ON
← Back to feed
AI Applications for Oil and Gas Companies Worsen Climate Pollution
World🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive8 days ago

AI Applications for Oil and Gas Companies Worsen Climate Pollution

A study published in Nature by Will and Holly Alpine, former Microsoft employees, argues that the use of artificial intelligence by oil and gas companies significantly increases global carbon emissions through 'enabled emissions.' The research suggests that AI accelerates fossil fuel extraction and production, leading to annual emissions of 0.47 to 1.8 gigatonnes of CO₂, up to 13 times higher than emissions from data centers. The study uses economic simulations to model how AI affects both fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors, concluding that AI disproportionately benefits the fossil fuel industry. While acknowledging AI's potential to enhance renewable energy and reduce emissions in other areas like transportation and agriculture, the Alpines emphasize that current assessments often overlook the extent to which AI supports fossil fuel expansion.

Oil and gas companies using artificial intelligence to locate and extract fossil fuels are significantly increasing global emissions, according to a new study led by two former Microsoft employees. The research, published in Nature, argues that the environmental impact of AI-driven fossil fuel expansion outweighs the emissions generated by the data centers that power the technology. Will and Holly Alpine, co-founders of the Enabled Emissions Campaign, conducted the study after spending years developing AI platforms. Their analysis suggests that AI tools used by oil and gas firms have accelerated production, reducing costs and improving profitability. This has led to an increase in fossil fuel output that would not have occurred under normal conditions. As a result, the study estimates that AI applications in the sector could add between 0.47 and 1.8 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide annually, representing 1.2 to 4.8 percent of global energy-related emissions in 2024. These figures surpass the International Energy Agency's previous estimates of data center emissions by up to 13 times. To arrive at these conclusions, the Alpines employed an economic simulation model that examines how economies respond to technological advancements. They evaluated the impact of AI on both the fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors, converting these effects into “productivity shocks.” By considering varying levels of AI adoption, from minimal to widespread, they aligned their findings with the International Energy Agency’s 2035 projections. This method allowed them to quantify the net effect of AI on emissions across different scenarios. Will Alpine, who previously worked on AI infrastructure, emphasized that the tools he helped build have had a dual impact. While AI can enhance renewable energy systems, optimize grid performance, and improve operational efficiency, it has simultaneously bolstered the fossil fuel industry. He described this as an “asymmetric” effect, where AI functions as an economic lever that strengthens the position of fossil fuels in the market. Holly Alpine pointed out that many discussions around AI’s climate impact focus narrowly on the trade-off between data center energy use and potential emission reductions elsewhere, such as improved flight paths or optimized urban traffic management. However, she argued that this framing overlooks the broader consequences of AI-enabled fossil fuel extraction. Another 2025 study, published in the same journal by researchers from the Grantham Research Institute and Systemiq, noted that while AI contributes to emissions through data center operations, it also holds promise for reducing emissions in key sectors like food, power, and mobility. Together, these industries account for nearly half of global greenhouse gas emissions. The study concluded that AI could play a pivotal role in accelerating the shift away from fossil fuels and transforming interconnected systems such as energy, transport, and land use. Despite these concerns, some tech giants have taken steps to mitigate AI’s environmental footprint. Google, for instance, used its DeepMind AI system to cut energy usage in data centers by 40 percent. Similarly, Microsoft has committed to sourcing all its electricity from renewable sources, reporting in 2025 that it achieved 100 percent renewable energy usage globally. A Microsoft spokesperson stated that the company continues to refine its approach as AI evolves, emphasizing its commitment to becoming carbon negative, water positive, and waste free. The spokesperson added that technology should support industry-wide decarbonization efforts while balancing current energy demands with long-term sustainability goals.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Inside Climate News logoInside Climate NewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 5010 days ago
AI Applications for Oil and Gas Companies Worsen Climate Pollution

A study published in Nature by Will and Holly Alpine, former Microsoft employees, argues that the use of artificial intelligence by oil and gas companies significantly increases global carbon emissions through 'enabled emissions.' The research suggests that AI accelerates fossil fuel extraction and production, leading to annual emissions of 0.47 to 1.8 gigatonnes of CO₂, up to 13 times higher than emissions from data centers. The study uses economic simulations to model how AI affects both fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors, concluding that AI disproportionately benefits the fossil fuel industry. While acknowledging AI's potential to enhance renewable energy and reduce emissions in other areas like transportation and agriculture, the Alpines emphasize that current assessments often overlook the extent to which AI supports fossil fuel expansion.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames AI's role in accelerating fossil fuel production as a significant threat to climate goals, emphasizing the disproportionate impact of AI on the fossil fuel sector over renewables. It highlights the environmental risks associated with AI applications in the oil and gas industry, a

Why factuality (75): The article accurately summarizes the core finding that AI-enabled fossil fuel production leads to greater emissions than the direct operational footprint of AI itself. It references the Nature study and provides specific figures (0.47–1.8 Gt CO₂/year). However, it omits nuance such as the study’s a

Why objectivity (50): The article takes a clear stance against AI in the fossil fuel sector using emotionally charged language like 'worsen climate pollution.' It frames the issue as a problem caused by tech companies without presenting counterarguments or acknowledging the dual role of AI in both sectors. The tone is bi

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 55Objective 608 days ago
Antarctic grass an ominous sign of how the world is warming

Australian scientists have discovered evidence of invasive grasses spreading across parts of Antarctica due to human-induced climate change. This development raises concerns about the potential for wildfires in the region, as seen in recent fires on Amsterdam Island and Bird Island. While the Antarctic is not uniformly 'greening,' local ecosystems are experiencing varied impacts from climate change, including shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns. The article highlights broader climate-related events such as heatwaves in Europe and the upcoming El Nino phenomenon, emphasizing the urgent need for global action against climate change. Australia's role in this effort is described as mixed, with the country being both a significant exporter of fossil fuels and making progress in decoupling emissions from economic growth.

Bias read (Center): The article presents scientific findings and discusses global climate change implications without overtly favoring one political perspective. It mentions both challenges and progress in addressing climate change, including Australia's mixed performance, and does not exhibit clear bias toward either褒

Why factuality (55): The article discusses the spread of grass in Antarctica as an indicator of climate change, citing specific examples like wildfires on Amsterdam Island and Bird Island. However, it does not reference the primary source document about AI and fossil fuels, nor does it connect the topic to broader energ

Why objectivity (60): The tone is alarmist, using phrases like 'ominous sign' and 'live option,' which convey concern rather than neutrality. While the article presents findings from researchers, it frames the issue in a way that emphasizes urgency and potential ecological disruption, which could be seen as emotionally c

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories