ON
← Back to feed
Apartheid was a crime against humanity, Kallie Kriel's denial deserves damnation
ZA🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 days ago

Apartheid was a crime against humanity, Kallie Kriel's denial deserves damnation

The article criticizes Kallie Kriel of AfriForum for denying that apartheid constituted a crime against humanity, arguing that such a stance is morally indefensible and racially insensitive. The author condemns Kriel's claim that apartheid was merely a 'wrong' rather than a systemic, institutionalized form of racism that led to widespread suffering, including forced removals, imprisonment without trial, and the dehumanization of Black South Africans. The piece emphasizes the historical and legal consensus that apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations, and accuses Kriel of perpetuating white supremacist ideologies through his work with AfriForum. The tone is strongly condemnatory, portraying Kriel as an apartheid apologist who benefits from the legacy of the regime.

Apartheid was a crime against humanity, Kallie Kriel’s denial deserves damnation Carl Niehaus | Published 58 minutes ago Kallie Kriel of AfriForum has the unspeakable, sickening temerity to declare that apartheid was not a crime against humanity. He sits in front of cameras, looks Black South Africans in the face, and reduces the systematic destruction of millions of lives, the institutionalised racist dehumanisation of an entire people, the detention cells that were nothing less than torture chambers, the forced removals, the indefinite detentions without trial, the murders in cold blood, and the calculated crushing of human dignity to some lesser offence, a mere “wrong,” not worthy of the designation that the United Nations itself affixed to it decades ago. This is not historical debate. This is moral filth. This is the callousness of a man who has never felt the boot of the system he now seeks to minimise, and who still benefits from the privileges that system entrenched for people like him. It is the voice of unrepentant racial arrogance dressed up as intellectual distinction. It is an insult so profound that it constitutes, in spirit and in effect, a continuing crime against the memory of the dead and the living survivors. Kriel, who leads the AfriForum organisation, has spent his career defending and promoting white privilege and white supremacy. His actions and rhetoric align with efforts to uphold the legacy of a system that systematically oppressed Black South Africans. Despite attempts to frame his statements as nuanced or respectful, the underlying message remains clear: he seeks to downplay the atrocities committed during apartheid, even as they remain etched into the nation’s history and conscience. The implications of such a stance extend beyond academic discourse; they touch upon the very essence of justice, reconciliation, and national identity. Apartheid was not an unfortunate policy error or a regrettable chapter that can be waved away with semantic games about body counts. It was institutionalised racist dehumanisation written into the statute books of a state that declared Black people less than fully human. It stripped an entire people of the franchise, of citizenship in the land of their birth, of the right to own land in the greater part of their own country, of the right to move freely, to live where they chose, to marry whom they loved, to educate their children without restriction, and to walk the streets without a pass book that could send them to prison on a whim. It was the Group Areas Act that tore families from their homes and dumped them in barren townships and Bantustans. It was the forced removals that destroyed communities from District Six to Sophiatown, from Pageview to the Eastern Cape and beyond, millions of lives uprooted, homes bulldozed, livelihoods shattered, dignity trampled into the dust under the boots of the South African Police and the army. It was the Bantu Education system deliberately designed by Hendrik Verwoerd to produce servants and labourers, not citizens capable of challenging white domination. It was the pass laws that criminalised Black existence itself. It was the entire architecture of a racial hierarchy enforced by law, by gun, by sjambok, by electric shock, by solitary confinement, and by the security police who operated as a death squad in uniform. And then there was the violence that sustained this system of racial tyranny, violence so systematic, so cold-blooded, and so widespread that only a moral imbecile or a deliberate apologist could deny its character as a crime against humanity. The Terrorism Act of 1967, particularly Section 6, and later the Internal Security Act of 1982, Section 29, authorised indefinite detention without trial. People simply disappeared into the cells of John Vorster Square, Pretoria Central, and countless other torture chambers across the country. No charge. No lawyer. No family visits. No end date. Only interrogation, isolation, sleep deprivation, beatings, electric shocks, waterboarding, and the systematic breaking of the human spirit and body. Steve Bantu Biko was beaten to death. His murder was not an isolated incident but a grim symbol of the brutality inflicted upon those who dared to resist the regime.

1 reports

IOL (Independent Online) logoIOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedProgressiveFactual 90Objective 452 days ago
Apartheid was a crime against humanity, Kallie Kriel's denial deserves damnation

The article criticizes Kallie Kriel of AfriForum for denying that apartheid constituted a crime against humanity, arguing that such a stance is morally indefensible and racially insensitive. The author condemns Kriel's claim that apartheid was merely a 'wrong' rather than a systemic, institutionalized form of racism that led to widespread suffering, including forced removals, imprisonment without trial, and the dehumanization of Black South Africans. The piece emphasizes the historical and legal consensus that apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations, and accuses Kriel of perpetuating white supremacist ideologies through his work with AfriForum. The tone is strongly condemnatory, portraying Kriel as an apartheid apologist who benefits from the legacy of the regime.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Kallie Kriel's denial of apartheid as a moral failing and a continuation of racial injustice, using emotionally charged language and emphasizing the systemic nature of apartheid's atrocities. The focus on the historical and international recognition of apartheid as a crime against

Why factuality (90): The article presents a strong argument that apartheid was a crime against humanity based on widely accepted international definitions and historical consensus. It references the UN's classification of apartheid as such, aligning with cross-source agreement. However, it lacks direct citation of speci

Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly confrontational and uses emotive language to condemn Kallie Kriel's position. The author frames the issue as a moral failing rather than presenting a balanced discussion of differing viewpoints. There is no attempt to engage with counterarguments or provide nuance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories