Arundhati Roy, the acclaimed author and activist, posed a pointed question during her visit to Jantar Mantar on Monday, a day following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision to replace his education minister amid growing youth unrest. “Does Modi know what was being said about him?” she asked, reflecting on the recent wave of public discourse surrounding the leader. The remarks came as part of a broader discussion on the evolving nature of political satire and its impact on public perception. The protests initially centered on allegations of an examination paper leak in May, but they quickly escalated into a larger movement fueled by frustration with government policies and perceived authoritarianism. Last week, tensions reached a boiling point when Delhi Police deployed batons and pellet guns against demonstrators, prompting widespread outrage. In response, young activists took to social media to express their discontent through humor and irony, crafting memes and jokes that mocked the prime minister in ways described by Roy as “delightfully profane.” Roy emphasized the power of humor as a form of political critique, stating that it often encapsulates the essence of political struggle. Speaking to Scroll’s Executive Editor Supriya Sharma, she noted how the use of satire can strip away the carefully constructed image of leaders. She highlighted the emergence of the “cockroach” movement, a grassroots campaign born from a social media parody account. According to Roy, this movement has surpassed its initial goals, achieving a level of public scrutiny that even the most guarded figures cannot escape. She pointed to Modi’s long-standing efforts to cultivate a specific public persona, one that has been reinforced over nearly two decades since he entered national politics. Despite his reluctance to engage directly with the media, never having held a formal press conference, Modi has maintained a mythos that includes titles such as “vishwaguru” and “avataar of vishnu.” Roy argued that the recent backlash has effectively dismantled this carefully curated image within just two weeks. The shift in public sentiment reflects a broader trend of increasing cynicism toward political leadership, particularly among younger generations who feel disconnected from traditional forms of governance. Social media platforms have become crucial tools for expressing dissent, allowing individuals to bypass conventional channels of communication and reach a wider audience. This dynamic has led to a new kind of political engagement, one rooted in digital culture and characterized by rapid dissemination of ideas. As the situation continues to evolve, there are indications that the pressure on Modi will intensify. With the government facing mounting criticism over its handling of the protests and the broader issues affecting youth, the need for policy reforms and greater transparency appears urgent. Meanwhile, the role of artists and writers like Roy in shaping public discourse remains significant, offering alternative narratives that challenge dominant ideologies. The coming days will likely see further developments as both the government and opposition continue to navigate the complex landscape of public opinion. Whether the current momentum translates into lasting change or merely serves as a momentary disruption remains to be seen. For now, however, the focus remains on the ongoing dialogue between state authority and civil society, with the potential for continued shifts in power dynamics.
2 reports
NDTVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 709 days ago Pak-Based Handles Active During Op Sindoor Spread Rumours Amid Protests: CopsDelhi Police reported that social media accounts based in Pakistan were actively spreading rumors, fake posts, and edited videos during the ongoing 'Operation Sindoor' protests. These actions were alleged to be aimed at inciting unrest among the public, especially students. The police highlighted the role of these external actors in exacerbating tensions during the demonstrations.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the actions of Pakistan-based social media handles as deliberate attempts to incite unrest, which implies a negative view of foreign interference in domestic affairs. This framing aligns with a right-leaning perspective that emphasizes national security and the threat posed by外部势力
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a statement from a Delhi Police official regarding Pakistani-based social media accounts spreading rumors during protests. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that such activities were occurring. The claim is attributed to an official source, lending credibility, though
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the police statement as a factual report but uses emotionally charged language like 'taking advantage of the prevailing situation' and 'instigating people,' which may reflect a biased perspective. The focus on Pakistani actors suggests a potential geopolitical angle.
Scroll.inIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 604 days ago Arundhati Roy: ‘Does Modi know what was being said about him?’Arundhati Roy questioned whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi is aware of the criticisms and ridicule directed at him following recent protests in Delhi. The protests initially stemmed from concerns over an exam paper leak but escalated into widespread backlash after Delhi Police used force against youth demonstrators. In response, young people created humorous content mocking Modi online, using language described as 'delightfully profane.' Roy noted that the 'cockroach' movement, originating from a social media parody account, has effectively exposed Modi's carefully constructed public image, which has remained largely unchallenged for years.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Arundhati Roy's critical perspective on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, highlighting the public ridicule and challenges to his carefully maintained image. The framing emphasizes the impact of youth-led movements and uses language that critiques Modi's governance and public persona
Why factuality (50): The article discusses Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's criticisms of the government and the use of pellet guns, but it lacks detailed information on the specific incidents or injuries. It focuses more on political critique than on factual reporting on the use of pellet guns.
Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical of the government and uses emotive language, such as 'slamming the government for using force.' It frames the situation as a political conflict rather than presenting facts objectively.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter