The Catalan police force, Mossos d'Esquadra, admitted to the court that there is no documented record of who ordered the surveillance of a teachers' assembly. In a report provided to the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC), the police stated they cannot provide the operational order that preceded the spying because it was not put in writing. This lack of documentation has become a significant issue for whistleblowers who report human rights violations by law enforcement. The case involves the infiltration of two agents during a teachers' assembly preparing for a strike, which intensified tensions between educators and the regional government. Three unions have filed administrative lawsuits demanding accountability from the police for violating teachers' fundamental rights. The judges require detailed documentation and witness testimony before making a ruling. However, the Mossos responded with vague and generic information, stating that their operations are confidential and do not result in written records. The head of the Mossos' Information Department explained that data collected by agents is used solely for internal decision-making and operational planning.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the legal proceedings and the police's response without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the judicial process and the lack of documentation, while maintaining neutrality in its presentation of both the claims made by the unions and the just
Why factuality (85): The article reports on an official statement from the Mossos d'Esquadra admitting they do not have documentation regarding who ordered the surveillance of a teachers' assembly. It references a report obtained by elDiario.es and mentions ongoing legal proceedings, including demands from three unions
Why objectivity (78): The article presents the situation in a neutral tone, reporting facts and legal actions without overt bias. However, it emphasizes the heightened tensions between educators and authorities, which may subtly frame the issue as a conflict over rights, potentially influencing reader perception.





