Andy Burnham pledge to end indefinite jail terms ‘a step towards healing’

The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenter7 hr. ago

Andy Burnham, the UK Home Secretary, has pledged to end indefinite jail terms known as Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences during this parliamentary session. These sentences, introduced in 2005, allowed for indefinite detention of individuals deemed a risk to the public, though they were often applied to those convicted of minor offenses. Although the IPP sentence was officially abolished in 2012, the change was not made retroactive, leaving many individuals still incarcerated under these terms. As of June 2024, 856 people remain imprisoned due to IPP sentences, with eight out of ten having served at least 10 years beyond their minimum tariff. Campaign groups like Ungripp have welcomed the move as a long-overdue correction to a flawed system, though they emphasize the need for swift implementation and support for affected individuals. Former IPP prisoner Marc Conway praised the decision but expressed sorrow for those who did not live to see the reform.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the issue of ending indefinite jail terms in a balanced manner, highlighting both the concerns raised by campaigners and the government's proposed actions. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing, maintaining a neutral tone throughout.

The IndependentIndependentProgressive10 hr. ago

Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced plans to end indefinite jail terms known as Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences, calling them unjust and harmful to prisoners and their families. He emphasized that individuals who have served their time should be considered for release before those who have not completed their sentences. The government will introduce legislation to terminate these sentences by the end of the current parliamentary session. Burnham acknowledged longstanding concerns about IPP sentences, which were introduced under New Labour in 2012 but not retroactively repealed. Campaigners, such as Shirley Debono, expressed relief at the decision after years of advocacy, noting that IPP sentences have led to prolonged incarceration without clear release dates.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the abolition of IPP sentences as a moral and social justice issue, emphasizing the harm caused to prisoners and their families. It highlights the long-standing campaign by The Independent and advocates like Shirley Debono, portraying the issue as one requiring urgent governmental