ON
← Back to feed
Apple to change app data consent rules, says regulator
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

Apple to change app data consent rules, says regulator

Apple has agreed to modify its app data consent rules for third-party applications on iOS devices following concerns raised by Germany's Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt). The regulator stated that Apple's current framework required third-party apps to use specific prompts for data collection, while Apple's own apps faced fewer restrictions. Under the new agreement, Apple will align its consent prompts for both its own apps and third-party apps, removing restrictive elements from the prompts provided to external developers. This aims to give users clearer choices regarding personalized advertising and ensure fairness between Apple's services and those of its competitors. The changes are part of a broader effort to ensure compliance with Germany's competition laws, though they do not target increasing consent rates for personalized ads.

Apple will modify its approach to app data consent following a ruling by Germany's competition authority, the Bundeskartellamt. The regulator announced on Monday that Apple has committed to changing how it seeks user consent for personalized advertising on iOS devices, ending a competition proceeding that had spanned nearly three years. These changes are meant to align Apple’s practices with broader market standards and ensure fair treatment of third-party app developers within its ecosystem. The regulatory action was initiated in June 2022, when the Bundeskartellamt determined that Apple holds a dominant position in multiple markets, giving it significant influence over competition. This assessment was later affirmed by the Federal Court of Justice in March 2025. The focus of the investigation centered on Apple’s App Tracking Transparency Framework, which requires third-party app providers to obtain user consent before accessing certain types of data for cross-app tracking. Under current rules, Apple defines the specific language and format of these consent prompts, which critics argue could limit transparency and user choice. According to the Bundeskartellamt, Apple’s framework allows the company to set higher privacy protections for its own services while imposing stricter conditions on external developers. This discrepancy, the regulator argued, violates Germany’s special abuse provisions for large digital platforms, which prohibit dominant firms from favoring their own products over competitors. In response, Apple has agreed to revise its consent mechanisms so that they apply consistently to both its internal services and third-party apps. The updated system will eliminate potentially misleading indicators or phrasing that might discourage users from opting into data sharing, thereby promoting clearer and more equitable user experiences. The changes will require Apple to harmonize its consent prompts across all apps, whether developed by itself or by external creators. This includes allowing app publishers to integrate Apple’s consent requests with other legally mandated data protection measures, ensuring users receive a unified and transparent view of their data usage options. The Bundeskartellamt emphasized that the goal is not to boost the rate of consent for personalized ads but rather to empower users with the ability to make informed decisions about their data. Users who choose not to share their information should face no undue barriers compared to those who opt in. The commitments reached during the settlement will remain in effect for seven years and will be overseen by an independent trustee. Apple has four months from the official notification to begin implementing the revised policies. The Bundeskartellamt noted that similar investigations in France and Italy had already resulted in substantial fines against Apple, €150 million and €98.6 million respectively, for issues related to its App Tracking Transparency Framework. These cases underscore the growing scrutiny faced by tech giants over data practices and competitive fairness. The regulator’s stance reflects a broader trend of increased oversight of major technology companies, particularly regarding data handling and market dominance. As enforcement actions continue across Europe, Apple’s adjustments may serve as a precedent for future regulatory interventions targeting data privacy and competition dynamics in the digital space. The outcome of this case highlights the ongoing tension between innovation, consumer rights, and regulatory compliance in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.

1 reports

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 906 days ago
Apple to change app data consent rules, says regulator

Apple has agreed to modify its app data consent rules for third-party applications on iOS devices following concerns raised by Germany's Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt). The regulator stated that Apple's current framework required third-party apps to use specific prompts for data collection, while Apple's own apps faced fewer restrictions. Under the new agreement, Apple will align its consent prompts for both its own apps and third-party apps, removing restrictive elements from the prompts provided to external developers. This aims to give users clearer choices regarding personalized advertising and ensure fairness between Apple's services and those of its competitors. The changes are part of a broader effort to ensure compliance with Germany's competition laws, though they do not target increasing consent rates for personalized ads.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the regulatory action taken by Germany's Federal Cartel Office against Apple in a balanced manner, focusing on the legal and competitive aspects rather than taking a stance on either side. It outlines the concerns raised by the regulator, Apple's response, and the implications,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the German competition authority's findings and Apple's commitments based on the information provided. It includes direct quotes from the authority's president and explains the changes Apple will implement. However, some details like the exact nature of the 'symbols an

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the situation in a neutral manner, quoting officials directly and explaining both sides of the issue, Apple's framework and the regulator's concerns. The tone remains professional and avoids overt bias or emotional language.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories