ON
← Back to feed
After ‘testing ground’ in Kashmir, pellet guns used on student protesters in India's capital
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive7 days ago

After ‘testing ground’ in Kashmir, pellet guns used on student protesters in India's capital

Indian security forces reportedly used pellet guns—devices firing hundreds of metal projectiles—on student protesters and journalists during demonstrations in New Delhi on 20 July. The protests, centered around Jantar Mantar, demanded educational reforms and the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, linked to controversies surrounding the NEET entrance exam. Medical reports indicate injuries consistent with pellet exposure among those present. While Delhi police denied using such weapons, the Rapid Action Force (RAF) acknowledged excessive force following an internal review. This marks the first recorded use of pellet guns in Delhi, though they have previously been employed in Indian-administered Kashmir. Human Rights Watch and other groups have condemned the tactics, citing excessive force and restrictions on communication.

Indian forces used pellet guns against student protesters in New Delhi on 20 July, according to medical reports from a city hospital, marking the first known instance of such tactics being employed in the capital. The attack occurred during a gathering at Jantar Mantar, a central location in Delhi, where demonstrators had been demanding educational reforms and the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The use of pellet guns, pump-action devices capable of firing hundreds of metal projectiles, has drawn condemnation from human rights organizations, which accuse authorities of employing excessive force. The protests, initially sparked by a satirical social media campaign known as the "Cockroach Janta Party" (CJP), began in June in response to remarks by Chief Justice Surya Kant, who referred to unemployed youth as "cockroaches." This led to widespread outrage and calls for systemic change. Protesters demanded the resignation of Pradhan, citing corruption and disparities in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an examination that has been linked to numerous student suicides. The movement gained momentum when activist Sonam Wangchuck embarked on a 26-day hunger strike in Jantar Mantar, drawing thousands into the streets and culminating in a large-scale march toward Parliament. On 20 July, as tensions escalated, Delhi police and the Rapid Action Force (RAF) reportedly used pellet guns and other methods, including electric shock batons, tear gas, and internet blackouts, to suppress the demonstration. Medical records from Safdarjung Hospital indicate that a journalist suffered injuries consistent with pellet strikes, having been treated by multiple departments within the hospital. These findings have fueled calls for independent investigations into the use of force by law enforcement. Delhi police have denied allegations of pellet gun use, describing them as "completely false and misleading," while the RAF acknowledged an "excessive use of force" following an internal review. To date, at least three individuals have been identified as victims of pellet gun attacks, though official statements remain inconsistent. The tactic, previously associated with operations in Indian-administered Kashmir, has been condemned by international bodies, including the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, which labeled pellet guns among the most hazardous tools used against protesters. The protests have since evolved beyond their original focus on educational reform, with participants increasingly demanding greater government accountability and even the resignation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In response, authorities have taken measures to curb dissent, including detaining activists and raiding homes. For example, Muslim volunteer Mohd Junaid faced house raids and had family members arrested by Uttar Pradesh state police. Meanwhile, Hindu nationalist groups have issued public threats against protesters, warning of potential violence. The situation underscores the deepening political unrest in India, with demonstrations reflecting growing frustration over governance and social inequality. As the protests continue, the role of law enforcement and the broader implications of the tactics used will likely remain under scrutiny. The use of pellet guns in Delhi represents a shift in how authorities manage civil disobedience, raising concerns about the safety of participants and the legitimacy of the state's response. The outcome of this conflict will depend on how these issues are addressed moving forward.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

BBC News (World) logoBBC News (World)State / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 558 days ago
India cockroach protests: Videos show officers firing 'pellet guns'

In Delhi, thousands of people participated in the cockroach protests, demanding educational reforms and the resignation of a government minister. BBC Verify analyzed videos showing security officers using pellet guns against protesters. The Central Reserve Police Force did not comment on the incidents, stating it was premature to respond and that they were investigating the situation.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the protests and the police response without overtly favoring any political side. It includes quotes from the Central Reserve Police Force indicating their stance while avoiding explicit ideological framing. The focus remains on the event itself rather

Why factuality (60): The article accurately describes the use of pellet guns based on videos, which is not explicitly stated in the primary source. While it references BBC Verify analyzing videos, it lacks specific details about the extent of injuries or verification methods. It also omits mention of the internet shutdo

Why objectivity (55): The article leans toward presenting the pellet gun incidents as credible, especially given the visuals, but does not adequately address the police's denial or provide context about the broader protest demands. The focus on visual evidence may give a skewed perspective without balancing the official

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentProgressiveFactual 55Objective 607 days ago
After ‘testing ground’ in Kashmir, pellet guns used on student protesters in India's capital

Indian security forces reportedly used pellet guns—devices firing hundreds of metal projectiles—on student protesters and journalists during demonstrations in New Delhi on 20 July. The protests, centered around Jantar Mantar, demanded educational reforms and the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, linked to controversies surrounding the NEET entrance exam. Medical reports indicate injuries consistent with pellet exposure among those present. While Delhi police denied using such weapons, the Rapid Action Force (RAF) acknowledged excessive force following an internal review. This marks the first recorded use of pellet guns in Delhi, though they have previously been employed in Indian-administered Kashmir. Human Rights Watch and other groups have condemned the tactics, citing excessive force and restrictions on communication.

Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes the use of excessive force by state actors against peaceful protesters, highlights human rights concerns raised by organizations like Human Rights Watch, and frames the protests as legitimate responses to systemic issues such as corruption and inequality in education. It cites

Why factuality (55): The article mentions pellet guns, which are not covered in the primary source document. It references hospital reports and quotes Human Rights Watch, but does not align with the primary source's description of tear gas and batons. The article also introduces new information about pellet gun use in K

Why objectivity (60): The tone remains relatively neutral, focusing on reporting what is observed in videos and quoting sources. However, the article presents the pellet gun issue as a significant development without clearly distinguishing between different accounts or providing balance on the police denial. This slightl

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories