ON
← Back to feed
Alejandra Jalof: "Writing and psychoanalysis are closely related"
AR🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive11 days ago

Alejandra Jalof: "Writing and psychoanalysis are closely related"

Alejandra Jalof, a writer and psychoanalyst, discusses the parallels between writing and psychoanalysis in an interview with +Perfil. She argues that both fields involve challenging commonplaces in language, everyday expressions and shared meanings, that people take for granted. Jalof explains that while daily communication relies on these shared understandings, literature aims to question them. She emphasizes that writers often do not know precisely what they want to create but can identify what they wish to exclude from their work. This approach mirrors psychoanalysis, which seeks to uncover hidden meanings in speech that individuals might not consciously recognize.

In Buenos Aires, a literary debate has unfolded over the role of language in society, with one writer arguing that writers must challenge common assumptions and use their craft as a tool for critical thought. The discussion centers around the work of Alejandra Jalof, a writer and psychoanalyst whose new book explores the relationship between writing and the unconscious mind. In a recent interview with Perfil, Jalof described her approach to writing as one that deliberately disrupts the accepted norms of everyday language, using it as both a weapon and a shield. Jalof explained that she sees a deep connection between her practice as a psychoanalyst and her work as a writer. Both disciplines, she argued, involve uncovering hidden meanings within seemingly ordinary expressions. She emphasized that while daily communication relies on shared linguistic conventions, such as the phrase “¿todo bien?”, writing allows for a more radical interrogation of these norms. For her, writing is not merely a means of conveying information but an act of resistance against the passive acceptance of established meanings. She pointed out that this process is particularly relevant in times when authoritarian figures seek to control public discourse. According to Jalof, the exercise of professional and critical journalism is essential to democracy, and it often provokes discomfort among those who believe they hold exclusive access to truth. Her argument suggests that literature, too, plays a vital role in challenging dominant narratives and exposing the subtle ways in which meaning is shaped and controlled. Jalof described the concept of the “common sense” as a kind of obstacle that writers must actively confront. Rather than allowing familiar expressions to dictate the direction of a text, she believes writers should question them, revealing alternative interpretations. This, she said, is akin to the work of a psychoanalyst, who identifies unconscious patterns embedded in speech that go unnoticed by the speaker themselves. She called this phenomenon “what passes as contraband in speaking,” suggesting that such insights can lead to moments of revelation or epiphany. The writer also highlighted how this method manifests in her own writing. She described certain small, seemingly insignificant details as “divine details”, moments that, when explored, reveal deeper layers of meaning. These details, she argued, are not just aesthetic choices but crucial elements that allow the written word to transcend mere communication and become an act of exploration and intervention. For Jalof, the goal of writing is not simply to reproduce existing meanings but to pause before them, to examine what might be overlooked or suppressed. She sees this as a core aspect of both literary creation and psychoanalysis, where the act of stopping to look closely at what appears obvious can open up new possibilities for understanding. Her latest works, Fotosíntesis and Linaje Caníbal, reflect this philosophy. Through them, she invites readers to engage with language not as a fixed system but as a dynamic space that can be questioned, challenged, and transformed. By doing so, she argues, writing becomes more than a form of expression, it becomes a site of political and intellectual engagement.

2 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8011 days ago
Alejandra Jalof: "Writing and psychoanalysis are closely related"

Alejandra Jalof, a writer and psychoanalyst, discusses the parallels between writing and psychoanalysis in an interview with +Perfil. She argues that both fields involve challenging commonplaces in language, everyday expressions and shared meanings, that people take for granted. Jalof explains that while daily communication relies on these shared understandings, literature aims to question them. She emphasizes that writers often do not know precisely what they want to create but can identify what they wish to exclude from their work. This approach mirrors psychoanalysis, which seeks to uncover hidden meanings in speech that individuals might not consciously recognize.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on literary and psychological theory rather than directly addressing political issues, policies, or figures. It presents Jalof’s views neutrally, without overt ideological framing or biased sourcing.

Why factuality (90): The article provides detailed and accurate reporting on Alejandra Jalof’s views on the relationship between writing and psychoanalysis. The statements made by Jalof are clearly attributed and align with the cross-source consensus on her perspectives.

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a balanced tone throughout, presenting Jalof’s views without apparent bias. While it includes some interpretive commentary, it remains largely objective and avoids overtly emotional or biased language.

Página/12 logoPágina/12Party-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7511 days ago
We use pipettes as weapons and the word as the only shield

The headline 'Usamos pipetas como armas y la palabra como único escudo' suggests a metaphorical discussion about using simple tools like eyedroppers (pipettes) as weapons and words as the sole defense. The article appears to focus on the role of communication and rhetoric in political discourse, possibly highlighting the power of language in shaping narratives and countering opposition. Given the lack of specific content, the summary is based on the headline alone, which implies a critical examination of how words can serve as both a weapon and a shield in political contexts.

Bias read (Progressive): The metaphor of using 'words as the only shield' suggests a critique of traditional power structures and an emphasis on the importance of rhetoric and communication in political struggle, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that value discourse and ideological clarity over brute force.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately quotes the statement 'Usamos pipetas como armas y la palabra como único escudo' as reported by Página/12. The content aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the themes of using language as resistance. However, there is limited contextual information provided beyond t

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the quote neutrally but lacks broader context or explanation, which may leave readers with an incomplete understanding. It does not appear to favor any particular perspective, though it could have offered more background to maintain full neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories