"Hope," directed by Na Hong-jin, has become the fastest-selling film in South Korea this year, surpassing 2 million ticket sales within five days of its release. The film’s success has sparked intense debates among viewers, with opinions sharply divided on its quality and intent. The film, distributed by PlusM Entertainment, broke records during a three-day holiday weekend, aided by government-issued coupons that offered 6,000 won ($3.90) off each ticket. According to the Korean Film Council, "Hope" reached 2,129,723 admissions as of Monday morning, outpacing previous records set by "The King's Warden," which sold 16.9 million tickets and became the highest-grossing Korean film ever. It also surpassed "Colony," directed by Yeon Sang-ho, which took until its fifth day to hit 2 million admissions. Despite its box-office dominance, the film faces challenges in profitability. With a production budget exceeding 50 billion won, "Hope" would need to sell nearly 20 million tickets to break even domestically, a feat unmatched in South Korean cinema. However, record presales in over 200 international territories have reportedly eased financial pressure. Audience reactions have been deeply polarized. Naver's audience score shows a stark division, with 53% of users giving the film top marks of 9 or 10, while 23% awarded scores of 1 or 2. On Watcha, the average rating stands at 3.1 out of 5. Critics argue that the film lacks exposition and worldbuilding, particularly regarding the origins and motives of the alien creatures. Some viewers found the dialogue overly profane, with estimates suggesting around 173 instances of the word “f***” in the script. Others criticized the abrupt ending, which leaves unresolved tensions after 160 minutes of buildup. The film appears intentionally designed as a satirical take on the blockbuster genre, blending absurdity with a large-scale budget. This approach has led to confusion among viewers who expected a conventional monster thriller. The film’s unconventional narrative style, including its minimalistic storytelling and deliberate gaps in plot, has left many feeling disoriented or unfulfilled. Critics and fellow filmmakers, however, have generally praised the film’s boldness and energetic execution. At its Cannes premiere, the film received largely positive reviews, with many lauding its innovative structure and fearless direction. Notable figures in South Korean cinema, such as Bong Joon-ho, the director of "Parasite," and Lee Chang-dong, a respected arthouse filmmaker, have publicly endorsed the film, calling it a daring and creative work. Social media platforms have seen growing tension, with some viewers accusing critics and industry professionals of colluding to elevate the film’s status. These accusations intensified when Cine21, a prominent film magazine, removed a one-star review and low rating from a critic, only to restore it the following day, citing a misunderstanding with the reviewer. This controversy echoes past experiences with Na Hong-jin’s films. His 2016 horror thriller "The Wailing" initially faced backlash for its ambiguity and slow pacing, with some viewers leaving screenings early. Despite the initial criticism, the film eventually gained widespread recognition and commercial success. As "Hope" continues its theatrical run, the debate over its artistic merit and audience appeal shows no signs of abating. The film’s unique blend of satire and spectacle has captivated some while alienating others, marking it as one of the most contentious releases in recent South Korean cinema history.
2 reports
The Korea HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago 'Hope' is on a roll at the Korean box office. Viewers are arguing over what they just watchedNa Hong-jin's film 'Hope' has become the fastest-selling movie in South Korea this year, surpassing 2 million admissions within five days of its release. Despite its commercial success, the film has sparked intense debate among viewers, with strong divisions in audience reactions. Some praise its unconventional storytelling and experimental approach, while others criticize its lack of exposition, excessive profanity, and unresolved ending. The film's budget is estimated at over 50 billion won, and it faces significant challenges in achieving profitability. Critics and notable directors, including Bong Joon-ho, have praised the film's bold style and energy.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a cultural phenomenon—the performance and reception of a film—without engaging in political commentary, advocacy, or biased framing. It presents both positive and negative viewer feedback and contextualizes the film's financial aspects without taking a stance.
Why factuality (85): The article provides accurate information about the box office performance of 'Hope,' citing specific numbers from the Korean Film Council and comparing it to previous records. It mentions the impact of government coupons and the budgetary considerations, which align with typical industry reporting.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the polarized reactions to the film in a balanced manner, noting both high and low scores without taking sides. However, the phrasing 'everyone is talking about
The Korea HeraldIndependentCenter4 days ago Will Spider-Man knock 'Hope' off its perch?The upcoming Marvel movie 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' is set to open in South Korea on July 29, with over 357,000 tickets already booked, placing it at the top of the presales chart. This positions it as a strong contender to challenge the current box office leader, 'Hope,' which has dominated the market since its release on July 15. While 'Hope' has seen a decline in daily attendance after its initial success, 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' is expected to perform well, drawing comparisons to previous successful Marvel films like 'No Way Home.' However, 'Hope' continues to maintain a significant lead in total ticket sales, though its performance has shown signs of slowing down. Audience reactions to 'Hope' remain divided, with mixed reviews on platforms like Naver and Watcha.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about box office performances and audience reactions to two movies without taking a clear ideological stance. It provides balanced reporting on both films' successes and challenges without favoring one side over the other.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter