Map Shows Trump’s Approval Rating in Every State 100 Days Before Midterms
A new poll conducted by Civiqs shows that President Donald Trump's approval ratings have declined nationwide and in key battleground states 100 days before the 2026 midterm elections. According to the data, Trump currently holds a net approval rating of -19 nationally, with 38% approval and 57% disapproval. While he retains strong support in Republican strongholds like Wyoming, North Dakota, and West Virginia, these states have experienced notable drops in approval compared to the start of his second term. In contrast, all major swing states, such as Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Florida, are now showing negative net approval ratings for Trump. This shift suggests that even small changes in voter sentiment could influence the outcome of the midterms and potentially alter control of Congress.
Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest individual and chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX, is making a major move to bolster the Republican Party ahead of the November 2026 midterm elections. According to Axios, Musk plans to revive his super PAC, America PAC, which played a crucial role in helping elect President Donald Trump in 2024. This renewed effort includes extensive grassroots outreach, digital advertising, and direct mail campaigns aimed at increasing voter turnout among conservative voters, particularly those who tend to stay home in non-presidential election years. While Musk’s representatives have not disclosed specific funding amounts, expectations suggest the investment could be substantial, given his previous contributions to the GOP. James Blair, a senior political adviser to President Trump, emphasized the significance of America PAC’s return, stating that its involvement would provide a considerable boost to Republicans nationwide. “America PAC was an essential partner for our historic GOTV operation in 2024, and their return for 2026 is a huge boost for Republicans across the country,” Blair said. He added that the GOP aims to outmaneuver its opponents and execute its mission “ruthlessly” between now and Election Day. This move comes at a critical juncture for Republicans, whose control of both the House and Senate is under threat due to Trump’s declining approval ratings, particularly regarding the economy and the ongoing conflict with Iran. Despite this, GOP super PACs and committees currently hold a $300 million advantage over their Democratic counterparts, excluding the $400 million in funds held by Trump’s MAGA Inc. super PAC. Musk’s financial support is expected to amplify this lead, allowing Republicans to better compete in an environment where Democrats appear to have a slight edge in national polling. Musk’s decision to reengage with the GOP marks a notable turnaround from earlier tensions with Trump. Last year, Musk criticized Trump for allegedly covering up aspects of the Jeffrey Epstein case and suggested the president might be implicated. However, relations have since improved, culminating in a public reconciliation at the memorial service for Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. Both Musk and Trump expressed optimism about mending their relationship, with Kirk having previously worked to unite the two. According to The Daily Wire, Musk’s reentry into the political fray involves a strategic focus on battleground states, with an emphasis on door-knocking and targeted advertising. His involvement is expected to complement existing GOP efforts, allowing other organizations to concentrate on television advertisements. The leadership of this initiative falls to Musk’s top political advisor, Chris Young. Meanwhile, in Texas, a different dynamic is unfolding as a left-leaning organization, Somos Votantes, seeks to mobilize Latino voters, who have shown a tendency to shift towards the GOP in recent elections. The group is allocating $6 million to organize these voters, with a particular focus on three South Texas House districts where Republicans won decisively in 2024. Melissa Morales, founder of Somos Votantes, highlighted the importance of reconnecting with Latino voters, emphasizing the need for a compelling economic vision from Democratic candidates to attract those disillusioned with current political trends. As the midterms approach, the political landscape continues to evolve, with both parties recognizing the importance of voter engagement and strategic messaging. While Republicans benefit from a robust financial advantage, Democrats are leveraging their growing influence among certain demographics, particularly in key states like Texas. The upcoming elections will hinge on the effectiveness of these strategies and the ability of both parties to connect with their respective bases.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
A new poll conducted by Civiqs shows that President Donald Trump's approval ratings have declined nationwide and in key battleground states 100 days before the 2026 midterm elections. According to the data, Trump currently holds a net approval rating of -19 nationally, with 38% approval and 57% disapproval. While he retains strong support in Republican strongholds like Wyoming, North Dakota, and West Virginia, these states have experienced notable drops in approval compared to the start of his second term. In contrast, all major swing states, such as Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Florida, are now showing negative net approval ratings for Trump. This shift suggests that even small changes in voter sentiment could influence the outcome of the midterms and potentially alter control of Congress.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual polling data without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports both Trump's current approval numbers and their decline over time, noting that he is underwater in key battleground states. The framing is neutral, focusing on statistical trends rather than a
Why factuality (85): The article accurately presents the Civiqs poll data and its implications for the 2026 midterms. It provides specific percentages and geographic breakdowns that align with the cross-source consensus. The information is well-sourced and presented clearly.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the data rather than taking a political stance. However, it does highlight the significance of Trump being 'underwater' in key battleground states, which could be interpreted as slightly emphasizing the challenge for Republicans.
The HillIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7510 days ago
A new Politico poll reveals that nearly half of Americans cannot explain the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Trump signed into law in 2025. The poll, conducted between July 13-15, found that 49% of respondents either hadn't heard of the legislation or couldn't describe it. The bill, which includes significant spending cuts to Medicaid and food aid, has become a political weapon for Democrats in midterm elections. While Trump praised the bill as a 'triumph of democracy,' the poll indicates mixed public sentiment, with 32% reporting worsened financial situations and 22% saying their finances improved.
Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced reporting by citing both the political strategy of Democrats using the bill against Republicans and the public's mixed reaction to its economic impacts. It does not overtly favor one side over another, though it highlights the controversy surrounding the legislation. No
Why factuality (85): The article references a Politico poll with specific percentages and details about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. It explains the controversy surrounding the legislation and its impact on different groups. The facts are presented clearly and consistently with the poll results.
Why objectivity (75): The article remains relatively neutral in tone, presenting the poll results and the legislative impact without overtly taking sides. However, it mentions how Democrats are using the bill in their campaigns, which could be seen as slightly biased depending on the reader's perspective.
NewsweekIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7510 days ago
Newsweek has compiled reader reactions to recent polling data indicating President Donald Trump's lowest net approval rating of his second term. The discussion highlights differing perspectives on whether Trump's support is waning or remaining strong. Critics argue that Trump has failed to keep promises and negatively impacted the economy and foreign relations, while supporters dismiss the polling as unreliable and claim his base remains loyal. Readers also expressed concern about the potential impact on Republican prospects in the 2026 midterms, particularly in key swing states.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple reader perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes both criticisms of Trump's policies and defenses of his support, reflecting a balanced presentation of opinions rather than a clear ideological slant.
Why factuality (80): The article accurately references the Civiqs poll and mentions the decline in Trump's approval ratings. It aligns with the primary source by noting the net approval rating and the implications for the midterms. However, it includes reader comments that introduce subjective perspectives.
Why objectivity (75): The article attempts to present a balanced view by including reader comments with differing opinions. However, the inclusion of reader commentary slightly affects its neutrality, as it leans on external input rather than presenting a purely objective analysis.
NewsweekIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 5510 days ago
Recent polling data indicates growing dissatisfaction among independent voters towards President Donald Trump, with declining approval ratings on key issues such as jobs, the economy, immigration, and overall national direction. Multiple reputable polling organizations, including YouGov/Economist, Fox News, and Echelon Insights, report that independent voters have become significantly more negative toward Trump since the start of his second term. This shift raises concerns for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, as independent voters historically play a decisive role in determining election outcomes. The data suggests a broadening discontent with Trump’s leadership, potentially impacting both his re-election prospects and the broader Republican agenda.
Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced reporting by citing multiple polling organizations and highlighting the shifting sentiments of independent voters without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. While the content focuses on potential risks for Republicans, it does not frame the issue in a sl
Why factuality (65): The article references a Civiqs poll but primarily discusses reader comments and interpretations of Trump's approval ratings rather than presenting specific data from the poll. It mentions a 'new poll showing Trump's net approval rating at its lowest point,' which aligns with the Civiqs data, but th
Why objectivity (55): The article presents a mix of reader opinions and general commentary, which introduces subjectivity. While it acknowledges differing viewpoints, it doesn't maintain strict neutrality in its framing of the discussion around Trump's approval ratings, allowing personal interpretations to influence the
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
United States
