Attacks on Yandex: Burning data centers in Russia will not cause bot failure in the AfD
A rumor circulating on social media and in some outlets claims that recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian data centers have reduced the activity of right-wing social bots supporting parties like Germany’s AfD. However, this claim has no evidence to support it and appears to stem from confusion over what constitutes a bot. The alleged decline in bot activity specifically relates to traffic from Russia’s Yandex network, which operates cloud services experiencing significant issues. According to Cloudflare, global bot traffic, including non-social-media bots, has not significantly decreased. Social bots, which aim to mimic human behavior in online platforms, are harder to track and may not be fully captured by monitoring systems. While Ukraine’s attacks seem to have disrupted internet connectivity within Russia, particularly affecting Yandex-dependent services, there is no clear evidence linking these disruptions to a reduction in right-wing propaganda bots.
A false AI-generated graphic suggesting a decline in social media bot activity supporting Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has circulated online, according to reports. The claim, which originated from statements made by Robin Schlingheider, a member of the Green Party’s municipal council, and Tomáš Zdechovský, a conservative Czech European Parliament member, has been widely shared despite lacking verifiable evidence. The alleged drop in bot traffic was linked to recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian data centers, with some media outlets such as Standard and Focus amplifying the narrative. However, this assertion does not hold up under scrutiny. According to Cloudflare, a U.S.-based cloud services provider, there has been no significant overall decrease in bot traffic within Russia. The reduction observed relates specifically to the autonomous system AS13238, part of the Yandex network, which operates search engines and cloud services. Bot traffic encompasses a wide range of automated processes, including web crawlers used by search engines, server-to-server communications, API access, and security scanning bots. These non-human activities constitute more than half of global internet traffic. Social bots, however, differ because they attempt to mimic human behavior in social networks. As a result, monitoring systems like Cloudflare may not detect them effectively. Ukraine’s strategy of targeting Russian data centers appears to have disrupted connectivity and reduced traffic from specific data centers. Within Russia, complaints about failed payment apps, mapping services, and websites dependent on Yandex infrastructure have increased. Yet these disruptions do not necessarily translate into a measurable decline in social bot activity, which remains difficult to quantify. Doubts about the validity of the circulating graphic were raised early on by users on Reddit, the account antibot4navalny on Bluesky, and Raphael Wimmer, an informatics professor at the University of Regensburg. Wimmer questioned whether the image might have been generated using artificial intelligence and asked Schlingheider for its source. Schlingheider reportedly blocked him on Threads after the inquiry. A press request from netzpolitik.org regarding the graphic’s origin has yet to receive a response from Schlingheider. The Center for Monitoring, Analysis and Strategy (CeMAS), which tracks disinformation, right-wing extremism, antisemitism, and conspiracy theories on social media, expressed skepticism about claims of declining bot activity. Its director, Josef Holnburger, noted that his organization had not detected a noticeable drop in likes and retweets from inorganic sources. He added that it might still be too early to determine the impact of recent developments.
The article discusses how a false AI-generated graphic depicting bots associated with Germany's Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party went viral in Russia. The image was part of a broader disinformation campaign targeting Yandex, a major Russian search engine, which faced attacks linked to foreign interference. The piece explores how such manipulated content spreads online, particularly within Russian digital spaces, and highlights concerns over the influence of AI tools in amplifying misinformation. It provides insight into the tactics used by actors seeking to manipulate public opinion through deepfakes and synthetic media. The article emphasizes the challenges of identifying and countering such disinformation, especially in politically sensitive contexts.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced examination of the spread of AI-generated disinformation involving political entities (AfD) and its implications in Russia. There is no overtly biased language, and the focus is on analyzing the mechanisms of disinformation rather than taking a stance on any political
A rumor circulating on social media and in some outlets claims that recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian data centers have reduced the activity of right-wing social bots supporting parties like Germany’s AfD. However, this claim has no evidence to support it and appears to stem from confusion over what constitutes a bot. The alleged decline in bot activity specifically relates to traffic from Russia’s Yandex network, which operates cloud services experiencing significant issues. According to Cloudflare, global bot traffic, including non-social-media bots, has not significantly decreased. Social bots, which aim to mimic human behavior in online platforms, are harder to track and may not be fully captured by monitoring systems. While Ukraine’s attacks seem to have disrupted internet connectivity within Russia, particularly affecting Yandex-dependent services, there is no clear evidence linking these disruptions to a reduction in right-wing propaganda bots.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view, debunking a rumor without taking sides politically. It explains technical aspects of bot traffic and clarifies misunderstandings without favoring any political group or ideology. The tone remains neutral, focusing on factual clarification rather than advocacy.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.