ON
← Back to feed
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's appeal
IS🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

US Supreme Court rejects Trump's appeal

The US Supreme Court has rejected former President Donald Trump's appeal against a ruling that found him liable for defamation and sexual harassment claims by journalist E. Jean Carroll. In 2023, Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $5 million, equivalent to approximately 650 million Icelandic krona, in damages. The lower court had upheld a verdict based on a New York state law against defamatory speech, which Trump challenged by appealing to the Supreme Court. The decision marks a significant setback for Trump, who had previously claimed the ruling was unjust. Carroll’s lawyer stated the Supreme Court’s decision affirmed the lower court’s finding that Trump had harassed and defamed her. Despite Trump being found liable for defamation and sexual harassment, the court dismissed his claim for additional punitive damages under New York’s harassment laws.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Vísir logoVísirIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 907 days ago
US Supreme Court rejects Trump's appeal

The US Supreme Court has rejected former President Donald Trump's appeal against a ruling that found him liable for defamation and sexual harassment claims by journalist E. Jean Carroll. In 2023, Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $5 million, equivalent to approximately 650 million Icelandic krona, in damages. The lower court had upheld a verdict based on a New York state law against defamatory speech, which Trump challenged by appealing to the Supreme Court. The decision marks a significant setback for Trump, who had previously claimed the ruling was unjust. Carroll’s lawyer stated the Supreme Court’s decision affirmed the lower court’s finding that Trump had harassed and defamed her. Despite Trump being found liable for defamation and sexual harassment, the court dismissed his claim for additional punitive damages under New York’s harassment laws.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and outcomes objectively, focusing on the judicial process and the implications of the ruling without overtly favoring either side. While the subject involves a prominent political figure, the framing remains balanced, emphasizing the legal arguments and判决,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Highly accurate with minor translation nuances, aligns closely with BBC. Slightly more emotive in quoting Carroll's lawyer but remains mostly neutral.

Morgunblaðið / mbl.is logoMorgunblaðið / mbl.isIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 857 days ago
Trump's sexual misconduct appeal denied

The Supreme Court of the United States has rejected Donald Trump's appeal in the case where he was found guilty of sexual assault and defamation against journalist and author E. Jean Carroll. In 2023, Trump was sentenced to pay Carroll $5 million (approximately 650 million Icelandic kronas) in a civil lawsuit she brought against him. The appellate court confirmed the verdict after the trial. The Supreme Court did not provide reasons for rejecting Trump's appeal.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal outcome neutrally, without apparent bias toward either side. It reports the rejection of Trump's appeal and provides factual background on the case without using loaded language or emphasizing one perspective over another.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Accurate overall but lacks some details from BBC like Trump's response on Truth Social. Slightly less balanced due to headline emphasis on 'hafnað' without full context.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories