El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 959 days agoAspirants who passed the online entrance exam for the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) protested in Ciudad Universitaria against the possibility of repeating the test in person. They used slogans such as '118 aciertos no fue suerte, fue esfuerzo' and 'Mi esfuerzo no se repite, se respeta' to demand respect for their results. The protests followed controversy over potential use of artificial intelligence to answer the exam, which was conducted from May 23 to June 10 and results were announced on July 17. The university temporarily suspended documentation and enrollment processes for new students. The UNAM's Technical Committee will issue recommendations this week.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, focusing on the concerns of both accepted and rejected applicants. It reports on the protests by accepted candidates without overtly favoring either side, though there is some emphasis on the legitimacy of the online exam process. The tone is
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the timeline and expectations surrounding the technical commission reviewing the admissions process. This aligns with other sources and reflects the current status of the investigation.
Why objectivity (95): The tone is neutral and factual, presenting the situation objectively without any clear bias or emotional language.
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days ago The university estimates at 51 mdp the cost of the examThe Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) estimated the cost of the online entrance exam for undergraduate programs in 2025 to be 51.4 million pesos. The university explained that this figure was based on the number of applications and services provided during the enrollment process. The contract with Territorium Life was established under an open tender model, setting a minimum amount of 40.7 million pesos and a maximum of 101.7 million pesos, both including VAT. The maximum amount represents only the authorized budget limit to accommodate all applicants if necessary, and does not imply an obligation to pay. The university noted that the actual cost for the 2024 in-person exam was 49.2 million pesos, showing an increase of approximately 2.17 million pesos.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the financial aspects of the UNAM entrance exam, focusing on budgetary estimates and contractual terms. It provides balanced reporting by explaining the context of the pricing structure, the nature of the contract, and the distinction between the 'm
Why factuality (95): The article provides specific figures regarding the estimated cost of the online entrance exam for UNAM, citing a range from 40 million to 101 million pesos. It also references the actual amount spent in previous years and compares it to this year’s estimate. These details align with what would be e
Why objectivity (90): The article presents information in a neutral manner, using direct quotes from UNAM officials and providing comparative data without apparent bias. The tone remains professional and factual throughout, avoiding emotionally charged language or overtly opinionated statements.
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago Applicants reveal irregularities in admission exam to UNAM; surveillance with AI was insufficient and lax, they sayApplicants who took the online entrance exam for the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) have reported irregularities and deficiencies in the testing process. They claim that the university’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) for monitoring was insufficient, anomalous, and lax, allowing candidates to bypass surveillance by using mobile devices simultaneously or manipulating camera blind spots. These issues reportedly caused technical disruptions during the exam, including frequent alerts requiring applicants to check their cameras, which interrupted their ability to focus on answering questions. One applicant described being forced to rush through the test due to time constraints, despite having completed practice exams much faster. The applicants are calling on the university to strengthen security measures for future large-scale virtual exams to ensure transparency and prevent technological suspicions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the concerns of rejected applicants regarding the fairness and integrity of the UNAM entrance exam. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports on the claims made by applicants and highlights the need for improved security measures. There is no overtly biased framing
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the support from UNAM directors for reviewing the admissions process and strengthening institutional trust. This aligns with other sources and reflects the official stance of the university.
Why objectivity (90): The tone leans slightly supportive of the university’s position but remains mostly factual, avoiding strong bias while emphasizing the need for transparency and reform.
La JornadaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9011 days agoThe National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) has established a Technical Commission to review procedures following irregularities detected in an online examination. The commission aims to investigate the circumstances surrounding the anomalies and ensure the integrity of the assessment process. This move comes amid concerns over the reliability of online exams and potential vulnerabilities in the system. The investigation could lead to changes in how such examinations are conducted in the future.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an institutional response to procedural issues in an academic setting without overtly favoring any political side. It focuses on administrative actions rather than ideological positions or partisan conflict.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately states that the UNAM has installed a technical commission to review the online exam process after irregular results were found. This is consistent with other reports on the investigation.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents facts without taking sides, maintaining a balanced perspective throughout.
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 853 days ago UNAM hired Territorium for baccalaureate exam; in 2025 it paid at least 31 mdp and boasted 9 perfect scoresThe National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) signed a contract with Territorium Life, S.A.P.I. de C.V. in 2025 for the administration of online entrance exams for its high school programs. The contract had a minimum value of 31 million 716 thousand 720 pesos and a maximum of 79 million 291 thousand 800 pesos. This followed the discontinuation of the previous exam system managed by the now-defunct Comisión Metropolitana de Instituciones Públicas de Educación Media Superior (Comipems). In its first year using the new system through the Espacio de Coordinación de la Educación Media Superior (Ecoems), UNAM reported an increase of 1,600 students in its high school enrollment and a 10% improvement in student performance compared to previous years.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a contractual agreement between a public university and a private company, including financial figures and outcomes such as increased enrollment and improved test scores. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing.
Why factuality (95): This article provides detailed and specific information about the contract between UNAM and Territorium Life, including financial figures and the purpose of the exam. It aligns closely with other sources and offers precise data that supports its claims.
Why objectivity (85): While the article presents facts objectively, it includes some editorializing in quotes from individuals, which slightly reduces its neutrality. Overall, it remains largely balanced in its reporting.
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8510 days ago Who is behind Territorium Life, the company that developed the UNAM exam?; it is a Mexican company that operates in the USThe admission process for undergraduate programs at Mexico's National Autonomous University (UNAM) was halted due to unusual results in the entrance exam. Concerns include allegations that students used artificial intelligence to cheat during the test and potential flaws in the monitoring mechanisms. The university has formed a commission to review the evaluation process, student performance, and the functionality of the platform used for the exam. As part of this review, the performance of Territorium Life, the Mexican company responsible for hosting the technological platform where the exam was administered, will be examined. The goal is to determine whether the company met all conditions to ensure a secure and reliable process. If any violations are found, the company could face penalties amounting to up to 10% of the total contract value.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the situation, including concerns raised by applicants, actions taken by the university, and information about the company involved. There is no overtly biased language, and the focus remains on the investigation into the exam process rather than taking a
Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information about the suspension of the admission process due to atypical results, allegations of AI cheating, and the formation of a technical commission by UNAM. These points are corroborated by other articles and provide a comprehensive overview of the situation as
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively objective tone, presenting facts from both the perspective of the applicants and the university. Some phrases like 'llegará a las últimas consecuencias' may imply a slight bias toward the university’s resolve, but overall it remains balanced.
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 807 days ago Students celebrate UNAM's new face-to-face control exam; "I will prepare as I prepared this year", they sayThe National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) has decided to administer a new in-person entrance exam for students who were either accepted into undergraduate programs for 2026 or those who narrowly missed out but achieved scores comparable to past admission thresholds. Ana Sofía Romero, a student aspiring to study dentistry, expressed her gratitude for this opportunity, stating she will prepare thoroughly for the exam again. The online entrance exam was previously taken by over 158,000 applicants, with 2% disqualified due to irregularities. UNAM used AI-based monitoring during the online exams to detect misconduct. This new in-person exam aims to verify results for admitted students while offering another chance to those who fell just short.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision by UNAM neutrally, focusing on the procedural aspects of the exam changes and student reactions. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains balanced between the university’s actions and student voices
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the new control exam and includes direct quotes from students who support the decision. It aligns with other sources regarding the exam’s implementation and eligibility criteria.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is somewhat biased in favor of the students’ perspective, as it emphasizes their positive reactions and motivations. While not overly slanted, it leans toward supporting the students’ viewpoint.
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago Amid protests, UNAM sets up commission to review possible cheating in virtual exam; it will come to the last consequences, saysStudents who failed the first online entrance exam for undergraduate programs at Mexico's National Autonomous University (UNAM) have been protesting outside the campus, demanding the cancellation of the test and a return to in-person exams. In response, UNAM has established a Technical Commission to investigate alleged irregularities in the exam process. The university's rector, Leonardo Lomelí Vanegas, stated that the commission will analyze the procedures and results of the selection process, which has raised concerns due to unusual outcomes. The commission will have the authority to request additional information and summon officials involved in the process. The goal is to clarify the situation, ensure transparency, and prevent unfair advantages that could undermine access to higher education for those who studied diligently.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, focusing on the establishment of a technical commission by UNAM to investigate claims of irregularities in an online entrance exam. It includes quotes from the rector emphasizing fairness and transparency but does not take a stance on the validity of抗议
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the protests by rejected applicants and the formation of a technical commission by UNAM. It aligns with other sources but omits some specifics about the nature of the alleged fraud or the outcomes of the investigation.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is somewhat biased towards the students’ perspective, using phrases like ‘exigir la cancelación del examen’ and highlighting their demands more prominently than the university’s response. This slightly skews the balance of the narrative.
MX
