ON
← Back to feed
ANSES complied with the court ruling and resumed the payment of the pension to Cristina Kirchner: $ 16,090,877
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

ANSES complied with the court ruling and resumed the payment of the pension to Cristina Kirchner: $ 16,090,877

The Argentine National Agency for Social Security (ANSES) resumed paying Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (CFK) her lifetime pension after a court ruling. The decision was based on a judicial order issued by Judges Juan Fantini and Sebastián Russo, which temporarily reinstated the payment. This followed an administrative suspension by ANSES after CFK was convicted in a corruption case known as 'Vialidad.' The pension amount was $16,090,877 gross, with net payments around $12 million after a 20% deduction. ANSES clarified that future adjustments would depend on wage changes outside their jurisdiction, leaving the final amount to be determined by the judiciary.

The Argentine National Administration of Social Security (ANSES) has resumed the payment of a monthly pension to former President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, amounting to approximately $16.090.877. This decision follows a judicial ruling issued by the Third Chamber of the Federal Court of Social Security, which mandated the reinstatement of the benefit. The order was signed by judges Juan Fantini and Sebastián Russo through a precautionary measure in February of this year. It directed the temporary resumption of payments for one of the two special benefits previously suspended by ANSES at the end of last year. The suspension had occurred after the confirmation of a criminal conviction against the former head of state in the case known as "Vialidad." This led to legal action initiated by Kirchner, seeking the restoration of the economic benefit while the court continues to deliberate on the main proceedings. At the heart of the dispute lies whether these benefits should continue to be received by someone convicted of corruption, given that the Supreme Court of Justice has already confirmed the conviction as final. ANSES responded to official requests for public information, confirming that the benefit number 47-6-8085213-0 was restored with a monthly payment starting in August 2026, totaling $16.090.877.01 before deductions. The agency stated that automatic processing would handle the legal withholdings for health insurance and income tax. The judicial ruling relied on "alimentary reasons," without addressing the six-year prison sentence imposed on Kirchner. The amount disbursed corresponds to the pension derived from her late husband, former President Néstor Kirchner. After applying a 20 percent deduction from the monthly allowance under Resolution 343 of 2025 aimed at recovering 20 percent of improperly received sums, the net amount reaches around $12 million. ANSES did not include the southern zone allowance that Kirchner previously received based on her declared residence in Santa Cruz province. It clarified that future adjustments will depend on salary changes outside the scope of the organization, meaning the final amount she receives will be determined by the courts. The precautionary measure overturned an initial adverse ruling by Judge Karina Alonso Candis, who had justified her decision based on alimentary considerations without addressing the six-year prison sentence against the beneficiary. According to a report by prosecutor Eduardo Casal, this situation should have halted the payment of social security funds. However, the higher court of social security denied the possibility of elevating the issue through an extraordinary appeal. In response, ANSES and the Public Prosecutor's Office filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of Justice to overturn the precautionary measure. The final payment was facilitated in July after the court accepted a sworn guarantee presented by Kirchner. Meanwhile, the government seeks to recover debts amounting to $660.052.338.87 related to previous periods. Another legal proceeding initiated by former deputy Graciela Ocaña concerns the incompatibility of simultaneously receiving two benefits under Law 24.018. The resumption of the pension highlights ongoing legal complexities surrounding the rights of individuals facing criminal convictions to receive social security benefits. As the judicial process unfolds, the determination of the final amount Kirchner will receive remains subject to further legal deliberation.

1 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 60yesterday
ANSES complied with the court ruling and resumed the payment of the pension to Cristina Kirchner: $ 16,090,877

The Argentine National Agency for Social Security (ANSES) resumed paying Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (CFK) her lifetime pension after a court ruling. The decision was based on a judicial order issued by Judges Juan Fantini and Sebastián Russo, which temporarily reinstated the payment. This followed an administrative suspension by ANSES after CFK was convicted in a corruption case known as 'Vialidad.' The pension amount was $16,090,877 gross, with net payments around $12 million after a 20% deduction. ANSES clarified that future adjustments would depend on wage changes outside their jurisdiction, leaving the final amount to be determined by the judiciary.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the resumption of the pension as a legal victory for CFK, emphasizing the judicial process and the administrative suspension linked to her criminal conviction. While it presents facts neutrally, the focus on the judicial reversal of ANSES’ decision and the mention of the 'motivos'

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the amount paid ($16.090.877), the court ruling by judges Fantini and Russo, and references to the legal process involving the Supreme Court. These align with what would be expected from a cross-source consensus on this event. However, some contextual el

Why objectivity (60): The article includes a biased statement at the end, 'Esto no les gusta a los autoritarios', which introduces an ideological tone rather than maintaining neutrality. The rest of the piece presents facts but occasionally uses phrasing that implies judgment, such as referring to those who disagree as '

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories