Look who Luka Dončić spends his holidays with during the divorce battle (PHOTO)The article discusses Luka Dončić's recent vacation with friends after legal matters involving his former fiancée, Anamaria Goltes, were resolved. It mentions that Goltes withdrew her request for child support determination from a court in Los Angeles, noting that their children were born in Slovenia and live there with their mother. The focus shifts to Dončić enjoying a relaxing holiday on a yacht in the Adriatic Sea with fellow basketball players Luka Rupnik and Jaka Blažič, where they enjoyed food and leisure. The article also notes that Dončić will soon prepare for a visit from his Los Angeles Lakers teammates arriving in Slovenia at the end of August.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports-related event, basketball player Luka Dončić’s personal life and vacation, with no significant political content or framing. There is no evidence of biased language, one-sided sourcing, or emphasis on political issues.
Why factuality (70): The article references TMZ and provides some alignment with the primary source regarding the legal battle over child custody and the divorce. However, it introduces new details about the children living in Slovenia and the father’s efforts to spend time with them, which are supported by the primary
Why objectivity (60): While the article remains somewhat neutral, it focuses more on the personal aspects of the family life, such as the father spending time with his children, which could be seen as slightly biased in favor of the father’s perspective.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6018 days agoAnamaria Goltes, partnerka slovenskega košarkarja Luka Dončića, naj bi umaknila svojo zahtevko za določitev preživnine za njune hčerke, ki jo je vložila v Los Angelesu. Po poročilih ameriških in slovenskih medijev, ki so dostopna na strani TMZ, naj bi bila v uradnih dokumentih navedena njena izjava, da ta odločitev spremlja željo, da bi Luka in ona rešili sporno zadevo v medsebojnem dogovoru, kar bi bilo v največji korist njunim otrokom. Luka in Anamaria sta se ločila, po tem pa naj bi Anamaria vložila zahtevo za preživnino v ZDA. Dončić pa naj bi predlagal, da ta zahtevka ostane nezadostna, saj je bila vložena v ZDA in ne v Sloveniji.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal matter involving a public figure (Luka Dončić), but presents the information neutrally without evident bias. It cites sources like TMZ and mentions both parties' positions without favoring either side.
Why factuality (70): This article accurately reflects the legal developments, including the mother’s withdrawal of the alimony claim and the father’s legal arguments. It aligns closely with the primary source and provides context about the children’s upbringing in Slovenia, which is supported by the primary source.
Why objectivity (60): The article remains largely neutral, presenting both sides of the legal argument without overtly favoring either party, though it gives more weight to the father’s legal stance.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 65Objective 6019 days agoAnamaria Goltes, former fiancée of Slovenian basketball star Luka Dončić, has withdrawn her request for alimony from him at an American court. She aims to resolve the matter amicably and in the best interest of their children. The case was initially filed in California but faced opposition from Dončić’s legal team, who argued that the claim was improperly filed and that the appropriate jurisdiction was Slovenia, where the couple’s daughters reside. Dončić reportedly continues to cover all expenses related to raising their two young children. While the withdrawal halts the U.S. legal process, it does not confirm a final agreement between the parties.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, citing both Goltes’ decision to withdraw the alimony request and Dončić’s legal arguments against the U.S. jurisdiction. It avoids taking a stance on either side, focusing on the procedural aspects and the stated intentions of both parties. There is no明显
Why factuality (65): Article reports on legal disputes over child support between Luka Dončić and Anamaria Goltes, citing TMZ sources. It mentions the withdrawal of a lawsuit in California and the move to Slovenia, but does not directly quote the primary source document where Dončić confirms the divorce. The article pro
Why objectivity (60): The article presents information from multiple sources but leans slightly towards the legal conflict angle, emphasizing financial aspects and potential tensions. While it remains neutral overall, there is a focus on the dispute rather than the personal aspect of the divorce.
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 65Objective 5518 days agoAnamarija Goltes, ex-fiancee of Slovenian basketball star Luka Dončić, has withdrawn her claim for child support against him, according to reports by TMZ Sports and other media outlets. The court in Los Angeles rejected her request for dismissal because Dončić did not sign the documents. Dončić, who plays for the Los Angeles Lakers, filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the claim lacks legal basis since the children live in Slovenia while the claim was filed in California. Goltes refused to relocate with the children to California, despite efforts by Dončić and his attorney Laura Wasser. The couple married in July 2023 after dating since 2016, and they have two daughters born in 2023. Dončić recently withdrew from representing Slovenia due to family reasons, stating his daughters are his main motivation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments regarding a personal legal dispute between a celebrity and their former partner, without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both parties and reports from multiple media outlets without evident ideological slant. While the issue involves a高
Why factuality (65): The article confirms the legal dispute and the mother’s attempt to withdraw the alimony claim, which aligns with the primary source. However, it adds details about the timeline and the father’s past relationship with the mother, which are not explicitly stated in the primary source, thus introducing
Why objectivity (55): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but still frames the situation as a legal battle, which can be seen as slightly biased towards the legal aspect rather than the personal.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 5518 days agoAnamarija Goltes, former fiancée of Slovenian basketball star Luka Dončić, reportedly withdrew her court request for child support for their daughters. This was reported by TMZ Sports based on obtained court documents. The Los Angeles court allegedly rejected her request to withdraw the claim because it lacked Dončić’s signature. Dončić had previously filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the claim has no legal basis since the children live in Slovenia while the lawsuit was filed in California. According to reports, Dončić attempted to convince Goltes to move to California with the children, but she refused and has been living in Slovenia with them since May of last year. Dončić confirmed his divorce from Goltes in March during an interview with ESPN and stated that his decision not to play for the Slovenian national team this year is due to his daughters.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a personal legal matter between two individuals related to sports, with no significant political implications or framing. It provides factual information without apparent bias.
Why factuality (65): The article continues to reference TMZ and discusses the legal dispute, including the mother’s attempt to withdraw the alimony claim. While these points are aligned with the primary source, the focus on the father’s vacation and social media posts introduces elements not covered in the primary sourc
Why objectivity (55): The article emphasizes the father’s lifestyle and social activities, potentially giving him more attention than the legal aspects, which could be seen as subtly favoring his position.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 5518 days agoThe article discusses a legal dispute between Anamaria Goltes and Luka Dončić regarding child support. According to reports from the newspaper Delo, Goltes initially sought to withdraw the case from California courts, believing they were not competent to handle the matter. However, sources indicate that Goltes and her lawyers did not intend to withdraw the case but rather aimed to reach a mutual agreement with Dončić. They assessed that California courts would likely dismiss the case due to jurisdiction issues. The article notes that proceedings in Slovenia continue, with no indication of reconciliation between the parties. Meanwhile, TMZ Sports reported that Goltes stated she wanted to resolve the issue amicably for their children’s benefit, while Dončić’s legal team maintains that Slovenian courts have jurisdiction.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple sources without overtly favoring either side. It includes perspectives from both Goltes and her legal team, as well as Dončić’s legal representatives, without taking a clear ideological stance. While the legal dispute involves high-profile individuals,
Why factuality (65): The article continues to rely on TMZ and reports on the legal proceedings, including the mother’s withdrawal of the alimony claim. It adds some context about the ongoing legal battles in Slovenia, which is consistent with the primary source. However, it does not verify the exact figures or the full
Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat dramatic, emphasizing the complexity of the legal situation while possibly downplaying the personal aspects of the family life.
Anamaria Goltes did not withdraw her claim for maintenance in the interests of the children, that is the real reasonAnamaria Goltes, ex-fiancee of basketball player Luka Dončić, withdrew her request for child support determination in California, claiming it was not due to concern for children's well-being but rather because she believed the case had little chance of success. The court in Los Angeles rejected her request as it lacked Luka Dončić's signature on the documents. Reports indicate that Goltes and her lawyers withdrew the claim, citing an assessment that the California court would likely dismiss it anyway. Luka Dončić had previously expressed concerns about the potential high amount of child support and suggested resolving the dispute in Slovenia instead. His legal team had advocated for this approach, while Goltes initiated the process in America.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both parties' perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the legal actions taken by both Goltes and Dončić, including their respective legal teams' arguments and the court's decision. While there is some emphasis on the financial implications and strategic考量 (
Why factuality (65): The article discusses the withdrawal of the child support claim and the potential reasons, citing TMZ and other sources. While it aligns with the primary source on the main events, it introduces speculation about the motives behind the withdrawal, which are not directly confirmed by the primary sour
Why objectivity (50): The tone is somewhat biased, suggesting that the withdrawal was motivated by strategic considerations rather than genuine intent to resolve the matter amicably. This could be seen as favoring one interpretation over another.
Anamaria Goltes withdraws her claim for maintenance in favour of the childrenAnamaria Goltes, former fiancée of basketball player Luka Dončić, has withdrawn her request for child support determination that she previously filed in Los Angeles. In official documents obtained by TMZ, Goltes stated she is withdrawing the claim to resolve the matter amicably and in the best interest of her children. Luka Dončić had reportedly suggested rejecting her claim due to procedural errors and legal inadequacies, advising her to review a map. The basketball star, who previously wanted Goltes and their two daughters to move to California, cited the children’s residence in Slovenia as a reason. The case will now be decided by a Slovenian court, where Dončić filed the request in February. Meanwhile, he is said to have covered all expenses for their two-year-old daughter Gabriel and eight-month-old Olivia throughout this time.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation between Anamaria Goltes and Luka Dončić in a neutral manner, focusing on the legal actions taken and the reasons provided by both parties. There is no evident bias in the language used or the framing of the information. The content does not favor either side but is
Why factuality (65): The article mentions Anamaria Goltes withdrawing a child support claim and references TMZ reporting. While these points are mentioned in the primary source, the article adds additional context not directly supported by the primary source, such as the specific amounts involved. Some details may be in
Why objectivity (50): The tone remains somewhat objective, focusing on the legal process and the actions taken by both parties. However, there is a slight leaning towards portraying Goltes as acting in the best interest of the children, which could be seen as subtly biased.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 5519 days ago Dončić's change of heart on child support: Anamaria surprises with a new moveLuka Dončić in Anamaria Goltes sta zaznamovala preobrat v svojem odnosu, ko je Anamaria opustila svojo tožbo glede preživnine, ki jo so njeni odvetniki sprožili na ameriških sodiščih. Po poročanju TMZ-a je Anamaria v sodnem dokumentu izrazila željo po rešitvi te zadeve na prijateljski način in s skupnim dogovorom, kar bi bilo v interesu njunih otrok. Dončić je želel, da sodišče razveljaví preživninno sodiščno postopek, ki je bil sprožen v Kaliforniji, ker njegove hčerke živita v Sloveniji. Njegova odvetnica Laura Wasser je na sodišču zatrdila, da je Dončić skušal prepričati svojo zaročenko, da se s hčerkami preseli v Kalifornijo, kjer ima pogodbo z Los Angeles Lakers, a je Goltes to zavrnila. Par je bil skupaj približno deset let, medtem ko se je med njima rodila dva sina.
Bias read (Center): Čeprav je tematika preživnine zelo kontroverzna, artikel ne predstavlja nobene stranske podobe. Poudarek je na spremembah v odnosu in posredni ugovori o sodnih postopkih, brez izražanja politične podpore ali kritike. Sodni dokumenti in izjave odvetnikov so predstavljeni objektivno, brez izpostavljan
Why factuality (60): This article discusses the financial demands from Goltes and quotes TMZ sources, but it doesn't reference the primary source where Dončić confirmed the divorce. It includes details about the amount requested and the potential reduction in visitation rights, which may be speculative based on unverifi
Why objectivity (55): The tone suggests a narrative around the financial dispute, focusing more on the monetary aspects and less on the personal relationship. There is a slight bias toward presenting Goltes' demands as significant, though it remains relatively neutral.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 5018 days ago Luka Doncic is smiling up to his ears!The article discusses legal proceedings involving Luka Dončić and his ex-fiancée Anamaria Goltes regarding child support. Goltes has requested the California court to dismiss the case, aiming to resolve the matter amicably in the best interest of their children. According to information from Delo, Goltes and her lawyers believe the California court lacks jurisdiction and may dismiss the case, leading them to seek an out-of-court resolution rather than pursuing a settlement with Dončić. Dončić’s legal team maintains that the Slovenian court has jurisdiction over the matter. Meanwhile, social media has shared new photos of Dončić with fellow basketball players Luka Rupnik and Jaka Blažič, suggesting he is spending time in Slovenia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the legal dispute without overtly favoring either party. It reports on Goltes' request to dismiss the case and her legal team's reasoning, while also including Dončić's legal team's stance. The tone remains neutral, focusing on factual reporting rather than takinga
Why factuality (60): This article again relies on TMZ and reports on the mother’s withdrawal of the alimony claim. It includes additional details about the legal arguments and the father’s stance, but none of these are explicitly confirmed by the primary source. The focus on the legal process and the father’s response i
Why objectivity (50): The tone is somewhat sensational, focusing on the drama and potential conflict, which may influence the reader’s perception of the situation as more contentious than it is.
Anamaria Goltes withdrew the maintenance claim against Luke DončićAnamaria Goltes, former fiancée of basketball player Luka Dončić, has withdrawn her request for alimony from him. The decision comes after she decided to seek a mutual agreement regarding custody and financial support for their two daughters, Gabriela and Olivia, rather than allowing a California court to decide. Initially, Goltes had filed for alimony in Los Angeles, but now she aims to resolve the matter amicably. However, the court reportedly rejected her withdrawal request due to missing signatures from her ex-partner. Meanwhile, Dončić had previously opposed the involvement of a California court in the case, arguing that the children primarily reside in Slovenia while he spends most of his time in the U.S. due to his career. The legal dispute now appears to hinge on the custody arrangement rather than financial matters, with Dončić expressing a desire for shared custody to be more involved in his children’s lives.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both parties' perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It reports on legal actions and personal decisions without using biased language or emphasizing one viewpoint over another. The focus is on the legal process and the individuals’ stated intentions, maintaining a较为中
Why factuality (60): The article speculates on the reasons behind the mother’s withdrawal of the alimony claim, citing sources that suggest it was due to the inappropriateness of the California court. These claims are not directly confirmed by the primary source, which makes the factual basis weaker.
Why objectivity (50): The article leans into the idea that the mother’s actions were strategic, implying a deeper motive, which could be seen as biased towards the father’s position.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 4516 days agoAnamaria Goltes, ex-partnerica in mati otrok slovenskega košarkarskega zvezdnika Luka Dončića, je predstavljala nov sodni zahtevek za preživnino v Sloveniji. Po poročanju ameriškega portala TMZ Sports naj bi od Dončića zahtevala skupno 50 milijonov dolarjev (okoli 43,41 milijona evrov), od tega 40 milijonov dolarjev zase in 10 milijonov dolarjev za njune hčerke. Njena predhodna zahtevka za preživnino za otroka je bila umaknjena, kar je Dončić opisal kot poskus rešitve spora sporazumno. Sodišče v Kaliforniji bi zahtevke zavrglo, ker so otroci živeli v Sloveniji. Dončić je dejal, da je v Sloveniji sprožil postopek glede skrbništva in preživnine, kar je morda vplivalo na odločitev Goltesove.
Bias read (Center): Tematiko predstavlja sportski spore med igralcem in njegovo ex-partnerico, kar je apolitično. Čeprav so vključeni sodni postopki, se ne dotikajo političnih tem, zato je politična obremenitev nižja. Vsebina ne prikazuje nobene stranske obremenitve, zato je lekanje CENTER.
Why factuality (60): The article reports on the legal dispute, mentioning the $40 million demand and the use of child access as leverage. While this aligns with the general narrative from the primary source, the specific figure of $40 million isn't directly confirmed by the primary source. The article also includes quot
Why objectivity (45): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, though it emphasizes the financial aspect of the dispute and portrays Goltes as seeking compensation, which might imply a subtle bias. It doesn’t clearly balance the perspective of Dončić.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 55Objective 5019 days agoAnamaria Goltes, former fiancée of NBA star Luka Dončić, has withdrawn her legal claim for child support in the United States, opting instead for a mutual agreement. The documents obtained by TMZ Sports indicate that Goltes withdrew her request, aiming to resolve the matter amicably for the benefit of their two children, Gabriela and Olivia. Dončić had previously requested the court in California to dismiss Goltes' claim, arguing that the children reside in Slovenia and that he had attempted to relocate them to California but was unsuccessful. The couple, who have been together since high school and married in 2023, announced their separation in March 2024, citing Dončić's commitment to providing the best life for his daughters.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal dispute between Luka Dončić and Anamaria Goltes, focusing on the withdrawal of the lawsuit and the couple's personal circumstances. It does not take a clear ideological stance, instead presenting both parties' positions and the legal implications.
Why factuality (55): The article focuses on speculation about where Dončić spends his summer, without referencing the primary source. It uses phrases like 'razkrito' and 'precej bolj napete razsežnosti,' which suggest heightened tension without direct evidence. This makes the factual content less reliable.
Why objectivity (50): The tone is more sensational, focusing on the drama and speculation surrounding the couple’s separation. It lacks neutrality and seems to amplify the emotional stakes of the situation.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 3013 days ago Luka Dončić is not interested, she kisses him!The article discusses rumors surrounding the personal life of Slovenian basketball player Luka Dončić, particularly his potential romantic relationships. Initially, there were speculations about the end of his long-term relationship with Anamaria Goltes after both removed shared posts from Instagram. These rumors were later linked to Serbian singer Breskvica and then to American actress Madelyn Cline. However, these claims proved false, as Cline was seen in Los Angeles with real estate agent Michael Reyes, who was identified as her companion. The article highlights the spread of gossip through social media platforms like X and mentions Cline's career, including her roles in popular TV series and films.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on sports-related content regarding a professional athlete's personal life, which falls under the SPORTS category. It does not engage with politically charged topics such as government policies, elections, or public opinion on societal issues. The framing remains neutral, relying
Why factuality (50): The article contains multiple false claims, including incorrect details about the breakup timeline, false allegations of affairs with Madelyn Cline, and fabricated narratives about the couple’s separation. It also incorrectly attributes statements to Dončić that were never made. These inaccuracies c
Why objectivity (30): The tone is highly subjective and emotionally charged, presenting speculative and unverified claims as if they are facts. The article uses sensational language and frames the situation in a way that suggests bias against Dončić, while ignoring the official confirmation from ESPN.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 6018 days agoAnamaria Goltes, former fiancée of NBA star Luka Dončić, has officially withdrawn her request for child support for their two daughters at a court in Los Angeles. She stated that she is doing so to resolve the matter amicably through mutual agreement, which she believes is in the best interest of the children. The request was made without prejudice, meaning it could be refiled if an agreement is not reached. The court has not yet finalized approval due to the absence of Dončić’s signature. The couple was together for nearly a decade before separating in March 2026, with Dončić citing his inability to convince Goltes to live with him in the U.S. during the season as the main reason. Goltes had filed the request in March 2026, but Dončić’s lawyers argued that California does not have jurisdiction since the children have been living in Slovenia since May 2025, and one daughter was never there. Dončić had already submitted a temporary custody order in February 2026 in Slovenia. The withdrawal of the California lawsuit suggests that the dispute over child support and visitation rights will likely be resolved in Slovenia or directly between the parties. Dončić is currently spending his '
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, focusing on legal actions and statements from both parties without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both Goltes and Dončić's representatives, providing balanced information.
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (60): The tone remains largely neutral, focusing on the legal and familial aspects without overtly taking sides. It presents the situation based on available information without injecting strong emotional language.
Slovenia
