ON
← Back to feed
Amid Starlink row, Owaisi says he opposes Modi, but how can a ‘gora’ question India’s PM?
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 days ago

Amid Starlink row, Owaisi says he opposes Modi, but how can a ‘gora’ question India’s PM?

The controversy began after Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, criticized delays in granting Starlink, his satellite internet service, permission to operate commercially in India. AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi responded by criticizing the BJP government for allegedly being overly cautious about foreign influence, particularly highlighting Musk's comments about India's leadership. Owaisi emphasized that opposing Prime Minister Narendra Modi does not equate to supporting foreign interference in India's affairs. The issue has sparked broader political debate, with the opposition questioning the government's relationship with major corporations. The Indian government denied claims of discrimination, stating that its regulatory process for satellite communications is fair and non-discriminatory.

Reliance Industries Ltd. on Friday denied accusations by billionaire Elon Musk that it is blocking the launch of Starlink, his satellite internet service in India. The company said it has "never feared competition" and emphasized that the Indian market is open to all players under the rule of law. Reliance did not directly name Musk but responded to "recent remarks about Reliance and the Indian market." The company noted that the regulatory process applies equally to all applicants, regardless of nationality. It also mentioned that its own satellite services, offered through its telecommunications division Jio, are waiting for clearances similar to those required for Starlink. Starlink, operated by SpaceX, provides internet access via satellites in low-Earth orbit. If launched in India, it would face competition from Jio Space Technology, a joint venture under Reliance, and Eutelsat OneWeb, supported by Bharti Airtel Group. Musk had previously accused "certain oligarchs" in India of hindering Starlink's launch, suggesting they aim to preserve a "monopolistic chokehold" over the sector. He did not specify any individual at the time. Following these comments, the Indian government defended its regulatory framework, stating it is "fair and non-discriminatory." According to The Hindu, Starlink has received authorization for global mobile personal communications by satellite from the Department of Telecommunications but has yet to obtain the necessary security clearances to start operations. Some of the security rules, revised in May, require SpaceX to disable Starlink receivers bought outside India and terminals sold domestically if they are taken abroad. Musk further questioned whether "Ambani is the real boss" of India, referencing Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani. He pointed out that Starlink is licensed in over 165 countries and has spent five years adhering to Indian regulations, asking why it still lacks a license. He also asked if "Prime Minister Ambani" would allow Starlink to compete in India. Reliance had not commented on these allegations initially. However, the company reiterated its stance on Friday, emphasizing that it supports competition in satellite communications and believes all players must adhere to Indian laws and policies. In a separate development, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi addressed Musk's remarks, expressing concern over the implication that a foreign entity could question India's leadership. Owaisi criticized the BJP for appearing apprehensive in the presence of foreign influence, stressing that the interests of Indian citizens should take precedence over those of foreign businessmen. Musk's criticism of New Delhi started on October 7, prompting a public exchange with the government. The Communications Ministry dismissed the allegations as "baseless and misconceived," asserting that India's satellite communications framework is fair and non-discriminatory. It confirmed that security assessments for three entities, including Starlink, were ongoing and that all were at "broadly the same regulatory stage." Reliance Industries' response highlighted its growth in an environment welcoming both domestic and international investments aimed at improving people's lives. The company advocates for satellite spectrum to be auctioned similarly to terrestrial telecom spectrum, a practice not followed in any other market where Starlink currently operates. Reliance cited the resolution of the 2G spectrum case in the Supreme Court, which mandated that all scarce natural resources be allocated through auctions. Jio entered India's competitive telecom market in 2016 with no existing customer base. Within a decade, it gained the trust of over 530 million customers, offering some of the best digital infrastructure and most affordable data in the world. The company welcomed competition in satellite communications, including Starlink, and stressed that all players, including Jio, must serve the people of India and comply with local laws and policies.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 855 days ago
‘Never feared competition’: Reliance after Musk accuses Ambani of stalling Starlink India launch

Reliance Industries responded to Elon Musk's accusations that Indian 'oligarchs' are hindering the launch of Starlink in India. Reliance stated it has 'never feared competition' and emphasized that the Indian market's openness depends on the rule of law, which applies equally to domestic and foreign companies. The company noted that its own satellite services via Jio Space Technology are awaiting regulatory approvals. Starlink, operated by SpaceX, would enter a competitive market alongside Jio Space Technology and Eutelsat OneWeb, supported by Bharti Airtel. Musk previously claimed that certain Indian business leaders are obstructing Starlink's entry into the country.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Reliance's response to Musk's claims without taking a side. It quotes both parties and explains the regulatory landscape in India, providing balanced information without overtly favoring either Reliance or Musk.

Why factuality (92): This article accurately captures Reliance's response to Musk's accusations, noting the company's emphasis on the rule of law and equal treatment of all applicants. It also mentions Jio's pending clearances and the competitive landscape involving Starlink, Jio Space Technology, and Eutelsat OneWeb. T

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the situation in a relatively neutral manner, quoting Reliance directly and mentioning Musk's unverified claims. However, it frames the issue as a response to Musk's accusations rather than providing balanced coverage of both sides. The tone leans slightly toward supporting Reli

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
Amid Starlink row, Owaisi says he opposes Modi, but how can a ‘gora’ question India’s PM?

The controversy began after Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, criticized delays in granting Starlink, his satellite internet service, permission to operate commercially in India. AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi responded by criticizing the BJP government for allegedly being overly cautious about foreign influence, particularly highlighting Musk's comments about India's leadership. Owaisi emphasized that opposing Prime Minister Narendra Modi does not equate to supporting foreign interference in India's affairs. The issue has sparked broader political debate, with the opposition questioning the government's relationship with major corporations. The Indian government denied claims of discrimination, stating that its regulatory process for satellite communications is fair and non-discriminatory.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Owaisi's criticisms of the government and the government's rebuttal to Musk's claims, offering perspectives from multiple sides without overtly favoring one. There is no clear editorializing or biased language that leans strongly toward either side.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the controversy involving Elon Musk questioning the delay in Starlink's operations in India and Owaisi's response. It cites ANI as the source for Owaisi's statements and provides context about the political implications. However, it does not provide full quotes or deta

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'gorachamdi' (white skin) and frames the situation as an attack on nationalism by implying the BJP is 'afraid of white skin.' This framing may introduce bias by suggesting a specific interpretation of the BJP's stance without presenting counterpoints.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories