku's response without clear bias, but the framing of Obasanjo's actions as politically motivated could introduce subtle bias.
Fiscal vandalism: Atiku raises alarm over Nigeria’s N12.62tr debt profileFormer Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar has criticized the current administration for exceeding its 2024 borrowing limit by N4.79 trillion, resulting in total borrowing reaching N12.62 trillion. He describes this as 'fiscal vandalism' and claims the Tinubu administration has lost control of the nation's finances. Atiku highlights that despite promises that economic reforms like removing fuel subsidies and increasing taxes would reduce borrowing, the opposite has occurred, leading to increased debt and waste. He points out that the government borrowed 61.2% more than approved by the National Assembly and secured an additional N3.19 trillion through unspecified 'budget support.' Atiku argues that these funds are not being used effectively for essential services like education, healthcare, or infrastructure, while the government continues to accumulate debt despite a significant oil revenue windfall.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a strong critique of the current administration's fiscal policies, using terms like 'fiscal vandalism,' 'lost control,' and 'waste,' which indicate a negative assessment of the government's actions. The framing emphasizes mismanagement and lack of accountability, aligning with a
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about Nigeria's debt profile, including figures and percentages, which are consistent with other reports. It accurately attributes these concerns to Atiku and cites his statement about 'fiscal vandalism.' The data appears to be well-supported and consistent
Why objectivity (65): The article uses strong terms like 'fiscal vandalism' and 'completely lost control of the nation’s finances,' which convey a negative assessment of the Tinubu administration. While it presents Atiku's perspective, it does not include responses or counterarguments from the government.
The PunchIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 608 days agoFormer Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar criticized President Bola Tinubu's administration for comparing China's legal system to justify its actions, arguing that this comparison highlighted past allegations against Tinubu. Atiku, running as the African Democratic Congress' presidential candidate, accused the administration of making a 'monumental own goal' by referencing China's severe drug trafficking penalties. The administration had previously responded to Atiku's claims about his lobbying group's petitions to U.S. authorities regarding a 1993 civil forfeiture case against Tinubu. In response, Atiku's spokesperson, Phrank Shaibu, stated that the administration's rebuttal focused on personal attacks rather than addressing substantive issues. Shaibu emphasized that the administration's attempt to undermine Atiku inadvertently drew more public scrutiny on Tinubu, particularly regarding the $460,000 forfeiture case. Atiku reiterated that he has never been indicted or convicted of any criminal offense.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the Tinubu administration as a legitimate challenge to its credibility, emphasizing transparency and accountability. It highlights the administration's perceived lack of factual basis in its defense and portrays the opposition's arguments as grounded in public记录.
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports Atiku's criticism of the Presidency for comparing Tinubu to China's legal system and his response to the U.S. forfeiture issue. It includes direct quotes from Atiku's statement, which are consistent with other reports. However, it omits specific details about the U.S.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses strong language such as 'monumental own goal' and 'barrage of name-calling and political invective,' which reflect Atiku's viewpoint but do not present a balanced view of the Presidency's response. The tone is clearly aligned with Atiku's critique.
Atiku demands apology to Onaiyekan, rejects Tinubu’s economic claimsFormer Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar criticized the current administration led by President Bola Tinubu, accusing them of suppressing dissent and manipulating statistics to hide the country's deteriorating economic conditions. He also demanded an apology from the government for criticizing Cardinal John Onaiyekan, a prominent Catholic leader, after the cardinal expressed concerns about Nigeria's political and economic state. Atiku praised the Catholic Church for its role as a moral voice in the nation and encouraged other religious leaders to speak truth to power. He argued that the government's response to Onaiyekan's comments was an attempt to control public discourse rather than engage constructively with legitimate criticisms.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Atiku's criticism of the Tinubu administration as a defense of transparency and accountability, highlighting the government's alleged suppression of dissent and manipulation of data. It emphasizes the moral authority of religious leaders like Cardinal Onaiyekan and portrays the总统府
Atiku condemns presidency’s attack on Catholic bishops, demands apologyFormer Vice President Atiku Abubakar criticized the Nigerian presidency for attacking the Catholic Church and Cardinal John Onaiyekan, accusing the administration of being intolerant of dissent. He called for an apology to Cardinal Onaiyekan and the Catholic faithful, condemning the presidency's response to the bishops' criticisms as arrogant and disrespectful. Atiku argued that the presidency should engage in introspection rather than resorting to intimidation and discrediting religious leaders. He praised the Catholic Church for its longstanding role in advocating for the poor and vulnerable, emphasizing the importance of religious leaders speaking truth to power. Atiku defended Cardinal Onaiyekan's decision to speak publicly, asserting it was an effort to present facts rather than control the narrative.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the presidency's actions as politically motivated attacks against religious leaders, portraying them as intolerant and authoritarian. It emphasizes the moral authority of the Catholic Church and criticizes the administration for suppressing dissent, which aligns with left-leaning抨
Catholic priests not like ‘fake bishops’, Atiku flays presidency’s attack on OnaiyekanPresidential candidate Atiku Abubakar criticized the Tinubu administration for attacking Cardinal John Onaiyekan and the Catholic Church, accusing them of intolerance toward dissent. Atiku claimed the administration uses intimidation rather than engaging with critical perspectives, referencing a recent televised interview where Onaiyekan expressed concerns about economic hardship. The cardinal's comments reportedly upset Tinubu and his officials, leading to accusations that Onaiyekan and the Church supported Atiku's rival, Peter Obi. Atiku argued that the administration surrounds itself with 'fake bishops' for political gain, contrasting this with the independence of genuine clergy. He praised the Church's role in speaking truth to power and condemned efforts to suppress or manipulate the bishops' messages.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the administration's actions as politically motivated suppression of dissent, using strong language such as 'intimidation,' 'war against honest voices,' and 'fake bishops.' It portrays the Catholic Church as a moral authority independent of politics, which aligns with left-leaning
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
NG
