ON
← Back to feed
AISA and AIDSO condemn police lathi charge on students in New Delhi
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive12 days ago

AISA and AIDSO condemn police lathi charge on students in New Delhi

Around 1,500 people participated in a protest organized by the All India Students' Association (AISA) Karnataka at Freedom Park in Bengaluru, expressing solidarity with a demonstration in New Delhi. Protesters condemned the Delhi Police for allegedly attacking peaceful demonstrators and illegally detaining Sonam Wangchuk, who was removed from Jantar Mantar. They criticized the handling of the NEET-2026 exam leak, citing a pattern of examination scandals that have harmed students. Additionally, students protested at Bangalore University under the All India Democratic Students Organization (AIDSO), criticizing the police for using lathi charges and tear gas against them. AIDSO's state treasurer stated that the planned march to Parliament was denied permission despite prior notice.

On July 20, 2026, members of the All India Students’ Association (AISA) and the All India Democratic Students Organisation (AIDSO) expressed strong condemnation of the Delhi Police's use of force against student protesters during demonstrations in New Delhi. Around 1,500 participants joined a protest organized by AISA Karnataka at Freedom Park in Bengaluru, showing solidarity with the ongoing "Chalo Sansad or Parliament March." This march, aimed at pressuring the government to resign the Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, had been publicly announced in advance. During the demonstration, protesters accused the Delhi Police of engaging in a brutal crackdown, including the use of lathi charges and tear gas, which resulted in numerous injuries among students and young activists. They specifically criticized the police for the alleged illegal abduction of Sonam Wangchuk, a prominent figure associated with the protests. The incident sparked outrage, with demonstrators arguing that the authorities' response reflected an authoritarian approach toward peaceful dissent. The protesters also raised broader concerns regarding the integrity of the education system, citing the recent NEET-2026 paper leak as part of a pattern of systemic failures. They claimed that over the years, there have been repeated instances of exam malpractice and irregularities, affecting millions of students who have suffered due to institutional negligence and corruption. In addition to condemning the police action, the protesters emphasized the importance of democratic rights, asserting that the denial of permission for the parliamentary march violated constitutional freedoms. AIDSO, led by its state treasurer Subhash B.J., reiterated that protesting is a fundamental right in a democracy and called for accountability from the authorities. Meanwhile, the Delhi Police has denied allegations made by the Chief Justice of India (CJP) regarding an assault on the wife of Sonam Wangchuk. According to official statements, the police maintain that all actions taken were within legal boundaries and necessary to ensure public order. However, these claims remain unverified, and the situation continues to draw attention from both local and national media. The protests in Bengaluru highlight growing tensions between student groups and law enforcement, particularly concerning the handling of demonstrations and the perceived erosion of civil liberties. As the debate over democratic expression and governmental authority intensifies, the role of student organizations in advocating for transparency and accountability becomes increasingly central to public discourse. Further developments are anticipated as both sides continue to engage in dialogue, with potential calls for legal action or policy reforms emerging from the ongoing unrest. The situation underscores the complex interplay between civic activism and state power, setting the stage for future confrontations and resolutions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8012 days ago
AISA and AIDSO condemn police lathi charge on students in New Delhi

Around 1,500 people participated in a protest organized by the All India Students' Association (AISA) Karnataka at Freedom Park in Bengaluru, expressing solidarity with a demonstration in New Delhi. Protesters condemned the Delhi Police for allegedly attacking peaceful demonstrators and illegally detaining Sonam Wangchuk, who was removed from Jantar Mantar. They criticized the handling of the NEET-2026 exam leak, citing a pattern of examination scandals that have harmed students. Additionally, students protested at Bangalore University under the All India Democratic Students Organization (AIDSO), criticizing the police for using lathi charges and tear gas against them. AIDSO's state treasurer stated that the planned march to Parliament was denied permission despite prior notice.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the police actions as authoritarian repression of peaceful protests, criticizes government institutions for corruption and administrative failures, and highlights demands for accountability from high-ranking officials. It emphasizes the violation of democratic rights and portrays官

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed accounts of the protests, including the number of security personnel deployed and the unexpected turnout of protesters. It describes the police's struggle to manage the situation and the impact of the protests on the Parliament session. These details are consistent with

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the logistical aspects of the protests and the police response. It avoids taking sides and presents the events as they unfolded, making it relatively balanced in its presentation.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6512 days ago
Delhi Police refutes CJP’s claim of assault on Sonam Wangchuk’s wife

The article reports that Delhi Police has denied claims made by Chief Justice of India (CJI) regarding an alleged assault on the wife of Sonam Wangchuk. The incident reportedly occurred during a protest related to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The police stated that there was no evidence to support the allegations against the protesters. The article highlights the discrepancy between the CJI's statement and the police's response, suggesting a potential conflict over the event's circumstances.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the claim by the CJI and the denial by Delhi Police without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the factual disagreement rather than taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains balanced, providing context without leaning toward any particular political or

Why factuality (70): The article accurately reports Telangana Minister Ponnam Prabhakar's condemnation of the police lathi charge. It includes specific details about the minister's statements and the reasons behind the protest, which are consistent with other articles.

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the minister's perspective sympathetically, highlighting the peaceful nature of the protest and the use of force by the police. It lacks a balanced view by not addressing the police's rationale for their actions.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories