ON
← Back to feed
Amol Rajan didn’t ruin the Today programme — he saved it
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Amol Rajan didn’t ruin the Today programme — he saved it

The article discusses Amol Rajan's departure from the BBC's 'Today' programme after nearly five years as a presenter. It acknowledges criticisms that the show became too casual and personality-driven under his leadership, comparing it unfavorably to the more formal style of past presenters like John Humphrys. However, the piece argues that Rajan's energetic and engaging approach revitalized the programme, making it more relatable and modern while maintaining its core journalistic integrity. The article highlights Rajan's influence in shifting the programme's identity toward a more personable format, despite some backlash, and suggests that his contributions ultimately strengthened the show.

Amol Rajan has concluded his tenure as host of BBC Radio 4's Today programme, marking the end of an era for the iconic news show. On his final day, Rajan played his last philosophical quote, delivered his final segment of jungle music, and bid farewell to the programme with a nod to the Only Fools and Horses theme tune. He is now transitioning into the creator economy, launching a new production company, a YouTube channel, and a community known as "The Amol Rajan Connection." Known for his energetic style, distinct south London accent, and signature gold chain, Rajan leaves behind a legacy that includes reshaping the tone and format of the Today programme. Since joining Today in 2021, Rajan has faced criticism for altering the programme’s traditional approach. Critics argue that the show has grown more casual, focusing excessively on pop culture, personal anecdotes, and the hosts' individual identities. Some lament the shift away from the more formal and interrogative style once associated with John Humphrys, who previously anchored the programme. Humphrys recently expressed frustration in The Guardian, noting the programme's perceived informality, including Rajan's tendency to emphasize grammatical articles in his broadcasts, such as stating "A bomb has exploded in THE palace of Westminster." Rajan’s departure has sparked reflection on the evolution of Today. His former colleague Mishal Husain, who left the BBC for Bloomberg, suggested that personality-driven journalism need not be overly dramatic or self-centered. While she did not explicitly name Rajan, her comments implied a contrast between the current iteration of Today and the one she helped shape during her 11 years as a presenter. Despite the criticisms, Rajan has undeniably influenced the programme's transformation. Under his leadership, Today has adopted a more relaxed and personable tone, incorporating elements of human interest and pop culture. Listeners are now more familiar with the hosts' personal lives, Rajan's passion for reggae and Shakespeare, and Emma Barnett’s fondness for tea, for instance. However, the programme remains more structured than typical podcasts, maintaining a balance between formality and accessibility. Rajan’s ability to adapt to evolving media landscapes has positioned him uniquely within British journalism. Prior to hosting Today, he served as the BBC’s media editor and had experience as editor-in-chief of The Independent and as a senior figure at its parent company, Evgeny Lebedev. His career spans television production, radio hosting, and in-depth interviews, providing him with a broad perspective on media changes. The rise of podcasting and social media has significantly altered the media environment. Traditional institutions like the BBC face challenges in retaining audiences skeptical of mainstream media, particularly among younger listeners. Meanwhile, commercial radio stations such as LBC and Times Radio have gained traction by offering bold, often polarizing viewpoints. In this shifting landscape, Rajan recognized the necessity for Today to evolve, embracing a more engaging and relatable format to remain relevant. As Rajan steps away from Today, the programme stands in a stronger position than when he arrived. His influence has ensured that the show continues to thrive amidst changing audience expectations and media dynamics. With his transition to independent content creation, Rajan aims to build upon the connections and platforms he developed during his time at the BBC, continuing to engage with audiences through innovative storytelling methods.

1 reports

iNews logoiNewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Amol Rajan didn’t ruin the Today programme — he saved it

The article discusses Amol Rajan's departure from the BBC's 'Today' programme after nearly five years as a presenter. It acknowledges criticisms that the show became too casual and personality-driven under his leadership, comparing it unfavorably to the more formal style of past presenters like John Humphrys. However, the piece argues that Rajan's energetic and engaging approach revitalized the programme, making it more relatable and modern while maintaining its core journalistic integrity. The article highlights Rajan's influence in shifting the programme's identity toward a more personable format, despite some backlash, and suggests that his contributions ultimately strengthened the show.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Amol Rajan's changes to the 'Today' programme as a positive evolution, emphasizing his role in modernizing the show and aligning it with contemporary audience expectations. While it acknowledges criticism from figures like John Humphrys and Mishal Husain, it presents these views (

Why factuality (85): The article presents a narrative that Amol Rajan's departure from the Today programme was a positive change, suggesting the programme is now 'stronger' than when he joined. While it accurately reports his exit and some criticisms of the programme under his tenure, it does not provide a balanced view

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'crashed his final pips' and 'self-proclaimed Reithian rascal,' which may influence reader perception. The framing leans towards portraying Rajan's departure as beneficial to the programme, potentially overlooking other viewpoints. The article al

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories