ON
← Back to feed
Ariana Grande Rages at Trump for Using Her Song in Trans-Trolling TikTok Post
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

Ariana Grande Rages at Trump for Using Her Song in Trans-Trolling TikTok Post

Ariana Grande publicly criticized President Donald Trump for using her song 'We Can’t Be Friends (Wait for Your Love)' in a TikTok post that promoted traditional gender roles and opposed transgender rights. The video, posted by the Trump campaign, included the lyrics 'men can’t have babies and should never compete in women’s sports,' which Grande deemed offensive. In response, Grande commented on the post, telling Trump's team to 'Never use my music again' and calling his 'truth false.' This incident follows previous instances where Grande has opposed the use of her music in politically charged contexts, such as when Trump's media team used her song 'Bye' in a video depicting ICE operations. She has expressed support for Democratic candidates like Kamala Harris and previously performed for former President Barack Obama. Other artists, including Sabrina Carpenter, ABBA, Céline Dion, and Beyoncé, have also demanded that Trump's campaign stop using their music for political messaging.

Ariana Grande has publicly condemned President Donald Trump for using her 2024 song “We Can’t Be Friends (Wait for Your Love)” in a TikTok video that promotes anti-transgender rhetoric. The incident occurred on Thursday, as part of a broader pattern of resistance from artists against the use of their music to advance the administration's policies. Grande, a three-time Grammy winner, expressed her disapproval through a comment on the video, urging Trump to stop using her work and calling his stance on gender identity “false.” The TikTok video, posted by the Trump campaign, featured footage of Trump stepping onto a stage at a rally. The accompanying captions included a lyric from Grande’s song, “Me and my truth we sit in silence”, before shifting to a message asserting that “men can’t have babies and should never compete in women’s sports.” The post concluded with the hashtag #trump #arianagrande #maga, suggesting alignment with the administration’s messaging. The clip was intended to reinforce the idea that biological sex determines eligibility for certain activities, such as sports competition. Grande responded directly to the video, writing in the comments section: “Never use my music again. Also, your truth is false.” This statement marks yet another instance of the singer taking a firm stand against the use of her music in politically charged contexts. It follows a similar confrontation earlier this year, when Trump’s media team used her song “Bye” in a video promoting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. At that time, Grande had also issued a scathing response, telling the administration to “please do not ever use my music in relation to this barbaric, inhumane, heinous nonsense.” The controversy over the use of popular music in political campaigns is not new. Over the past few years, numerous artists have voiced objections to the White House leveraging their songs to support specific policies. Among them are Taylor Swift, Sabrina Carpenter, and the Rolling Stones, all of whom have rejected attempts to co-opt their work for political ends. In one notable case, Sabrina Carpenter reportedly told the White House to avoid using her 2024 song “Juno” in clips showcasing ICE operations, warning that doing so would risk her involvement in the administration’s agenda. The use of music in political messaging has become increasingly common, particularly within the context of social media platforms like TikTok. These platforms allow for rapid dissemination of content, often blending entertainment with advocacy. However, many artists argue that their work should not be repurposed to serve political narratives, especially when such usage appears to contradict the values or messages they wish to convey. Grande, who is currently concluding her Eternal Sunshine Tour, has long maintained a public presence that includes both artistic and political commentary. She previously supported Kamala Harris for president and performed at the White House in 2014 under former President Barack Obama. Her recent actions reflect a continued commitment to protecting the integrity of her art from being exploited for ideological purposes. Other high-profile figures, including ABBA, Céline Dion, and Beyoncé, have also raised concerns about the use of their music in Trump’s 2024 re-election campaign. These instances highlight a broader cultural shift in how artists view the role of their work in public discourse. As more musicians speak out, the pressure on political entities to respect the boundaries of creative expression continues to grow.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
Ariana Grande calls for Trump to take down another song from a TikTok video

Pop singer Ariana Grande criticized President Donald Trump after his administration used her 2024 song 'We Can’t Be Friends (Wait for Your Love)' in a TikTok video promoting anti-transgender views. The video featured Trump at a rally and included a caption referencing lyrics from the song before shifting to a message supporting exclusionary policies toward transgender individuals. Grande commented on the video, stating, 'Never use my music again. Also, your truth is false.' This follows a previous incident in June where her song 'Bye' was used in a video promoting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). She joins other artists like Taylor Swift and the Rolling Stones who have opposed the use of their music by Trump's campaign.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a conflict between a prominent artist and the Trump administration over the misuse of music to promote controversial social policies. The language emphasizes the ethical concerns raised by Grande and other artists, suggesting a left-leaning perspective on issues of言论和

Why factuality (85): The article reports that Ariana Grande criticized President Trump for using her song in a TikTok video promoting anti-transgender views. It mentions Deadline confirming that her label is working to remove the song from the clip and provides details about the content of the video. The information ali

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical of Trump and presents Grande's criticism as a significant event. While it reports facts neutrally, there is a slight bias in emphasizing the controversy and framing the situation as a conflict between Grande and the Trump administration.

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 652 days ago
Ariana Grande Rages at Trump for Using Her Song in Trans-Trolling TikTok Post

Ariana Grande publicly criticized President Donald Trump for using her song 'We Can’t Be Friends (Wait for Your Love)' in a TikTok post that promoted traditional gender roles and opposed transgender rights. The video, posted by the Trump campaign, included the lyrics 'men can’t have babies and should never compete in women’s sports,' which Grande deemed offensive. In response, Grande commented on the post, telling Trump's team to 'Never use my music again' and calling his 'truth false.' This incident follows previous instances where Grande has opposed the use of her music in politically charged contexts, such as when Trump's media team used her song 'Bye' in a video depicting ICE operations. She has expressed support for Democratic candidates like Kamala Harris and previously performed for former President Barack Obama. Other artists, including Sabrina Carpenter, ABBA, Céline Dion, and Beyoncé, have also demanded that Trump's campaign stop using their music for political messaging.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Trump's actions as aligned with conservative values, particularly regarding traditional gender roles and opposition to transgender rights. It portrays Grande's criticism as politically motivated and highlights her alignment with progressive causes. The tone suggests a rightward sl

Why factuality (80): The article confirms that Ariana Grande criticized Trump for using her song in a TikTok post related to transgender issues. It references previous instances where her songs were used by the Trump campaign and includes quotes from her comments. The information is consistent with other sources but con

Why objectivity (65): The article uses more emotionally charged language such as 'rages,' 'trans-trolling,' and 'barbaric, inhumane, heinous nonsense.' This suggests a clear ideological leaning against Trump and a more subjective framing of the events compared to a more neutral report.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories