ON
← Back to feed
'After Israel's annihilation of Gaza, can I ever return home?' Opinion by Bahzad al Akhras
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

'After Israel's annihilation of Gaza, can I ever return home?' Opinion by Bahzad al Akhras

The article is an opinion piece by Bahzad al Akhras reflecting on his experience as a Gazan student studying in the UK and his emotional connection to Gaza. He recalls a conversation with an academic supervisor who described 'home' as a privilege, prompting him to reconsider the concept of home and its role in personal identity. Al Akhras discusses how he initially viewed home as something universal and unthreatened, but after leaving Gaza nearly a year ago, he began to question whether home could be destroyed both physically and psychologically. He describes feeling homesick while abroad but maintaining a belief that Gaza remained intact in his mind, allowing him to adapt to a new environment while still envisioning a return. The piece ends with a rhetorical question about whether he can ever return home after the recent Israeli military actions in Gaza.

Bahzad al Akhras, a Palestinian scholar currently studying for his PhD in the United Kingdom, reflects on the psychological and emotional impact of losing his home in Gaza following the Israeli military operation that devastated much of the territory. His piece, published by the Middle East Eye, explores how the concept of ‘home’ has transformed from a tangible place into something intangible, something that can no longer be reclaimed. Al Akhras recalls a routine online meeting with academic supervisors during the summer, where one of them shared personal reflections on returning home after a visit to her homeland. She described the comfort of family, the familiarity of surroundings, and the quiet sense of belonging that comes with returning to one’s roots. Her words, “The privilege of home”, left a lasting impression on him, prompting introspection about the nature of home itself. Until recently, he had viewed home as something ordinary, something that everyone possessed. But after leaving Gaza nearly a year ago, those words took on new significance, forcing him to grapple with profound questions: What defines home? Can it be destroyed not only physically, but also psychologically? And what happens when there is no place to return to? His perspective shifted dramatically upon arriving in the UK in 2019 to pursue a master’s degree. Like many international students, he felt homesick, missing the sounds of Gaza, the rhythm of daily life, and the presence of family. Yet, despite these feelings, he maintained a sense of certainty: Gaza remained untouched, and so did his connection to it. He believed that once his studies were complete, he would return. This belief shaped his experiences abroad, allowing him to adapt to a new environment while maintaining a clear sense of where he belonged. That certainty shattered in February 2024, when his family home was destroyed during Israel’s military campaign. The loss was not merely of property, it was the erasure of a place that embodied his childhood, his family’s history, and his personal identity. Home ceased to be a destination he could return to; instead, it became a memory, a fragment of a past that could never be fully restored. Upon returning to the UK as a PhD student after being evacuated from Gaza, Al Akhras found himself in a situation eerily similar to his initial arrival. The physical journey mirrored that of five years earlier, yet the psychological experience was vastly different. Where once he had been temporarily away from home, he now faced permanent separation. Even if he one day returns to Gaza, he wonders: what will he be coming back to? This question haunts him throughout his academic work, overshadowing the usual optimism associated with nearing completion of a doctorate. For many students, graduation represents a hopeful transition, a step toward a clearer future. For Al Akhras, however, the prospect feels uncertain. As he nears the end of his studies, the question of where he belongs becomes increasingly urgent. The assumption that life continues in a familiar place, a home, known streets, a community that recognizes you, is no longer valid for him. The idea of returning to a place that once felt like home now seems impossible. In a world where returning home is often framed as a simple act of nostalgia or cultural continuity, Al Akhras’s experience highlights the complexity of displacement. His story underscores the emotional toll of losing not just a physical space, but a sense of self. As he navigates his academic path, the absence of a stable home continues to shape his journey, challenging the very notion of belonging itself.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 30yesterday
'After Israel's annihilation of Gaza, can I ever return home?' Opinion by Bahzad al Akhras

The article is an opinion piece by Bahzad al Akhras reflecting on his experience as a Gazan student studying in the UK and his emotional connection to Gaza. He recalls a conversation with an academic supervisor who described 'home' as a privilege, prompting him to reconsider the concept of home and its role in personal identity. Al Akhras discusses how he initially viewed home as something universal and unthreatened, but after leaving Gaza nearly a year ago, he began to question whether home could be destroyed both physically and psychologically. He describes feeling homesick while abroad but maintaining a belief that Gaza remained intact in his mind, allowing him to adapt to a new environment while still envisioning a return. The piece ends with a rhetorical question about whether he can ever return home after the recent Israeli military actions in Gaza.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the destruction of Gaza and the psychological impact of displacement as a deeply personal and politically sensitive issue. While it does not explicitly criticize specific policies or governments, the emphasis on the loss of home and the trauma of displacement aligns with left-wing

Why factuality (50): The article discusses the author's personal experience and reflections on the concept of home after leaving Gaza, but it does not address the secure base concept described in the primary source document. There is no mention of Bowlby, attachment theory, or the psychological functions of secure base

Why objectivity (30): The article presents a highly emotional and subjective perspective on displacement and loss, using phrases such as 'annihilation of Gaza' and 'can I ever return home.' These expressions convey strong emotional weight and a clear stance on the situation in Gaza, lacking neutrality or balanced present

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 30yesterday
After Israel's annihilation of Gaza, can I ever return home?

The article is a personal reflection on the concept of 'home' following the destruction of the author's family home in Gaza during Israel's military operations. The author, a Palestinian student studying abroad, contrasts their initial perception of home as a universal right with the reality of displacement and loss. They describe the emotional impact of losing their home, which symbolized family history and identity, and contrast this with their previous experiences of temporary absence while pursuing education. The piece highlights the psychological trauma of displacement and the existential uncertainty of returning to a place that no longer exists in its former form.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the destruction of Gaza as a result of Israeli actions ('genocide') and emphasizes the psychological and existential loss experienced by Palestinians. While the author does not explicitly call for political action, the narrative aligns with Palestinian perspectives on displacement

Why factuality (50): Like item 0, this article focuses on the author's personal narrative regarding home and displacement following their departure from Gaza. It contains no reference to the secure base concept, Bowlby's work, or any elements of attachment theory outlined in the primary source document. The content is c

Why objectivity (30): The article maintains a strongly biased and emotionally charged tone, using terms like 'annihilation of Gaza' and posing rhetorical questions that imply a specific viewpoint on the conflict. It lacks neutrality and presents a one-sided account of the author's experiences and feelings.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories