Manila, Philippines, The Philippine government has refuted claims by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blocked his proposal for a P10,000 cash assistance program for every Filipino family. According to palace officials, the failure of the initiative lies with Cayetano's own actions rather than any obstruction from the president. During a press briefing held on July 20, 2026, Undersecretary Claire Castro stated that there was no basis for Marcos to have rejected the proposal since Cayetano had already submitted the measure prior to the president taking office. This assertion comes in response to Cayetano's recent allegations that Marcos had refused to support his plan for universal financial aid. Castro emphasized that the responsibility for the stalled proposal rests squarely on Cayetano. She pointed out that the senator had previously made similar promises while serving in Congress, yet none of these initiatives had progressed beyond the initial stages. “Senator Alan Cayetano’s shortcomings, his slow pace and inability to fulfill his promises, should not be blamed on others,” Castro remarked. To back her claims, Castro presented several newspaper articles from 2021 and 2022, which detailed Cayetano's early advocacy for the cash aid program. These documents highlighted that the proposal had been introduced well before Marcos assumed the presidency. “If a proposal is beneficial and feasible, there’s no reason it can’t be passed. And when the 2022 national budget was approved, President Marcos Jr. wasn't even President yet,” she noted. Furthermore, Castro criticized Cayetano for not fully believing in his own proposal. She suggested that even former President Rodrigo Duterte, who is considered a political ally of Cayetano, seemed skeptical about the feasibility of the P10,000 aid package. “It seems he doesn’t even believe in his own proposed bill, and it appears he hasn’t studied it thoroughly, because he’s asking for around P200 billion,” Castro said. In a separate communication via Viber, Castro accused Cayetano of spreading unfounded narratives. She argued that instead of accepting accountability for his lack of progress, the senator was deflecting blame onto others to avoid embarrassment. “Why can’t Sen. Alan Cayetano stop himself from stirring up intrigue and peddling baseless stories? Instead of acknowledging his own negligence in his duties, he points fingers at others just to save himself from embarrassment. He passes the work he fails to accomplish onto other people,” she wrote. Cayetano has faced criticism from various quarters for his handling of legislative proposals. Earlier this year, Senator Bongbong Marcos, the president's son, had called for greater accountability among lawmakers regarding their commitments. Meanwhile, some members of the opposition have expressed concern over the potential impact of unfulfilled campaign promises on public trust in the political process. The controversy surrounding the P10,000 aid proposal underscores broader issues within the legislative branch concerning the implementation of populist policies. While such programs often gain traction during election seasons, they frequently face challenges related to funding, bureaucratic hurdles, and political will once implemented. As the debate continues, attention will remain focused on whether Cayetano can provide evidence supporting his claims against the administration. The situation highlights the need for transparency and follow-through in political commitments, especially as the country navigates economic uncertainties and social challenges.
2 reports
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 6511 hr. ago Cayetano, not Marcos, to blame for failed P10,000 aid – PalaceThe Philippine presidential palace has denied Senator Alan Peter Cayetano's claim that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blocked his proposed P10,000 cash aid program for every Filipino family. According to Undersecretary Claire Castro, the failure of the proposal lies with Cayetano himself, who introduced the measure before Marcos took office and did not advance it while serving in Congress. The palace emphasized that if the proposal were viable, it would have been included in the 2022 national budget, which was approved prior to Marcos becoming president. Castro also noted that even former President Rodrigo Duterte, a political ally of Cayetano, seemed unconvinced by the plan. The palace criticized Cayetano for repeating the promise as a campaign pledge despite failing to move it forward and accused him of spreading unfounded narratives to deflect blame.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Senator Alan Peter Cayetano as responsible for the failure of his proposed aid program, attributing the issue to his 'shortcomings,' 'slow pace,' and 'inability to fulfill promises.' It criticizes him for making unfulfilled campaign promises and spreading 'baseless narratives' to诿
Why factuality (75): The article reports that Malacañang attributed the failure of the P10,000 aid proposal to Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano rather than President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., citing that the proposal was filed before Marcos took office. This aligns with the cross-source consensus that Cayetano's lack of progress an
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat confrontational, with the Palace spokesperson directly criticizing Cayetano's performance and using emotionally charged language like 'slow pace' and 'jetski campaign promise.' The article frames the issue as a political dispute between Cayetano and the administration, showing b
GMA News OnlineIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 552 days ago Alan Peter Cayetano, sinabing tinutulan ni Marcos ang P10K ayuda matapos manalo sa Eleksyon 2022The article reports that Alan Peter Cayetano accused Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of opposing the P10,000 cash assistance program after winning the 2022 elections. The claim suggests that Marcos criticized the aid initiative, which was part of a broader social welfare effort by the administration. The statement implies a political disagreement over economic policies and social support programs. No further details or context about the nature of the criticism or its implications are provided.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the accusation against Marcos as a political critique, implying that his opposition to the aid program reflects a stance that aligns with more conservative or economically cautious positions. The focus on Cayetano’s claim highlights a potential ideological divide between the two,傾
Why factuality (60): This article states that President Marcos allegedly criticized the P10K aid proposal after winning the 2022 election, but it does not provide specific evidence or quotes to support this claim. It also mentions that the proposal was previously publicized in 2021 and 2022, which is consistent with oth
Why objectivity (55): The phrasing is highly biased, suggesting that Marcos 'allegedly' criticized the proposal, implying a lack of substantiation. The article appears to take a partisan stance in favor of Cayetano, presenting the narrative without balance or neutrality.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter