A recent incident in the European Parliament sparked widespread outrage among lawmakers, civil society organizations, and human rights advocates. During a session held on Wednesday, right-wing Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) celebrated the passage of a contentious migration law by chanting "send them back," a phrase that immediately drew sharp criticism from their counterparts. The vote, which passed with 418 in favor and 218 against, aims to increase deportations of undocumented individuals across the EU. The decision has ignited fierce debate about the implications of the legislation, particularly regarding its compliance with international human rights standards.
The proposed changes include provisions that allow for the detention of undocumented migrants for up to two years and the establishment of offshore centers, which critics argue could become "human rights black holes." Additionally, the legislation opens the door for immigration enforcement practices similar to those employed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). These measures have drawn condemnation from several human rights organizations, including Amnesty International France, which labeled the plan "absurd, cruel and discriminatory." Sixteen United Nations experts have also raised concerns, stating that the new rules could violate multiple aspects of international human rights law.
The parliamentary session became a flashpoint for ideological division, reflecting broader shifts within the EU's political landscape. Following the 2024 elections, the European Parliament saw a significant rise in the number of nationalist and far-right representatives. As these lawmakers aligned to support the new migration policies, their celebratory chants were met with immediate backlash. Centre-left and left-wing politicians responded with cries of "shame on you," highlighting the growing polarization within the institution.
Several prominent figures expressed strong disapproval of the far-right's reaction to the vote. Javi López, a Socialist and vice-president of the European Parliament, called the session "disgraceful" and criticized the notion of treating people as mere objects to be deported. Manus Carlisle, representing the Left group in the Parliament, described the moment as a "dark moment that is likely to go down in EU history." Laurence Farreng, a French Renew MEP, noted that the event marked a moment where "the far right is screaming its hatred."
Ilaria Salis, an Italian MEP associated with the Green and Left Alliance, voiced her horror at the situation, emphasizing the dehumanizing nature of the far-right's actions. She warned that such attitudes reflect a creeping form of fascism within democratic institutions, targeting migrants and racialized communities as primary scapegoats. Salis further cautioned that if current trends continue, the focus of discrimination might soon extend beyond migrants to include the working class, activists, and others deemed non-conformist.
While many on the left condemned the far-right's response, some right-wing leaders welcomed the outcome. Herbert Kickl, head of Austria's far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ), viewed the moment as a sign of the influence of right-wing lawmakers. He emphasized that the use of the slogan "send them back" indicated that pressure from the right was beginning to yield results, although he acknowledged that this was merely the beginning of a larger movement.
In parallel developments, Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has advocated for the creation of "return hubs" for irregular migrants outside of Europe, suggesting that such facilities could be operational by next year. This proposal aligns with the broader trend of exploring external solutions to migration challenges, a strategy that has gained traction among several EU member states.
Meanwhile, discussions about migration and integration have taken on personal dimensions, as illustrated by the experiences of individuals like Rafał, a Polish migrant who moved to the UK in 2007 seeking better economic opportunities. His journey reflects the complex interplay between migration, identity, and the evolving dynamics of multicultural societies. Over the years, Rafał's perspective has shifted, mirroring the changing sentiments of the communities he interacts with, highlighting the nuanced realities of migration and its impact on both migrants and host populations.
3 reports
The Guardian (World)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8515 days agoRightwing Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) faced criticism after chanting 'send them back' following a vote to increase deportations of undocumented individuals across the EU. The vote passed 418 to 218, with the new policies facing condemnation from rights organizations such as Amnesty International France and 16 UN experts. Critics argue the proposals could violate international human rights standards, including potential indefinite detention and the establishment of offshore centers. The debate turned confrontational when rightwing MEPs celebrated the decision with chants, only for
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the event without overtly favoring either side. It describes the actions of both rightwing and leftwing MEPs, quotes critics of the policy, and outlines the proposed changes without editorializing.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with clear details about the EU migration law vote, the 'send them back' chants, and reactions from rights groups. Some descriptive language like 'hearty applause' and 'disgraceful' may slightly affect objectivity.
Financial TimesIndependent🔒Right11 days agoDenmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has proposed the establishment of 'return hubs' for irregular migrants outside the European Union, potentially allowing the EU to operate deportation centers beyond its borders by next year. This initiative aims to streamline the process of returning undocumented immigrants to their countries of origin. The proposal comes amid ongoing debates over migration policies within the EU and reflects Denmark's approach to managing immigration. Such centers would likely involve cooperation with non-EU countries to facilitate deportations more efficiently.
Bias read (Right): The article highlights a policy proposal from a Danish prime minister focused on stricter immigration control, which aligns with right-leaning approaches to migration management. The emphasis on deportation centers suggests a framing that prioritizes border security and controlled immigration, which
UnHerdIndependentRight11 days agoThe article explores the experiences of Polish immigrants in the UK, focusing on Rafał, a Polish migrant who moved to England in 2007 after the EU expansion allowed free movement. Initially, he found economic opportunities and prosperity, which he describes as an 'easy life.' However, the narrative shifts to examine the changing demographics in areas like Peterborough, where Polish communities have become prominent, leading to social tensions. The article highlights concerns raised by locals, including a pub landlord, about the transformation of the area and the impact on local culture. Rafał himself begins to adopt a more critical stance toward other migrants, reflecting broader anxieties within the Polish community. The piece also references a tragic incident involving a British-Polish teenager, Henry Nowak, whose death sparked protests attended by members of the Polish community.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Polish immigration in terms of cultural displacement and social tension, using phrases such as 'the town the Poles took over' and highlighting the growing presence of non-white migrants. It presents the perspective of Polish migrants becoming increasingly wary of other immigrant群体
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United Kingdom
