ON
← Back to feed
Anxiety and smoke in the most real 'simulator' at the gas station: "Suddenly, we were told to run and walk down 26 floors"
Spain🏛️ Politics13 days ago

Anxiety and smoke in the most real 'simulator' at the gas station: "Suddenly, we were told to run and walk down 26 floors"

A fire broke out in the Moeve Tower, a 248-meter skyscraper located north of Madrid's Castellana avenue, which was previously known as the Cepsa Tower. The blaze, originating from an electrical fault in technical equipment between floors 23 and 24, caused the evacuation of the building, which houses offices for energy company Moeve, Amazon, and law firm Pérez-Llorca. Employees described the situation as chaotic but noted that the building's frequent emergency drills helped maintain order during the evacuation. Three people were confined inside, while three others received medical attention. The fire produced thick smoke visible across Madrid, though some residents reported hearing an explosion, which workers inside did not confirm.

A fire broke out in the 25th floor of the Moeve Tower in Madrid on June 23, 2026, prompting the evacuation of the entire skyscraper. The incident began around mid-afternoon when electrical equipment in the technical area triggered flames and thick smoke. Employees inside the building were initially uncertain whether this was another drill, as they had participated in numerous simulations over the years. However, the sudden appearance of smoke and visible flames quickly dispelled any doubts about the authenticity of the emergency.

The Moeve Tower, standing 248 meters tall, is located north of the Paseo de la Castellana and has long been known as the former Cepsa Tower, or the Gasoline Tower. It currently serves as the headquarters for the energy company Moeve, which is owned by Amancio Ortega. Other tenants include Amazon and the law firm Pérez-Llorca. The fire originated in a technical zone between floors 23 and 24, where electrical devices and machinery essential to the tower's operation were housed. According to emergency services, the cause of the fire was electrical in nature.

Employees who were present during the incident described the chaos that ensued. One worker, identified as Juan, was on the seventh floor when the emergency started. He did not see the fire but received immediate updates from colleagues working higher up. “I have coworkers on the 19th floor who simply smelled strong smoke, and two minutes after that, the alarm went off,” he said. Despite initial confusion, occupants remained calm and completed the evacuation within approximately 20 minutes. People descended the stairs in an orderly manner, one floor at a time, without incidents or injuries.

Enrique Rodríguez, a worker based on the 31st floor, confirmed that there was no explosion heard from inside the building, contrary to reports from some nearby residents. He and others evacuated down to the ground level, navigating more than 30 floors on foot. Emergency protocols ensured that regular elevators were disabled during the evacuation, leaving only those designated for individuals with mobility issues and emergency personnel operational. Rodríguez noted that all procedures functioned correctly, allowing them to descend safely in just 18 minutes.

During the evacuation, three individuals were confined in a shelter on the 27th floor. Firefighters maintained communication with these individuals via telephone and monitored their condition using security cameras until they could reach the location and evacuate them. All three were eventually removed from the building and were reported to be safe.

Emergency medical services attended to two workers suffering from mild smoke inhalation and a passerby who experienced an anxiety attack. None required hospitalization. The fire was extinguished by 6:35 PM, although emergency teams continued to monitor the situation for several hours afterward.

The incident highlights the importance of regular drills and preparedness among the building’s occupants. Workers emphasized that their familiarity with emergency procedures played a crucial role in maintaining order and ensuring a swift response. The Moeve Tower remains a significant landmark in Madrid, housing multiple companies and serving as a symbol of modern infrastructure. The fire has raised questions about safety measures and the potential risks associated with high-rise buildings, especially those housing critical operations and large numbers of employees.

As investigations continue into the exact cause of the fire and the effectiveness of the building’s safety systems, officials are likely to review current protocols and consider any necessary upgrades. The incident will also prompt discussions about the adequacy of emergency planning in similar structures across the city. For now, the focus remains on the well-being of those affected and the thorough assessment of the damage caused by the blaze.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 8013 days ago
Anxiety and smoke in the most real 'simulator' at the gas station: "Suddenly, we were told to run and walk down 26 floors"

A fire broke out in the Moeve Tower, a 248-meter skyscraper located north of Madrid's Castellana avenue, which was previously known as the Cepsa Tower. The blaze, originating from an electrical fault in technical equipment between floors 23 and 24, caused the evacuation of the building, which houses offices for energy company Moeve, Amazon, and law firm Pérez-Llorca. Employees described the situation as chaotic but noted that the building's frequent emergency drills helped maintain order during the evacuation. Three people were confined inside, while three others received medical attention. The fire produced thick smoke visible across Madrid, though some residents reported hearing an explosion, which workers inside did not confirm.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a fire incident in a commercial building with no direct political implications. While the building is owned by Amancio Ortega, a prominent businessman, there is no indication of political bias in the reporting. The content is primarily descriptive, focusing on the event itself

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides detailed accounts from employees and mentions the building's history and ownership, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It reports on the evacuation process and number of people affected. The tone remains neutral but includes some subjective quotes like 'más real en la tor

20minutos logo20minutosIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8513 days ago
A fire on the 25th floor of the Moeve tower forced the evacuation of the skyscraper and left three people affected

A fire broke out on the 25th floor of the Moeve Tower, leading to the evacuation of the skyscraper. Three people were affected by the incident. The situation was managed with emergency services responding promptly to ensure safety. No further details about the cause of the fire or injuries have been provided in the available information.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a fire incident at a building, which is an event related to public safety but does not involve political figures, policies, or contentious issues. There is no indication of political framing or bias in the content provided.

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 85): This article is concise and confirms the location, impact, and number of affected individuals as reported by other sources. It avoids detailed personal accounts and maintains a neutral tone, though it lacks some contextual information present in the first article.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories