ON
← Back to feed
One in ten young teens were sent sexual messages online last year and faced a wave of violent and criminal content, first survey of its kind finds
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

One in ten young teens were sent sexual messages online last year and faced a wave of violent and criminal content, first survey of its kind finds

A new survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reveals that over one in ten young teenagers aged 13 to 15 in England and Wales received sexual messages online in the past year, with a significant portion facing exposure to violent or criminal content. The study found that 12% of participants received at least one sexual message, with 25% of girls receiving such messages from individuals aged 18 or older. Over a third of respondents encountered violent or criminal content, and nearly one in five were exposed to content promoting eating disorders. The report highlights concerns about online safety and calls for greater regulation of social media platforms. It also notes that most children unintentionally encountered harmful content, raising questions about the role of algorithmic recommendations. The findings have sparked discussions about potential government action, including proposed bans on social media for under-16s.

One in ten young teens were sent sexual messages online last year, according to the first survey of its kind, revealing widespread exposure to harmful content. The findings, based on data collected from over 6,000 children aged 10 to 15 in England and Wales, show that 12 percent of children aged 13 to 15 received at least one sexual message within the past 12 months. Of these, a quarter received such messages more than ten times, and nearly one in five were sent them by individuals aged 18 or older, indicating a potential risk of predatory behavior through online platforms. Girls were disproportionately affected, with 25 percent receiving messages from adults, compared to approximately 12 percent of boys. The survey highlights the extent of online dangers facing young people, with over a third, 37 percent, exposed to violent or criminal content. This includes instances of physical violence, such as fights between individuals or groups, which accounted for 34 percent of all violent content encountered. Additionally, nearly one in five children, 19 percent, reported encountering content promoting eating disorders, while 15 percent saw similar material related to sexual imagery or videos. Over 12 percent were exposed to content encouraging self-harm, much of which was encountered unintentionally. Most children who viewed harmful content did so without actively seeking it out, underscoring the passive nature of exposure in digital environments. The survey also revealed gender disparities in exposure to harmful content. Girls were more likely than boys to encounter hate speech, eating disorder-related content, and self-harm encouragement. Specifically, 21 percent of girls versus 17 percent of boys reported seeing a significant amount of hate-based content. For eating disorder content, 10 percent of girls compared to just 3 percent of boys saw substantial amounts. Girls were also more likely to search for such content, with 16 percent doing so versus 7 percent of boys. These differences suggest that young women may be particularly vulnerable to the psychological impacts of online exposure. Among the key findings, 68 percent of children who received sexual messages deemed them unwanted, with girls significantly more likely to experience this, 84 percent versus 49 percent of boys. Nearly half of those who received unwanted content, 53 percent, told someone about it, though the exact mechanisms for reporting or addressing such issues remain unclear. Some children admitted to sharing unwanted content without consent, with 11 percent stating that at least one message had been shared publicly or shown to others without their approval. The survey also documented extensive screen time among young people, with 84 percent of children aged 10 to 15 spending three or more hours online each weekend. A quarter spent seven or more hours daily on weekends, while two-thirds spent three or more hours online during weekdays. Smartphones were the primary device used, with 88 percent relying on them for internet access, followed by desktop computers and laptops, which were used by 62 percent. Common online activities included watching videos, reels, vlogs, or livestreams, which 83 percent engaged in, and messaging, which 76 percent participated in. The findings have prompted renewed discussions about the role of social media companies in safeguarding young users. With the UK government planning to ban social media for under-16s starting next spring, concerns persist about how effectively such measures will address broader risks. While the Office for National Statistics conducted this survey via online methods, marking a shift from previous in-person approaches, questions remain about the long-term impact of proposed restrictions and how best to support young people's online safety.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 809/2/2026
Almost half of children exposed to harmful social media content, survey reveals

A survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) found that nearly half of children aged 10 to 15 in the UK have been exposed to harmful content online, including hate speech, violent material, and content promoting self-harm or eating disorders. The data showed that 48% of children reported seeing 'a lot' or 'a fair amount' of harmful content, while 37% encountered violent or criminal content. The findings come amid plans for stricter regulations on social media platforms and gaming sites, which will restrict access for users under 16 starting next spring. The survey also highlighted gender disparities, with girls experiencing higher rates of exposure to harmful content, particularly related to sexual messages and self-harm encouragement.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual survey results without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific policies or political groups. While it discusses government actions and proposed regulations, it does not frame these measures as inherently positive or negative. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the数据

Why factuality (90): The Independent article cites the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and provides detailed statistics that match those mentioned in the Daily Mail article. It includes specific percentages and sample sizes, enhancing its credibility and alignment with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (80): The Independent presents the information in a relatively neutral manner, focusing on reporting the survey results without overtly emotional language. However, it does mention the upcoming government restrictions on social media for under-16s, which may introduce a slight bias towards policy implicat

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 709/2/2026
One in ten young teens were sent sexual messages online last year and faced a wave of violent and criminal content, first survey of its kind finds

A new survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reveals that over one in ten young teenagers aged 13 to 15 in England and Wales received sexual messages online in the past year, with a significant portion facing exposure to violent or criminal content. The study found that 12% of participants received at least one sexual message, with 25% of girls receiving such messages from individuals aged 18 or older. Over a third of respondents encountered violent or criminal content, and nearly one in five were exposed to content promoting eating disorders. The report highlights concerns about online safety and calls for greater regulation of social media platforms. It also notes that most children unintentionally encountered harmful content, raising questions about the role of algorithmic recommendations. The findings have sparked discussions about potential government action, including proposed bans on social media for under-16s.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from a government-backed survey without overtly endorsing specific political solutions. While it raises concerns about online safety and mentions government proposals, it does not take a clear ideological stance on the issue. The framing remains balanced, focusingon

Why factuality (85): The Daily Mail article provides specific statistics such as 'one in ten' young teens receiving sexual messages and 'over a third' being exposed to violent or criminal content. These numbers align closely with the data presented in The Independent article, suggesting a shared factual basis. However,

Why objectivity (70): The Daily Mail uses emotionally charged terms like 'wave of violent and criminal content' and implies predatory behavior by stating 'many predators are using online platforms.' This language introduces a biased tone and suggests intent rather than presenting neutral findings.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories