LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 758 days agoThe California court has officially dismissed Anamarie Goltes' claim for child support against Slovenian basketball player Luka Dončić. The legal process in California has concluded, but the broader dispute between Goltes and Dončić remains unresolved. Dončić's side argued that California was not the appropriate jurisdiction since neither he, Goltes, nor their daughters reside in the state, and the children live in Slovenia where family proceedings have already been initiated. While Goltes initially requested to withdraw her petition in August, seeking a friendly resolution in the best interest of the children, the court formally closed the case on Friday. However, Goltes has reportedly filed a new lawsuit in Slovenia, demanding $50 million in compensation, including $40 million for herself, and requesting changes to the agreement regarding Dončić's time with his children, reducing it from two days per week to one day. Dončić has consistently maintained that issues related to child support and custody should be resolved in Slovenia, where his daughters reside.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal dispute between Luka Dončić and Anamarie Goltes in a neutral manner, focusing on the legal procedures and arguments made by both parties without showing clear favoritism or biased language. It provides information from both sides and mentions the potential continuation
Why factuality (90): This article accurately reflects the TMZ report, confirming the rejection of Anamaria's alimony claim in California and the shift to Slovenia. It clearly states the $50 million demand and the potential split between personal and child-related funds. Legal procedures and positions are presented factu
Why objectivity (75): While the article remains largely neutral, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'pravna zmaga' (legal victory) and emphasizes Luka's success, which could be interpreted as slightly favorable to him. However, it avoids overt bias and presents both sides fairly.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 708 days agoThe Kalifornian court has officially rejected Anamarie Goltes' request for alimony, which was reportedly between $200,000 and $600,000 per month. The legal dispute between Luka Dončić and his former partner Anamarie Goltes, who is also the mother of their two children, has been ongoing. The court determined that the case was not under its jurisdiction because neither Goltes nor Dončić's daughters reside in California. Despite attempts by Goltes' legal team to withdraw the claim, it was denied due to the lack of Dončić's signature. The case was dismissed without the possibility of a new process. However, this does not mean Dončić has won the battle over alimony, as the legal fight will now move to Slovenian courts. According to Spanish magazine Marca, the calculation of alimony considers factors such as each parent's income, time spent with the children, child care costs, health expenses, and the parents' standard of living. Meanwhile, Goltes is reported to be open to settlement but demands $50 million in compensation from Dončić, including $40 million for herself and $10 million for the children, along with reducing the time he spends with them from two days to one day per week.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the legal proceedings involving Luka Dončić and Anamarie Goltes, detailing both parties' arguments and the court's decision without apparent bias toward either side. There is no evident slant in the language used or the information presented.
Why factuality (85): The article aligns closely with the TMZ primary source document, reporting that Anamaria Goltes' claim for alimony was rejected by California courts due to lack of jurisdiction. It mentions the move to Slovenia and the $50 million demand, though it doesn't explicitly reference the $40 million for he
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat sensational, using phrases like 'noro razkritje!' and emphasizing the legal battle in a way that could be seen as biased toward Luka's position. While it reports facts neutrally, the emphasis on Luka's victory might subtly favor his perspective.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 658 days ago Doncic's attorney has filed charges against Goltes's attorney.Luka Dončić, a Slovenian basketball player, has won his first legal battle against his former fiancée Anamaria Goltes regarding alimony. The California court approved her request to end the process of determining alimony, which she had filed against Dončić. Dončić's lawyers had previously opposed the request, arguing that the California court was not competent to make such a decision since neither Goltes nor their children live in California. However, Goltes eventually withdrew her claim, likely due to the low chances of success. The legal battle will now continue in Slovenia, where Goltes is expected to demand $50 million in alimony from Dončić.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings between Luka Dončić and Anamaria Goltes in a balanced manner, focusing on the legal arguments and outcomes without showing clear favoritism toward either side. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the procedural aspects of the case rather than taking a
Why factuality (80): The article confirms the rejection of the alimony claim in California and the move to Slovenia, matching TMZ's report. It mentions the $50 million demand and the change in custody terms, though it lacks specific details from TMZ about the $40 million vs. $10 million breakdown. Some sentences are inc
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans towards supporting Luka's position, especially when mentioning his 'pravna zmago' and the rejection of the claim. There is a slight editorializing tone in phrasing like 'preobrat pri Dončiću,' suggesting a narrative rather than pure reporting.
Luka in the midst of a legal battle with Anamario charmed by a photo: look who's keeping him company during training (PHOTO)The article discusses Slovenian basketball star Luka Dončić, highlighting his focus on family life and physical preparation despite ongoing legal disputes with his former fiancée Ana Marija Goltes. It features a photo shared by Dončić on social media showing him exercising with his daughter, emphasizing his dedication to both parenting and sports. The piece notes his readiness for the new NBA season and mentions his strong motivation and physical condition.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of Luka Dončić's personal and professional life without overtly favoring any political stance. It focuses on his family and career achievements rather than taking a clear ideological position.
Why factuality (70): The article accurately reflects the ongoing legal battle between Luka Dončić and Anamaria Goltes, mentioning the financial demands and custody issues. It references the primary source document's confirmation of the breakup and includes details about the children and their time with him. However, it
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a more neutral tone compared to the first, focusing on both the personal and professional aspects of Dončić's life. It highlights his dedication to his children and training, which aligns with the primary source's emphasis on family. However, it still frames the situation somew
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 5517 days agoAnamaria Goltes, the ex-fiancée of NBA player Luka Dončić, has reportedly withdrawn a child support lawsuit previously filed in Los Angeles after determining that the California court lacks jurisdiction over custody matters. According to sources cited by Delo, Goltes is now seeking a one-time payment of $40 million from Dončić, separate from any child support claims. This demand appears to be based on leveraging contact with their two daughters, despite the fact that Dončić continues to prioritize his family. The couple recently ended their relationship, and while Goltes initially appeared to seek reconciliation, sources indicate ongoing tension between the pair. Meanwhile, Dončić has focused on spending time with his daughters in Slovenia and preparing for the upcoming NBA season.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Goltes' financial demands and Dončić's continued commitment to his children, without overtly favoring either side. It relies on unnamed sources and avoids explicit commentary or loaded language, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (70): The article accurately reports on Anamaria Goltes withdrawing her child support claim and references the legal process. It aligns with the primary source regarding the timing and nature of the legal action. The mention of the children's welfare is consistent with the primary source's emphasis on Don
Why objectivity (55): The tone is generally neutral, focusing on the legal process and the implications for the children. However, it occasionally implies that Goltes is using the children as leverage, which could be interpreted as slightly biased.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 6017 days agoAnamaria Goltes has reportedly filed a new legal claim in Slovenia seeking alimony worth $50 million from her former husband, basketball player Luka Dončić. According to the American tabloid TMZ, which cited its sources, Goltes is requesting $40 million for herself and $10 million for their two daughters. She also allegedly wants to reduce the number of days the children spend with Dončić, currently at least two days per week, to just one day per week. Earlier this week, TMZ reported that Goltes had withdrawn a similar alimony request she previously filed in Los Angeles, California, stating she wished to resolve the matter amicably for the benefit of the children. Dončić had previously asked the court in Los Angeles to dismiss the alimony claim, arguing it was filed in California despite the children living in Slovenia. He claimed he had tried for months to convince Goltes to move to California with the children but was refused, leading to the end of their marriage. The couple, who were married since 2016 and got engaged in 2023, have two young children.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal dispute between a celebrity couple involving financial claims and custody arrangements. While the individuals involved are notable figures, the content focuses on personal matters rather than political issues, policies, or governmental actions. The framing appears to持平
Why factuality (65): This article accurately reports the withdrawal of the lawsuit in California and references the move to Slovenia, aligning with the primary source. It also mentions the legal arguments made by Dončić’s team regarding jurisdiction and the children’s residency. However, it still relies on secondary sou
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a balanced approach, reporting both sides of the legal dispute without overtly favoring either party. It presents the situation objectively while acknowledging the ongoing legal process.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 5516 days ago The Americans reveal that this is the amount that Goltesova is now demanding from Luke.The article reports on a legal dispute between former fiancée of NBA star Luka Dončić, Anamaria Goltes, and Dončić himself regarding child custody and financial support. According to American media outlets like TMZ and the New York Post, Goltes has demanded $50 million in alimony and requested a reduction in the time Dončić spends with their two daughters. The amount would cover $40 million as a lump sum for Goltes and $10 million for the children’s living expenses. Goltes reportedly threatened to withdraw her case if Dončić refuses to pay, but her request was allegedly denied due to lack of his signature. The legal battle, which began in March, could resume on August 14th.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally by citing multiple American media sources such as TMZ and the New York Post, without overtly favoring either side. It reports both parties' positions and the potential implications without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue involves high-淨
Why factuality (65): Article cites TMZ as a source claiming that Anamaria Goltes has requested $50 million in alimony from Luka Dončić, but this information is not confirmed by the primary source document. The primary source only mentions the divorce and the children, not financial demands. There is also no mention of l
Why objectivity (55): The article presents the financial demand as a significant point, suggesting a conflict between the parties. It uses emotionally charged language like 'drami' and implies tension, which may bias the reader towards viewing the situation as adversarial rather than neutral.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 6515 days ago Anamaria Goltes allegedly demanded from Luke Doncic several million euros for herself and some for her daughtersAnamaria Goltes, ex-fiancee of basketball star Luka Dončić, is reportedly seeking substantial financial support from him, according to information obtained by the American website TMZ. The claims suggest she is requesting around 34 million euros for herself and approximately 8 million euros for her daughters. The allegations emerged after TMZ reported that Goltes had initially submitted the claim in Slovenia, and unnamed sources close to both parties allegedly indicated that Goltes wished to reduce the number of days her children spend with their father. This comes following TMZ's earlier report that Goltes had withdrawn her request after the determination of alimony in the United States.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual reports from multiple sources (TMZ and 24ur.com) regarding a personal financial dispute between Anamaria Goltes and Luka Dončić. While the issue involves high-profile individuals and potential legal implications, the framing remains neutral, relying on external reporting
Why factuality (60): This article provides a more personal perspective, mentioning the photograph shared by Dončić and his focus on his children. It aligns with the primary source in terms of the divorce confirmation and the emphasis on family. However, it does not delve into the legal disputes or financial claims.
Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a positive and emotionally supportive tone, focusing on the personal life and family aspects. It avoids the contentious legal and financial elements, thus maintaining a higher level of objectivity.
DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 60Objective 5517 days agoAnamaria Goltes, former girlfriend and mother of basketball star Luka Dončić, is reportedly seeking around €43.9 million in a settlement after their breakup, according to American media outlet TMZ. The report states that Goltes is requesting approximately €35.1 million for herself and an additional €8.8 million for her two daughters. She also wants to limit Dončić’s visitation rights, reducing his time with the children from at least two days per week to just one day. TMZ cites unnamed sources, but neither Dončić nor Goltes has confirmed these claims. The couple had been together for about ten years before breaking off their engagement early this year. They have two young daughters, Gabriela and Olivia. Dončić recently moved to Slovenia to be closer to his children while legal proceedings regarding custody continue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on personal financial and custody disputes between a high-profile individual and his ex-partner, which does not inherently carry strong political implications. However, the framing emphasizes the large financial demands and potential legal battles over child custody, which could,
Why factuality (60): The article cites TMZ and provides figures about the financial claim, but again does not reference the primary source confirming the divorce. It includes specific numbers and potential changes in visitation rights, which could be speculative. The information is presented through secondary sources.
Why objectivity (55): There is a clear emphasis on the financial aspects of the case, suggesting a possible bias towards the legal battle. While it remains somewhat neutral, the focus on money and potential custody issues gives it a slightly subjective tone.
CekinIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 5016 days agoThe article discusses unconfirmed reports that Anamaria Goltes, the former partner of NBA player Luka Dončić, allegedly requested $50 million (approximately €43.3 million) in a financial settlement after their separation. This includes $40 million (€34.7 million) for herself and $10 million (€8.7 million) for her two daughters. However, these figures are based on unofficial information and have not been confirmed by any publicly available legal documents. Goltes filed a request in California in March 2026 to determine child support and attorney fees but later withdrew the request, aiming to resolve the matter amicably for the benefit of her children. The article notes that since Dončić and Goltes were not married, the alleged $40 million claim cannot be classified as spousal support. Instead, it could relate to assets accumulated during their cohabitation, compensation, financial security post-separation, or a comprehensive settlement. The $10 million for the children would need separate consideration. The article highlights that while the total amount appears large, it might be distributed over many years rather than being a lump sum.
Bias read (Center): The article presents unconfirmed claims without taking a clear stance, providing context about the nature of the relationship between Goltes and Dončić and explaining why the financial claims do not fall under traditional spousal support. It does not favor one side over the other and emphasizes thel
Why factuality (60): The article discusses the $50 million claim and compares it to other celebrity divorces, but many of the details are speculative. It references TMZ and other media, but the specific figures and motivations are not confirmed by the primary source. The comparison to other cases is not directly support
Why objectivity (50): The tone is somewhat biased, emphasizing the financial aspect and suggesting that the claim is unusually high. It doesn’t provide a balanced view of the situation or the motivations of either party.
Info360IndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 5016 days agoAnamaria Goltes, bivša zaročenka NBA zvezdnika Lukas Dončića, zahteva pred sodiščem 50 milijonov dolarjev od Dončića. Ameriški mediji, kot je TMZ, navdajajo, da bi Goltes zahtevala 40 milijonov zase in 10 milijonov za hčerke. Poudarjajo, da je zahtevan znesek za otroke razumljiv, vendar pa je zahtevan znesek zase nejasen. Vprašanja se pojavljajo tudi glede na to, kako bo vse praktično izvedljivo, ker se Goltes s hčerkama preselila v Slovenijo, medtem ko Dončić živi čez lužo. Poleg finančnih zahtevk se Goltes tudi poskuša znižati število dni, ki jih Dončić lahko preživi s hčerkama na teden. Dončić je letos odrekel nastope za slovensko izbrano vrsto, medtem ko bo v avgustu gostil tudi celotno moštvo ekipa Los Angeles Lakers v Sloveniji.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation through the lens of a high-profile personal dispute involving a Slovenian national and an NBA star, which has implications for public figures and their legal matters. While the focus is on personal finances and family law, the narrative emphasizes the potential legal
Why factuality (60): This article repeats the claim about the $50 million alimony request without verification against the primary source. It adds details about the children living in Slovenia and the NBA player’s decision to skip the national team, which aligns with the primary source but does not confirm the alimony c
Why objectivity (50): The tone leans toward dramatizing the situation, using phrases like 'drami med Luko Dončićem in Anamario Goltes ni videti konca.' This suggests an emotional narrative rather than a balanced report.
Anamaria was supposed to claim 34 million and less days when the daughters and DoncicAnamaria Goltes, former partner of basketball player Luka Dončić, is reportedly seeking $50 million (approximately €43.3 million) in a new legal request, including $40 million (€34 million) for herself and $10 million (€8 million) for their two daughters, Gabriela and Olivia. According to unnamed sources close to the couple, she has also requested to reduce the number of days the children spend with Dončić, from at least two days per week to just one day per week. This comes after Anamaria withdrew her request for child support determination in the U.S., aiming to resolve the dispute amicably for the benefit of the children. Earlier reports indicated that Dončić had suggested rejecting her claim due to procedural irregularities and legal inadequacies, citing the children’s residence in Slovenia as a reason.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information based on third-party sources (TMZ and unnamed individuals close to the situation) without overtly favoring either party. It does not include direct quotes or explicit endorsements from either Anamaria or Luka Dončić, maintaining a balanced tone by reporting claims as
Why factuality (60): The article reports on the $50 million claim and the proposed reduction in visitation rights, but much of the content is based on unverified sources like TMZ. It includes details not directly confirmed by the primary source, such as the specific amounts and the proposed changes in visitation.
Why objectivity (45): The tone is somewhat biased, focusing on the financial and logistical aspects of the dispute while downplaying the personal elements. It suggests that Goltes is acting in a self-serving manner, which could be seen as a subtle bias.
According to foreign media reports, Anamaria Goltes is allegedly demanding $50 million from Luke Doncic.Anamaria Goltes, ex-fiancee of Slovenian basketball player Luka Dončić, has reportedly filed a new legal claim in Slovenia seeking $50 million (approximately €43 million), with $40 million intended for herself and $10 million for their two daughters. The claim follows her withdrawal of a previous request for child support in California, and she now seeks to change custody arrangements. Dončić argues that Slovenian courts should handle the matter since his children reside in Slovenia, while Goltes appears to want more time with them. The case highlights ongoing legal disputes over financial support and parental involvement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both parties' perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the legal dispute between Dončić and Goltes, including their differing positions on custody and financial matters, but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains balanced, focusing
Why factuality (60): The article reports on legal disputes involving Anamaria Goltes and Luka Dončić, referencing a claim of $50 million in financial demands. While some details align with the primary source (such as the ongoing legal battle), the specific figures and motivations are not confirmed by the primary source.
Why objectivity (40): The article presents the legal conflict in a somewhat neutral manner, though it leans toward emphasizing the financial aspect over the personal aspects of the relationship. It doesn't clearly present both sides' perspectives equally, potentially favoring one party more than the other.
Anamaria Goltes has revealed the astronomical sum that she wants from Luke Doncic!The article reports on escalating tensions between Slovenian basketball star Luka Dončić and his former fiancée Anamaria Goltes regarding financial disputes. Recent developments reveal that Goltes is demanding a one-time payment of $40 million, separate from child support for their two daughters. This amount has been described as absurd by those close to Dončić, who emphasize his consistent financial responsibility for his children. The situation remains unresolved, with Goltes reportedly using interactions with the daughters as leverage and seeking new legal protection outside Slovenia.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a personal and legal dispute between individuals, which does not involve political figures, policies, or ideologies. The framing remains neutral, presenting both parties' perspectives without overt ideological slant.
Why factuality (55): The article continues to report on the financial claims and legal battles, relying on secondary sources such as TMZ and Delo. It mentions the financial demands and the potential use of visitation rights as leverage, but these are not verified by the primary source document.
Why objectivity (50): The tone is somewhat biased, focusing on the financial aspects and implying that the demands are unreasonable. It frames the situation in a way that emphasizes the conflict rather than providing a balanced view.
Doncic in the middle of a courtroom saga with his ex-fiancée spending time with his daughtersLuka Dončić has been spending his summer with his two daughters, creating memorable moments shared online, including photos of his youngest daughter Gabriela at a gym session and a visit to Ljubljana Zoo where he entertained her with a large piñata. However, Dončić is currently involved in a legal dispute with his former fiancée, Anamaria Goltes, over custody and financial arrangements for their children. According to reports, Goltes has filed a new request in Slovenia seeking €34 million from Dončić and €8 million for their daughter, while also requesting a reduction in the time he spends with the children, from two days per week to just one day. The case is expected to be decided by a Slovenian court, which already received the request in February. Meanwhile, Dončić reportedly continues to cover all expenses for their eight-month-old daughter Olivia and her older sister.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the legal dispute between Luka Dončić and his former fiancée regarding child custody and financial support. It presents both parties' actions without overtly favoring one side, using neutral language and citing external reports (TMZ) without apparent bias.
Why factuality (55): The article reports on a legal dispute between Luka Dončić and his ex-fiancée Anamaria Goltes, including financial demands and custody issues. While these details are not explicitly confirmed by the primary source document, they align with the general context of the breakup. However, the article int
Why objectivity (45): The tone of the article leans towards sensationalism, focusing on the drama and financial aspects of the situation. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'astronomical financial demands' and emphasizes the personal life of Dončić over his professional achievements, showing a lack of balance.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 55Objective 4516 days agoAnamaria Goltes, former fiancée of basketball player Luka Dončić, has claimed she is entitled to $40 million from their relationship, with an additional $10 million intended for the care of their two daughters. Reports suggest she wants to limit Dončić’s contact with the children to two days per week, while he currently spends at least two days a week with them. The split occurred after ten years together, including an engagement, but they eventually separated. Dončić has argued that California courts lack jurisdiction over the case since the children reside in Slovenia and has initiated proceedings in Slovenia regarding custody.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both parties' positions without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the legal dispute between Goltes and Dončić, including his argument about jurisdiction and her claims regarding child custody. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the story, which keeps它
Why factuality (55): The article discusses the $50 million claim and the legal process, but much of the content is based on unconfirmed rumors and speculation. It references TMZ and other media outlets, but the specific figures and details are not independently verified by the primary source.
Why objectivity (45): The tone is somewhat sensationalized, focusing on the high stakes of the financial claim and implying that the legal process is more complex than it appears. It lacks a balanced view of both parties’ positions.
Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 4518 days agoThe article reveals that Luka Dončić, the Serbian basketball player, is spending his summer vacation with his new partner, Ana Knežević, in Montenegro. The piece focuses on the couple's activities and their location during the off-season, highlighting their time together after their recent divorce. It provides details about their whereabouts and social interactions, emphasizing their current relationship status. The report does not include any political commentary or discussion of public policy, focusing solely on the personal life of a high-profile athlete.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses the personal life of a sports figure and does not involve any politically charged topics such as government policies, elections, or public debates. As such, it is considered apolitical and therefore leans toward the center.
Why factuality (50): This article contains highly speculative claims about the financial demand, including an astronomical figure of 40 million dollars. These figures are not supported by the primary source and appear to be taken from secondary media outlets. The article also implies internal conflicts within the legal
Why objectivity (45): The article has a strong emotional tone, using words like 'osupljivih' and 'astronomski znesek' to emphasize the magnitude of the financial claim. It appears to take a biased stance in highlighting the severity of the situation.
Slovenia
