Angel Reese, the WNBA star for the Atlanta Dream, appeared to contradict herself during a recent press conference, as she claimed she did not have dolls that looked like her growing up, despite previously acknowledging playing with Barbie dolls as a child. The controversy emerged after Mattel released a doll featuring Reese's likeness, including her iconic No. 5 jersey and signature sneakers, marking a milestone in representation within the toy industry. The Atlanta Dream player made headlines earlier this month when Mattel unveiled a Barbie doll modeled after her, accompanied by a special edition of her signature Reebok sneakers and a “Barbie Game Day” event at State Farm Arena. This collaboration highlighted Reese’s influence beyond basketball, extending into pop culture and consumer products. However, during a press conference this week, she expressed a sense of irony regarding the release, stating that she had not been interested in dolls as a child because they did not reflect her appearance. “I didn’t have a lot of dolls because I didn’t have dolls that really looked like me much,” Reese said. She emphasized the importance of creating a doll that accurately represented her identity, both in terms of physical features and athletic prowess. “That’s why I kind of really wanted to make sure this was super intentional, because now they have a doll that looks like you, nails and hair, but also you can be a killer on the court as well,” she added. Her remarks sparked debate, particularly given the historical context of Black representation in toys. According to reports, Black Barbie dolls were available long before Reese was born. In 1968, Mattel introduced Christie, a Black character in the Barbie universe. The first doll officially named Black Barbie came in 1980, over two decades prior to Reese’s birth in 2002. American Girl further expanded representation with Addy Walker in 1993. By 1998, Mattel had even released officially licensed African-American NBA Barbie dolls wearing authentic team uniforms, packaged with basketballs, four years before Reese was born. This historical data suggests that Black dolls resembling real athletes were already available when Reese was a child. Yet, her statement that “now they have a doll that looks like you” could imply that such representations were absent during her youth. Some interpreted her words as a subtle critique of past lack of diversity in toy manufacturing, though she did not directly address whether Black dolls existed when she was younger. Reese’s comments contrasted with a social media post from July 30, in which she openly acknowledged her childhood connection to Barbie dolls. In a heartfelt message thanking Cosmopolitan for profiling the doll, she wrote, “From playing with Barbie dolls as a little girl to having my own, wearing my signature Reebok shoes.” She described the experience of seeing children react positively to the doll as “the dream,” expressing excitement about future interactions with fans who would receive the Angel Barbie Dolls. Despite the apparent contradiction, Reese’s statements seem to stem from a desire to highlight the significance of the current release rather than dwell on past experiences. Her emphasis on intentionality in design reflects broader conversations around representation and authenticity in media and consumer goods. As the doll becomes available, its impact on young audiences, especially those who look like Reese, will likely become a focal point of discussion. For now, the focus remains on the tangible outcome of the collaboration: a doll that mirrors a real athlete, celebrating both personal identity and professional success.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
