ON
← Back to feed
Alibaba bans staff from using Claude Code over Anthropic spyware concerns
HK🏛️ Politics13 hr. ago

Alibaba bans staff from using Claude Code over Anthropic spyware concerns

Alibaba Group Holding has banned its employees from using Anthropic's Claude Code due to security concerns stemming from Anthropic's past use of hidden code to track Chinese users. The decision follows revelations by security researchers who identified potential backdoor risks in the software. Alibaba stated that Claude Code has been classified as high-risk software with security vulnerabilities and will be prohibited for use in the office starting July 10. The issue arose from Anthropic's embedding of code in its platform that could secretly determine if a user was located in China or associated with a Chinese AI laboratory. Alibaba, which owns the South China Morning Post, did not immediately respond to requests for further comment.

1 reports

South China Morning Post logoSouth China Morning PostIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7013 hr. ago
Alibaba bans staff from using Claude Code over Anthropic spyware concerns

Alibaba Group Holding has banned its employees from using Anthropic's Claude Code due to security concerns stemming from Anthropic's past use of hidden code to track Chinese users. The decision follows revelations by security researchers who identified potential backdoor risks in the software. Alibaba stated that Claude Code has been classified as high-risk software with security vulnerabilities and will be prohibited for use in the office starting July 10. The issue arose from Anthropic's embedding of code in its platform that could secretly determine if a user was located in China or associated with a Chinese AI laboratory. Alibaba, which owns the South China Morning Post, did not immediately respond to requests for further comment.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, focusing on Alibaba's response to security concerns raised by external researchers regarding Anthropic's software. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The focus,

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is high as the article reports on a specific action taken by Alibaba based on security concerns, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, the article is published by the South China Morning Post, which is owned by Alibaba, potentially introducing bias. Objectivity is lower due t

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories