ON
← Back to feed
Anthropic suspends access to latest AI models following US order
BE💻 Technology16 days ago

Anthropic suspends access to latest AI models following US order

U.S. AI company Anthropic has disabled access to its latest AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, for all non-U.S. users following an order from the American government. The company stated that the decision was made to ensure compliance with export controls, which were imposed due to concerns about potential vulnerabilities in the models' built-in safeguards. Anthropic expressed disagreement with the government's reasoning, stating that the evidence provided was limited to a narrow, non-universal jailbreak scenario. The company had previously granted limited access to Mythos Preview to trusted tech and cyber firms to enhance cyber defenses.

The United States government has imposed restrictions on Anthropic, a prominent American artificial intelligence company, preventing its two most advanced AI models from being accessible to users outside the country. The affected models, known as Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5, were launched just days prior to the announcement. These models have been placed under export control regulations, which means they can no longer be accessed by foreign governments, businesses, or individuals without explicit permission, even if they are located within the United States. This decision applies to all users, including employees of Anthropic who hold non-American passports. As a result, Anthropic had to abruptly disable these models for all customers, including U.S. citizens and its own staff.

Anthropic described the situation as a misunderstanding and expressed its intention to restore access to the models as soon as possible. According to the company's statement, the directive came from the U.S. Department of Commerce, citing national security concerns. The restriction highlights the growing tension between technological advancement and regulatory oversight, particularly concerning the potential misuse of powerful AI systems.

This move comes amid heightened awareness about the capabilities of Anthropic's AI models. Earlier discussions had already raised concerns regarding Mythos, which demonstrated an ability to rapidly identify vulnerabilities in software security. Authorities fear that such technology could become a potent tool for cybercriminals if left unchecked. In response, Anthropic had previously shared access to these models with organizations responsible for critical infrastructure, allowing them to address potential weaknesses before malicious actors could exploit them.

Despite these precautions, Anthropic acknowledges the possibility that these safeguards might be compromised—a process known as "jailbreaking," where software limitations are bypassed. To mitigate risks associated with such breaches, the company implemented a layered defense strategy. This includes making jailbreak attempts either more limited or significantly costly while also employing extensive monitoring to detect and respond to successful attacks promptly. Additionally, Anthropic introduced a 30-day data retention period for customer information, enabling further investigation into any potential threats.

While Anthropic adheres to the government's requirements, it does not endorse the decision to block access to models used by hundreds of millions of people. The company argues that there is currently no justification for preemptively blocking these models based on what it describes as insufficient evidence of widespread jailbreak incidents. It emphasizes that the U.S. government has only provided verbal proof of a "potential, limited, non-universal" jailbreak so far.

The impact of this action extends beyond Anthropic itself, sparking broader conversations about European reliance on American technology. Recent developments have prompted calls for Europe to expedite its efforts to develop its own state-of-the-art AI models. Discussions among European Union leaders suggest that they are increasingly aware of their dependence on U.S.-based technologies and are seeking ways to reduce this reliance. This realization has led some European officials to advocate for stronger partnerships with other nations, such as Brazil and South Korea, to bolster their technological independence.

In light of these circumstances, upcoming meetings involving top AI executives and global leaders are anticipated to address these issues. The G7 summit, scheduled shortly after the incident, is expected to bring together influential figures from both the public and private sectors to discuss strategies aimed at ensuring secure and equitable access to advanced AI technologies worldwide. These discussions will likely focus on balancing innovation with necessary security measures while addressing concerns related to international cooperation and competition in the field of artificial intelligence.

7 reports

VRT NWS logoVRT NWSState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 8520 days ago
US forces Anthropic to shut down best AI models: "Wake up call for Europe"

The article reports on VS forcing Anthropic to disable its best AI models, describing it as a 'wake-up call for Europe.'

Bias read (Center): The headline presents a factual event without overtly biased language or framing. The phrase 'wake-up call for Europe' could imply a critical perspective but does not strongly indicate a political lean due to lack of additional context.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): This article closely follows the primary source document, quoting Anthropic directly and providing precise details like model names and the U.S. Department of Commerce's involvement. The tone remains mostly neutral despite some commentary from an expert.

Politico Europe logoPolitico EuropeIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8016 days ago
West plays nice on AI in bid to shut out China

European Union leaders are preparing to meet with leading AI companies following tensions surrounding Anthropic's suspension of access to advanced AI models due to U.S. export controls. The situation has raised concerns about Europe's reliance on American technology and has prompted discussions about accelerating the development of European AI capabilities. In response to these challenges, the EU is seeking to strengthen technological partnerships with countries like Brazil and South Korea.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on the EU's strategic moves regarding AI development and international partnerships, providing balanced coverage of the situation without using biased language or emphasizing one side over另一

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article accurately summarizes the situation with Anthropic and the U.S. order. It references the primary source directly and includes relevant background on EU responses. However, it leans slightly toward emphasizing European concerns.

Politico Europe logoPolitico EuropeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7524 days ago
Lawmakers pile pressure on Commission over AI envoy appointment

Politico Europe reports on European lawmakers increasing pressure on the European Commission regarding the appointment of an AI envoy. The article also covers related topics including US export controls on Anthropic leading to concerns about EU reliance on American AI technology, the EU seeking partnerships with Brazil and South Korea to counter US tech dominance, and criticism surrounding Ursula von der Leyen's choice for her AI advisory role due to potential conflicts of interest.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes information about European lawmakers' actions, US export controls affecting Anthropic, the EU's efforts to build international tech partnerships, and criticisms of von der Leyen's AI advisor selection. There is

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately conveys the U.S. order and its impact on Anthropic. It includes direct quotes from Anthropic and provides context on EU reactions. However, it focuses more on EU responses than on the full scope of the event.

Politico Europe logoPolitico EuropeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 days ago
Le choc Anthropic secoue le G7

The article discusses a meeting between G7 leaders and top executives from major artificial intelligence companies, scheduled for Wednesday in Evian. This meeting has drawn significant attention following the U.S. administration's recent action forcing Anthropic to disable its most advanced AI models. The event has sparked reactions in France, where both current leaders and presidential candidates have called for European awakening in response to American dominance in the tech sector.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the meeting and the reactions from French officials and candidates without using biased language or selectively emphasizing one perspective over another.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the U.S. action against Anthropic but frames it as a 'shock' to the G7 and emphasizes European reactions. It includes quotes from POLITICO journalists but lacks specific details from the primary source.

Politico Europe logoPolitico EuropeIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7020 days ago
Anthropic suspends access to latest AI models following US order

U.S. AI company Anthropic has disabled access to its latest AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, for all non-U.S. users following an order from the American government. The company stated that the decision was made to ensure compliance with export controls, which were imposed due to concerns about potential vulnerabilities in the models' built-in safeguards. Anthropic expressed disagreement with the government's reasoning, stating that the evidence provided was limited to a narrow, non-universal jailbreak scenario. The company had previously granted limited access to Mythos Preview to trusted tech and cyber firms to enhance cyber defenses.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of Anthropic's actions and the reasons provided by the company, without evident editorializing or biased language. It includes direct quotes from Anthropic and mentions the company's disagreement with the government's order, maintaining a balanced perspective.

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article is factually sound but lacks specific details from the primary source. It mentions the U.S. blocking foreign access to Anthropic models but doesn't elaborate on the reasons or consequences as thoroughly as the primary source.

De Morgen logoDe MorgenIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6020 days ago
US restricting foreign access to Anthropic's best AI models

The United States is restricting foreign access to the best AI models developed by Anthropic.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a policy decision without overtly favoring one side. It does not include explicit commentary, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.

Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): The headline is factually correct but vague. The article does not provide detailed information beyond the U.S. restricting access to Anthropic's models. It lacks depth and context compared to the primary source.

De Morgen logoDe MorgenIndependentCenter19 days ago
White House blocks foreign access to AI models Anthropic after security issues

The Dutch government has blocked foreign access to AI models developed by Anthropic following security concerns.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a government decision regarding AI model access without apparent ideological framing or biased language. It focuses on the action taken rather than taking a stance on the issue.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories