More than a dozen public interest and consumer advocacy groups have urged the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate major artificial intelligence (AI) companies for allegedly purchasing, scanning, and destroying books used to train their large language models. The groups, including the Demand Progress Education Fund and the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, describe this 'hoard-and-destroy' practice as destructive and anticompetitive, arguing that it removes nonrenewable resources from public access and creates barriers for smaller competitors. They claim that in some cases, the destroyed books are the last surviving copies of original works, potentially violating Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts in commerce. The groups reference a 2024 copyright lawsuit against AI firm Anthropic, which was later dismissed on copyright grounds, and a recent 404 Media investigation alleging similar practices at Amazon.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of AI companies as 'destructive' and 'anticompetitive,' emphasizing concerns about monopolization and the removal of public resources. It highlights the potential violation of the FTC Act and focuses on the perspective of advocacy groups, suggesting a critical stance.
Why factuality (85): The article aligns closely with the primary source document from 404 Media, confirming that Amazon is buying books, scanning them for AI training data, and destroying them. It mentions the involvement of multiple advocacy groups and references the 'hoard-and-destroy' critique, which matches the conc
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the issue with a critical tone, emphasizing the negative impact on public access to books and suggesting potential regulatory action. While it reports facts accurately, it frames the situation as a problem requiring intervention, which introduces a degree of editorial bias.



