Measurement office approves start of section speed measurement on three sectionsThe Office for Metrology has approved the start of section-based speed measurement on three out of four planned road segments after several months of delay. The approval covers sections of highways between Logatec–Vrhnika towards Ljubljana, Ljubljana Brod–Vodice towards Kranj, and Grosuplje–Ivančna Gorica towards Novo mesto. These measurements will now be used for traffic enforcement based on the Road Traffic Act. However, the segment between Podmilj–Ločica is still undergoing verification due to additional modifications requested by the applicant. The delay was caused by the failure of the contractor, Intermatic, to install the system by the deadline, leading to potential fines under the contract.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of the approval process for speed monitoring systems without overtly favoring any political side. It includes both the progress made and the delays encountered, citing relevant entities like the Office for Metrology, Dars, and the contractor Intermatic. There's
Why factuality (85): This article closely follows the primary source document, providing accurate information about the approval of section-based speed measurement on three sections and the delay in the process. It includes specific details like the names of the sections and the status of the fourth section, matching th
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting facts without taking sides or expressing personal opinions. It provides balanced reporting on the progress and challenges faced during the implementation.
Green light for section speed measurementThe Slovenian Road Measurement Office has completed the first verification of three out of four sections equipped with iCar5 speed measuring devices. The verified sections include Logatec–Vrhnika towards Ljubljana, Ljubljana Brod–Voknice towards Kranj, and Grosuplje–Ivančna Gorica towards Nova Gorica. This marks a green light for using measurement results in speeding violation proceedings. However, the system implementation faced delays due to the lack of certification for the iCar5 device by the measurement authority. Dars, the company responsible for setting up the system, had previously threatened financial penalties for delays, but the project remains unfinished. The system aims to calculate average speeds across entire monitored sections rather than single points, making lane changes less effective. Officials note that speed limits must remain consistent during measurements.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the status of speed measurement technology deployment without overtly favoring any political group. It reports on bureaucratic processes, technical challenges, and legal implications without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue involves a爭
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reflects the primary source document regarding the approval of section-based speed measurement on three sections and the ongoing process for the fourth. It also mentions the delays and financial implications, which are consistent with the original text.
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, discussing the situation without favoring any particular party. The article presents the information objectively, including both the progress made and the challenges encountered.
AMZS has upgraded an app to help you with AC sectional speed measurementOn September 6, 2026, Slovenia's Free Mobility Authority (AMZS) announced a major update to its free app, which now allows drivers to monitor their average speed during section-based speed measurements. The update was released just as the Slovenian State Metrology Office (Urad RS za meroslovje) approved the start of using section radar systems on three motorway sections. The new feature uses GPS to alert users upon entering monitored zones, continuously calculates and displays average speed, and provides progress tracking through the section. The system is currently active on three sections: A1 between Logatec and Vrhnika (towards Ljubljana), A2 between Ljubljana Brod and Vodice (toward Kranj), and A2 between Grosuplje and Ivančna Gorica (toward Novo Mesto). A fourth section, Podmilj–Ločica (toward Maribor), is pending final technical verification. The app remains available on both Google Play and Apple App Store, offering additional features like alerts for stationary radars, traffic jams, and emergency calls.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a technological upgrade to a mobile application related to road safety measures. While the introduction of section-based speed monitoring involves governmental regulation and infrastructure development, the tone and framing remain neutral, focusing on a
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the launch of the new AMZS app feature related to section-based speed measurement, aligning with the primary source document. It mentions the three approved sections and the availability of the app on both Android and iOS, which matches the original text. However, it s
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on the functionality and benefits of the new app feature. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though there is a slight emphasis on the practical benefits for drivers.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 659/8/2026Slovenia has introduced section-based speed measurement on four sections of its motorways, similar to systems already implemented in Italy and Austria. According to data from Italy, where the system was introduced earlier, there was a 50% reduction in fatal accidents within the first year and a 15% decrease in average speeds. The system, managed by Dars, is currently limited to these four sections and does not plan to expand it further at this time. Officials emphasized that international experience suggests such measures effectively reduce average speeds and improve road safety.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the implementation of section-based speed measurement in Slovenia, referencing successful outcomes in Italy and Austria. It avoids taking a clear ideological stance, focusing on data and expert statements rather than promoting a specific political view.
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the implementation of section-based speed measurement in Slovenia, referencing data from Italy where fatalities decreased by 50% and average speeds dropped by 15%. These statistics are presented as external evidence supporting the effectiveness of the system, though no direct l
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the benefits of section-based speed measurement with positive outcomes from Italy, suggesting it as an effective measure. However, it lacks balance by only highlighting positive results without addressing potential criticisms or limitations of such systems.
Slovenia
