Americans face higher back-to-school costs. Here's what's pricier.
As back-to-school season approaches, families in the U.S. are expected to face significantly higher costs for school supplies and meals, according to a new analysis by The Century Foundation and Groundwork Collaborative. The cost of a typical basket of school items—including notebooks, lunch boxes, and index cards—has risen nearly 8% compared to 2025, while the cost of a typical school lunch has increased by 11%. Families are projected to spend around $4,000 per student on supplies and lunches, with approximately $175 allocated for school items and $3,800 for packed lunches. Experts attribute the price hikes to factors such as higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods, increased energy costs due to geopolitical tensions, and inflationary pressures. Companies like Newell Brands and Logitech have cited rising tariffs and energy costs as reasons for raising prices.
These 16 states are offering tax-free shopping days as back-to-school costs soar to over $800 per student Families across the United States are preparing for another financially challenging back-to-school season, with average costs rising to more than $800 per child. In response, 16 states have announced plans to offer tax-free shopping periods to help ease the burden on households. The decision comes as inflation continues to strain budgets, with many parents and students scrambling to find affordable options for school supplies and necessities. The latest data from The Century Foundation and Groundwork Collaborative reveals that the cost of a typical basket of school items, including notebooks, lunch boxes, and index cards, has increased by nearly 8% compared to last year. A typical school lunch has also become 11% more expensive, pushing overall family expenditures to around $4,000 per student. This includes approximately $175 spent on school-related items and $3,800 on packed lunches. The rise in costs reflects broader economic pressures, including higher gas prices and ongoing trade tensions that have impacted the availability and affordability of essential goods. According to Lindsay Owens, executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, the situation represents one of the largest financial challenges for American families. “It’s the second-biggest shopping event of the year after Christmas, and families are going to be facing a lot of pain this school year,” she said. Owens noted that higher gas prices have influenced food and clothing costs, while tariffs have significantly affected the pricing of school supplies. Most school supplies are imported, making them vulnerable to fluctuating international trade policies and energy costs. The impact of tariffs is evident in several major manufacturers. Newell Brands, which produces Sharpie pens, Elmer’s glue, and other classroom essentials, recently announced price increases to offset higher import duties. Similarly, Matteo Anversa, chief financial officer of Logitech, attributed a substantial portion of its U.S. price hikes to increased tariffs. Other companies, such as Acco Brands, which owns the Mead, Five Star, and Trapper Keeper lines, have also cited rising oil prices linked to regional conflicts as a key factor in their decisions to raise prices. The surge in school supply costs has prompted some parents to seek alternative solutions. A recent survey by Credit Karma found that 45% of parents anticipate taking on debt to cover back-to-school expenses. Meanwhile, half of all families plan to reduce other household spending to manage these costs. “Parents do what they can to try to get their kids to school with the essentials, so it’s not surprising folks are cutting back to make sure their kids have what they need,” Owens explained. With inflation slowing slightly to an annual rate of 3.5% in June, down from 4.2% in May, the economic landscape remains uncertain. However, gas prices have risen again in July due to renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. These developments continue to affect both everyday expenses and the broader economy, adding to the pressure on families during the critical back-to-school period. As the shopping season approaches, the combination of state-level tax incentives and continued cost increases will shape how families navigate this challenging financial environment.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
As back-to-school season approaches, families in the U.S. are expected to face significantly higher costs for school supplies and meals, according to a new analysis by The Century Foundation and Groundwork Collaborative. The cost of a typical basket of school items—including notebooks, lunch boxes, and index cards—has risen nearly 8% compared to 2025, while the cost of a typical school lunch has increased by 11%. Families are projected to spend around $4,000 per student on supplies and lunches, with approximately $175 allocated for school items and $3,800 for packed lunches. Experts attribute the price hikes to factors such as higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods, increased energy costs due to geopolitical tensions, and inflationary pressures. Companies like Newell Brands and Logitech have cited rising tariffs and energy costs as reasons for raising prices.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses economic factors affecting everyday consumers, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents information from multiple sources, including both progressive organizations and corporate earnings reports, without overtly favoring one side over another. The framing,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the findings from The Century Foundation and Groundwork Collaborative regarding the increase in back-to-school costs, citing specific percentages and figures. It includes direct quotes from Lindsay Owens of Groundwork Collaborative, aligning with the primary source. Ho
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but does show a slight bias by attributing the price increases to 'tariffs' and 'higher gas prices,' which are framed as negative outcomes. While it presents facts objectively, the inclusion of quotes from a progressive organization may subtly influenc
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 809 days ago
The article discusses the rising cost of back-to-school expenses, noting that these costs have exceeded $800 per student. It highlights how inflation is affecting household budgets and prompting parents and students to seek out deals and bargains during the back-to-school season. The piece mentions that 16 U.S. states are offering tax-free shopping days to help alleviate some of the financial pressure associated with purchasing school supplies and clothing.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about state-level tax policies aimed at reducing financial burdens on families, without overtly endorsing or criticizing the measures. It focuses on factual reporting about economic conditions and state responses, maintaining a balanced tone by presenting the issue客观
Why factuality (60): This article only mentions that back-to-school costs are rising and references the general trend without providing specific data points or sources. It fails to cite The Century Foundation and Groundwork Collaborative directly, nor does it provide any concrete numbers or contextual information about
Why objectivity (80): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing on the practical aspects of finding bargains rather than assigning blame or discussing policy impacts. It avoids taking sides and focuses on the consumer experience, thus maintaining a high level of objectivity.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.