The Madrid Provincial Court has upheld the trial with a jury against Begoña Gómez, wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, on two charges: abuse of influence and misappropriation of public funds. The court dismissed two other charges, corruption in business dealings and unauthorized appropriation, that had been brought against her by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. In a ruling released this week, the judges ordered the continuation of the proceedings with a jury against Gómez and her advisor, Cristina Álvarez, who faces one charge of misappropriating public funds related to the creation of software within the university chair that Gómez co-directed. The court partially accepted the appeals filed by the prosecution and defense against Judge Peinado’s decision to send Gómez, Álvarez, and businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés to trial with a jury. It revoked part of the judge’s order, dismissing the charges of corruption in business dealings and unauthorized appropriation against Gómez. However, the judges upheld the charges of abuse of influence and misappropriation, finding “rational indications of criminality” in these matters. Barrabés was excluded from the jury trial, and his case will proceed under an abbreviated procedure concerning the legality of public procurement contracts. The judges deliberated over five appeals and complaints against Judge Peinado’s rulings, particularly the April 11 decision sending the three individuals to trial. They acted jointly to avoid procedural issues and ensure a proper judicial response. The defense and prosecution argued that there were insufficient grounds for the charges, that the rulings lacked adequate motivation, and that a jury trial was inappropriate due to the lack of connection among the alleged crimes. The judges emphasized that Gómez used her “privileged position as the president’s spouse” to advance her career. They cited the precedent set in the Nóos case, which convicted Iñaki Urdangarin, former husband of Infanta Cristina, for abusing influence through marital ties to high government authority. According to the ruling, the mere relationship of marriage to the highest authority in the nation can exert sufficient moral pressure to constitute the crime of abuse of influence. The court noted that Gómez’s position allowed her to secure the academic chair at the Complutense University almost immediately without proper evaluation of the project proposal. She was appointed director despite lacking formal qualifications. This led to the public funding of a digital measurement tool intended for private or personal use. The judges concluded that the manner in which the request was made and the immediate approval suggested a sufficient level of moral pressure to influence the university’s decision-making process. In another key point, the court ruled that Gómez held the status of a public official from the moment she assumed co-direction of the university chair. This enabled her to engage in actions that could be considered misuse of public resources. The court also mentioned that the prosecution requested that Gómez justify her travel to attend her daughter’s graduation, highlighting further scrutiny into her activities during the investigation. The court’s decision reflects a nuanced approach to the complex legal situation surrounding Gómez, balancing the need for accountability with procedural fairness. As the trial proceeds, the outcome may have broader implications for how political connections are treated in cases involving public officials. The next steps will involve preparing for the jury trial, with both sides likely to present their arguments and evidence in the coming weeks.
3 reports
infoLibreIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 8816 days agoThe Madrid Provincial Court has decided to continue the trial with a jury against Begoña Gómez, wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, for two charges: abuse of influence and misappropriation of funds. The court dismissed two other charges—corruption in business dealings and unauthorized appropriation—against her. Additionally, the court partially accepted the prosecutors' and defense arguments against Judge Juan Carlos Peinado’s decision to send Gómez, her advisor Cristina Álvarez, and businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés to trial with a jury. While maintaining the jury trial for Gómez and Álvarez, the court removed Barrabés from the jury process, directing his case to a simplified procedure regarding public contract legality. The judges rejected claims that there were insufficient grounds for the charges, but acknowledged 'rational indications of criminality' for the remaining charges. They cited the precedent set by the Nóos case, where former spouse of a royal was convicted for similar abuses of position.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced judicial decision without overt ideological slant. It reports on the court's ruling based on legal reasoning and references past cases without taking sides. The framing remains neutral, focusing on procedural outcomes rather than political implications.
Why factuality (92): This article provides detailed information about the Audiencia's decision to continue the trial with a jury for two charges, while dismissing two others. It includes specifics about the legal procedures and the involvement of multiple parties, showing alignment with the cross-source consensus and pr
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the legal proceedings objectively. It avoids emotional language and presents both the court's decision and the implications without taking a clear stance on the outcome.
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 6012 days agoThe case against Begoña Gómez Fernández, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, has been reactivated by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado after the Madrid Provincial Court confirmed the trial by jury but reduced the charges from four to two: abuse of influence and embezzlement. Following this decision, Peinado requested new indictment documents from the prosecution, including the unified popular accusation led by Hazte Oír, within five days. The initial indictment had sought 24 years in prison for Begoña, but the charge of corruption in business dealings was removed, reducing the sentence by 10 years. However, the charge of embezzlement could lead to a higher penalty. Additionally, procedural steps were initiated to investigate businessman Juan Carlos Barrabás separately, as the court deemed his potential misconduct in contracts with his company unrelated to Begoña’s case. This investigation will proceed in Madrid’s 41st court, though Peinado plans to retire in September.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of legal proceedings involving high-profile political figures without overtly favoring any side. It reports on judicial actions, legal arguments, and procedural developments neutrally, avoiding loaded language or biased interpretation.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the judge’s actions and the procedural steps taken after the Audiencia de Madrid’s decision. It aligns with the cross-source consensus on the legal developments.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses phrases like 'demencial' (mad) and 'locos intentos' (crazy attempts) to describe the judge’s actions, indicating a strong bias against the judicial process. This affects the overall objectivity.
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 7816 days agoThe Provincial Court of Madrid has approved the continuation of the trial by jury against Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, for two charges: abuse of influence and embezzlement. The court partially upheld the decision by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado to bring the couple, including Sánchez’s partner and aide Cristina Álvarez, to trial on four charges, which included corruption in business dealings and misappropriation. However, the higher court overturned measures imposed by the judge, such as revoking their passports and requiring them to appear twice monthly before the court. The case continues under the jurisdiction of the jury.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings involving the spouse of Spain's prime minister in a neutral manner, focusing on judicial decisions and procedural actions without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the court's approval of the trial and the overturning of certain restrictions, without
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that the Audiencia de Madrid has allowed the trial to proceed with a jury for two charges against Begoña Gómez. It mentions the partial approval of the judge’s decision and the return of passports, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it does not provide
Why objectivity (78): The tone remains neutral, reporting facts without overt bias. However, there is some subtle emphasis on the continuation of the trial, which may slightly lean towards supporting the judicial process rather than presenting both sides equally.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Spain
