Asta Vrečko / DSSDS does not understand and does not like Slovenian culture
Former Culture Minister Asta Vrečko, a member of the Left, criticizes the current Janša-led government for allegedly mismanaging cultural funding. She highlights that during the 2023 floods, all ministries, including culture, contributed 4% of their budgets for emergency aid, ensuring continuous support for cultural projects despite the crisis. Vrečko notes that while this was challenging, it was understood at the time. However, she points out that members of the SDS party mocked these efforts on social media, claiming it was wasteful spending. She also mentions two successful films, 'Igrišča Ne Damo' and 'Ida,' which won awards and were supported by the ministry. Vrečko argues that the excuse of insufficient budget for suspending calls for applications, non-payment of volunteers, and fulfilling contractual obligations is misleading. She emphasizes that the budget has been sufficient this year and next, allowing for ongoing programs. She warns that paying full contributions to religious employees will significantly impact the cultural budget but insists that funds will still be found. Finally, she suggests that the criticism stems from ideological opposition to those who have been,
A cultural organization has called on Minister of Culture Ignacija Fridl Jarc to reconsider her recent statement regarding the unfeasibility of a tripartite agreement that established the Public Institute for Contemporary Dance Development. The group submitted a petition demanding immediate fulfillment of the institute’s founding obligations, citing concerns over the government's adherence to legal commitments and the credibility of its cultural policies. The controversy began during a session of the National Council for Culture on Monday, where Minister Fridl Jarc stated that the tripartite agreement under which the institute was founded is not feasible due to insufficient funding in the budget. She emphasized that there is currently no appropriate legal basis for financing the institute’s operations in 2026, noting the absence of both a staffing plan and an approved work program and financial plan. Her comments sparked public concern and criticism from within the dance community. Simon Kardum, acting director of the Public Institute for Contemporary Dance Development, responded sharply to the minister’s remarks, calling them “total nonsense” and accusing her of misleading the public with false statements. He clarified that the organizational structure of the institute includes not just the director and assistant director but also two regional coordinators funded by partner municipalities and six employees essential for the institute’s immediate operations. Other positions fall under cohesion funds and are exclusively reserved for creators and artists. The potential dissolution of the institute has raised alarm among the broader dance community. Teja Reba, president of the Society for Contemporary Dance, highlighted the effort invested in establishing the institute quickly with minimal resources and a small team. She warned that if the government fails to meet its obligations, it undermines trust in the legal framework and the legitimacy of its cultural policies. The issue has drawn attention beyond the immediate dance sector, with former culture minister and Left Party MP Asta Vrečko commenting on the broader implications. In a social media post, she criticized the current government led by Prime Minister Janez Janša for allegedly targeting culture through budget cuts and policy changes. Vrečko pointed out that despite the devastating floods in early August 2023, the government did not cut funding for cultural projects or cancel contracts, even providing additional support to affected filmmakers. She noted that while some members of the SDS party had previously mocked such emergency measures, they were ultimately accepted. Vrečko argued that using the lack of funds as an excuse for halting tenders, non-payment of grants, and failure to fulfill contractual obligations is unacceptable. She cited examples of threats to all approved projects, cancellation of scholarships, international collaborations, and residencies, suggesting these actions align with the SDS’s ideological stance against certain groups. Vrečko further mentioned that the budget for this year and next has been record-high, emphasizing that funds are available, otherwise tenders could not have been published. She criticized the decision to pay full contributions to religious staff, highlighting its significant financial impact on the culture budget and its anomaly compared to other allocations. Despite this, she noted that solutions always seem to be found for such issues. She concluded that the situation reflects a cultural ideological battle against those labeled as enemies, which inevitably harms the entire cultural sector. Given that the SDS has held the Ministry of Culture four times, including once when it was abolished and another time when it pursued explicitly anti-cultural policies, she suggested that the current developments should not come as a surprise. Vrečko asserted that the SDS does not understand or care for Slovenian culture, and it is time for everyone to recognize this reality.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Former Education Minister and Sloboda MP Vinko Logaj disagrees with current Minister Borut Rončevič’s assessment that the financial situation at the Ministry of Education, Science, and Youth is alarming. Logaj argues that the situation is similar to previous years and notes that funds were available during the transition period under former Prime Minister Robert Gola. According to information provided by the ministry, approximately €133 million is expected to be short by year-end, with €111.6 million missing specifically for primary and secondary schools. Logaj acknowledges increased costs in the current year but states that the government has allocated funds through reallocating resources to ensure salary payments for education sector employees. He emphasizes that while there is still a gap between planned and available expenditures, budget adjustments continue throughout the year. Logaj also highlights that various expenses fall under the ministry’s purview, including subsidies for additional children and support for parents with multiple children in daycare, which require over €65 million annually.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—current minister Borut Rončevič’s concern about financial instability and former minister Vinko Logaj’s defense of fiscal management. The tone remains balanced, avoiding overtly positive or negative language toward either side. It reports on differing opinions,
Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports the financial shortfall of approximately 133 million euros at the Ministry of Education, citing specific figures for basic and secondary education (111.6 million) as well as higher education and research (21.3 million). It also includes quotes from Vinko Logaj regardin
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the situation in a neutral manner, quoting both Logaj and the ministry. It avoids overtly biased language and provides context about the budget adjustments and ongoing discussions. The tone remains objective and balanced.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 803 days ago
Minister of Culture Ignacija Fridl Jarc stated during a session of the National Council for Culture that the tripartite agreement establishing the Public Institute for Contemporary Dance Development is unfeasible due to insufficient funding and missing documentation such as staffing plans and work programs. This has sparked public concern, leading to a petition demanding the ministry fulfill its establishment obligations. Simon Kardum, acting director of the institute, criticized her claims as misleading, explaining that the institute’s structure includes regional coordinators funded by partner municipalities and six employees dedicated to immediate operations. The institute’s abolition would worry the entire dance community, as efforts have been made to launch it quickly with minimal resources.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the minister's concerns and the counterarguments from the institute's acting director and the dance community, offering balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It does not use loaded language or selectively omit context.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the minister's statement that the tripartite agreement for establishing the Public Institute for Contemporary Dance Development is not feasible due to lack of funding, legal basis, and personnel plans. It also includes direct quotes from Simon Kardum, the acting direct
Why objectivity (80): The article presents both sides of the issue—minister's statements and the director's rebuttal—without overt bias. However, the title implies criticism of the minister, which slightly affects neutrality. Overall, the tone remains relatively balanced.
MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 657 days ago
Former Culture Minister Asta Vrečko, a member of the Left, criticizes the current Janša-led government for allegedly mismanaging cultural funding. She highlights that during the 2023 floods, all ministries, including culture, contributed 4% of their budgets for emergency aid, ensuring continuous support for cultural projects despite the crisis. Vrečko notes that while this was challenging, it was understood at the time. However, she points out that members of the SDS party mocked these efforts on social media, claiming it was wasteful spending. She also mentions two successful films, 'Igrišča Ne Damo' and 'Ida,' which won awards and were supported by the ministry. Vrečko argues that the excuse of insufficient budget for suspending calls for applications, non-payment of volunteers, and fulfilling contractual obligations is misleading. She emphasizes that the budget has been sufficient this year and next, allowing for ongoing programs. She warns that paying full contributions to religious employees will significantly impact the cultural budget but insists that funds will still be found. Finally, she suggests that the criticism stems from ideological opposition to those who have been,
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the SDS government as politically motivated, emphasizing ideological conflict over cultural funding decisions. The tone suggests that the SDS's actions are part of a broader ideological battle against cultural supporters, implying a left-leaning perspective. The指责
Why factuality (70): The article discusses past events related to cultural funding under the previous government and criticizes the current government for alleged neglect of culture. While it references historical facts, it does not directly address the current situation of the dance institute. This makes it less aligne
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear political tone, criticizing the current government and favoring the previous administration. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'pesek v oči' (grain of sand in the eye) and frames the issue in a partisan manner, making it less objective compared to the other article
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
