ON
← Back to feed
Tonchi Tadic: 'Saudi Arabia wants nuclear energy because Iran is closer to a nuclear arsenal'
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter24 days ago

Tonchi Tadic: 'Saudi Arabia wants nuclear energy because Iran is closer to a nuclear arsenal'

Fizičar i stručnjak za nuklearnu sigurnost Tonči Tadić analizira nuklearne programe na Bliskom istoku, posebno fokusirajući se na Saudijsku Arabiju i Irana. Tadić objašnjava kako države kao što su Saudijska Arabija i Sjedinjene Američke Države potpisale su Sporazum 123 o civilnoj nukarnoj energiji i neširenju nuklearnog oružja, ali izostavljen je dio o strogom nadzoru IAE. Ovo je izazvalo zabrinutost u Izraelu i drugim državama regije. Tadić navodi da Iran ne mora razvijati sofisticirano nuklearno oružje, može napraviti jednostavnu bombu, i da bi napad na Iran mogao ubrzati njegov razvoj. Također opominje da bi razvoj iranskog nuklearnog arsenala mogao potaknuti utrku u naoružanju u regiji, uključujući Saudijsku Arabiju, UAE i Tursku. Tadić također naglašava da IAEA može nadzorovati samo države koje su potpisnice Sporazuma o neširenju nuklearnog oružja, kao što je Izrael, koji nije potpisnik.

The U.S. military conducted a series of attacks against targets in Iran early Thursday, according to a statement released by the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). The strikes were described as a powerful response to Iranian attempts earlier in the week to strike American forces in the Middle East with ballistic missiles. According to CENTCOM, the targets included command centers, facilities for producing ballistic missiles and drones, coastal surveillance and defense installations, and maritime assets. The attacks took place during the night and aimed to further reduce the threat posed by Iran and its proxies to U.S. forces, commercial shipping, and neighboring countries in the Persian Gulf. The U.S. military confirmed that Tehran had launched several ballistic missiles toward American forces in the Middle East early Wednesday, marking the first recorded attack by Iran since Washington halted its strikes on Iranian targets over the weekend. According to CENTCOM, all projectiles were intercepted, though the specific locations targeted by Iran were not disclosed. Iranian state television cited statements from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claiming that the missiles struck an American military base in Jordan. Jordanian armed forces announced they had intercepted five ballistic missiles launched from Iran. Following these developments, U.S. forces and their ally Saudi Arabia carried out attacks in Iraq targeting individuals the U.S. military described as terrorists supported by Iran. CENTCOM stated that these operations were in response to more than 30 drone attacks by the IRGC over the past three days. The timing of the U.S. strikes coincided with reports of explosions in southern Iran. State media linked to the IRGC, including the Fars News Agency, reported that the attacks occurred on Kish Island in the Strait of Hormuz and in the Bushehr province. The sequence of events began on Wednesday morning when Iran reportedly launched ballistic missiles toward U.S. positions in the region. This followed a period of relative calm after the U.S. suspended its attacks on Iranian sites over the weekend. The Iranian government has long been accused of supporting militant groups in the region, and recent tensions have escalated due to ongoing conflicts involving U.S.-backed forces and Iranian-backed militias. According to CENTCOM, the U.S. military's actions were intended to degrade Iran’s ability to conduct future attacks and protect regional stability. The attacks on Iranian infrastructure were part of a broader strategy to disrupt Iran’s military capabilities and deter further aggression. The U.S. military emphasized that the strikes were carefully planned and executed to minimize collateral damage while achieving strategic objectives. In response to the U.S. strikes, Iranian officials have condemned the actions as an escalation of hostilities. The IRGC has warned of potential retaliatory measures, although no immediate plans have been announced. Meanwhile, regional allies of both the United States and Iran have expressed concern over the rising tensions and called for de-escalation efforts. The situation highlights the complex web of alliances and rivalries in the Middle East, where the U.S. and Iran have been locked in a prolonged conflict over influence and security. Recent months have seen a series of incidents involving drone attacks, missile launches, and cross-border clashes, all contributing to an increasingly volatile environment. The latest attacks underscore the fragile nature of the current ceasefire and the risk of renewed large-scale conflict. Military analysts suggest that the U.S. will continue to monitor Iran’s activities closely and maintain a readiness posture to respond to any further provocations. At the same time, diplomatic channels remain open, with international mediators seeking to facilitate dialogue between the two sides. However, the effectiveness of such efforts remains uncertain given the deep-seated mistrust and competing interests between the U.S. and Iran.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7527 days ago
Tonchi Tadic: 'Saudi Arabia wants nuclear energy because Iran is closer to a nuclear arsenal'

Fizičar i stručnjak za nuklearnu sigurnost Tonči Tadić analizira nuklearne programe na Bliskom istoku, posebno fokusirajući se na Saudijsku Arabiju i Irana. Tadić objašnjava kako države kao što su Saudijska Arabija i Sjedinjene Američke Države potpisale su Sporazum 123 o civilnoj nukarnoj energiji i neširenju nuklearnog oružja, ali izostavljen je dio o strogom nadzoru IAE. Ovo je izazvalo zabrinutost u Izraelu i drugim državama regije. Tadić navodi da Iran ne mora razvijati sofisticirano nuklearno oružje, može napraviti jednostavnu bombu, i da bi napad na Iran mogao ubrzati njegov razvoj. Također opominje da bi razvoj iranskog nuklearnog arsenala mogao potaknuti utrku u naoružanju u regiji, uključujući Saudijsku Arabiju, UAE i Tursku. Tadić također naglašava da IAEA može nadzorovati samo države koje su potpisnice Sporazuma o neširenju nuklearnog oružja, kao što je Izrael, koji nije potpisnik.

Bias read (Center): Tadić prezentira analizu nuklearnih programa i geopolitičkih tjeskobnih faktora bez jasno izraženog stranih ili domaćeg političkog stajališta. Nema evidentnog opterećenja ka lijevoj ili desnoj strani, već neutralna analiza iz perspektive stručnjaka. Iako tematika je politički naponirana, tekst ne iz

Why factuality (85): Article accurately reports Tadić’s comments on Saudi Arabia’s nuclear energy plans and the implications of the 123 Agreement, aligning with the primary source document. It mentions the lack of IAEA oversight and political tensions but does not include specific quotes from the original interview, red

Why objectivity (75): The tone leans slightly towards concern over the geopolitical risks of Saudi nuclear development, though it remains relatively neutral. The focus on potential dangers may reflect a bias toward caution rather than neutrality.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 7224 days ago
The US military has carried out a series of attacks on targets in Iran

Američka vojska je izvela niz napada na ciljeve u Iranu, opisavši ih kao 'moćan' odgovor na pokušaje Irana da balističkim projektilima pogodi američke snage na Bliskom istoku. Napadi su ciljali zapovjedna središta, proizvodnju balističkih projektila i bespilotnih letjelica, te objekte za nadzor obale i obranu. Irska državna televizija je tvrdila da su rakete gađale američku vojnu bazu u Jordanu, dok su jordanske snage presrele pet balističkih projektila. Američke snage i Saudijska Arabija su izveli napade u Iraku protiv terorista kojeg podupiru iranci, smatrajući to odgovorom na preko 30 napada IRGC-a bespilotnim letjalicama tijekom proteklog 72 sati.

Bias read (Center): Članak neutralno prikazuje događaje između SAD-a i Irana, bez jasne strane pozicije. Prikazuje i američke napade na iranske ciljeve i iranske reakcije, uz navođenje izvora kao što su američko središnje zapovjedništvo (CENTCOM) i iranska državna televizija. Nema evidentnog opterećenja ni jedne strane

Why factuality (85): The article reports on U.S. military strikes in Iran based on statements from CENTCOM and Iranian state media. It provides details about the targets and the context of the attacks as reported by multiple sources including Reuters and Iranian outlets. The information aligns with cross-source consensu

Why objectivity (72): The article presents the U.S. perspective with some emphasis on the 'powerful' response, but also includes Iranian state media accounts. While it does not overtly take sides, the framing leans slightly towards the U.S. narrative, particularly in describing the strikes as a 'powerful' response. There

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories