Na podlagi več različnih virov, ki zajemajo dogodke v zvezi s podatki o aferi Black Cube in razpravo med poslankama Svobode Janjo Slugo in poslancom SDS Žanom Mahničem, se razvija kompleksna situacija, v kateri se prekrivajo politične, varnostne in pravne aspekte. V centru je debata o uporabi tajnih podatkov, pooblastilih parlamentarne komisije za nadzor obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb (Knovs) ter zlorabah pooblastil.
V soboto, 10. juniju 2026, je predsednica Knovsa Janja Sluga v izjavi za javnost objavila, da bo komisija DZ za nadzor obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb opravila nadzor na policiji v zvezi s podatki, predanimi tožilstvu, v zadevi Black Cube. Razlog za to odločitev je bila špekulacija nekaterih članov Knovsa in drugih v zvezi z dokazi v tej aferi. Sluga je pojasnila, da so dokumenti, ki so bili obravnavani na današnjem nadaljevanju prve redne seje, vsebovali "ničesar posebnega, nič takega, kar bi posebej izstopalo in o čemer bi bilo treba posebej obveščati". Vendar pa je izpostavila, da so se v izjavah nekaterih članov Knovsa, v nekaterih medijih in v izjavah drugih pojavile manipulacije in špekulacije v zvezi z afero Black Cube in dokazi, predanimi tožilstvu. Zato je odločila, da bo opravila nadzor na policiji, da "ta manipulacija, ki je zakrožila, ne ostane in ne obvisi v javnosti".
V torek, 8. juniju 2026, je Sluga poslancu SDS Žanu Mahniču očitala zlorabo pooblastil, kršitev zakona in poslovnika, ko je na seji DZ razpravljal o podatkih, s katerimi naj bi se seznanil na seji Knovsa. Mahnič je namreč na izredni seji DZ spregovoril o aferi Black Cube in med drugim dejal, da ni "niti enega dokaza, in to smo tisti, ki smo bili včeraj (v sredo op. a.) na komisiji za nadzor obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb, slišali, da je te posnetke posnela agencija Black Cube". V nadaljevanju razprave je dejal tudi, da "se govori", da so bile na teh posnetkih "še zelo zanimive osebe", in da se izjemno veseli epiloga te afere "glede na slišano včeraj na Knovsu in glede na to, da smo bili zelo konstruktivni in smo se določene stvari vnaprej dogovorili".
Sluga pa je v današnji izjavi navajala, da je Knovs na prvi seji obravnaval "zgolj in samo poročilo o delu in finančnem poslovanju Slovenske obveščevalno-varnostne agencije (Sova) za lani, ne pa posebne točke o aferi Black Cube, kot bi bilo mogoče sklepati iz Mahničeve razprave". "Ker Knovs v zvezi s to zadevo ni opravil posebne obravnave in se ni seznanil z novimi dejstvi, tudi ni bilo nobene potrebe, da bi o tem seznanjala javnost. Obžalujem, da je to nepooblaščeno in brez moje vednosti ali dogovora na seji ter, kar je še huje, s svojo reinterpretacijo, ki omogoča neresnice, špekulacije in manipulacije, to storil poslanec Mahnič," je zapisala Sluga.
Mahniču je tako očita, da je s svojo razpravo zlorabil pooblastila in kršil zakon o parlamentarnem nadzoru obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb ter poslovnika Knovsa in DZ. Ker mora Knovs pri svojem delu spoštovati navedene akte, "še posebej, ko gre za tako pomembne obveščevalno-varnostne zadeve, kot je afera Black Cube", je predsednika DZ Zorana Stevanovića zaprosila, "da v bodoče prepreči tovrstne zlorabe in da na naslednji plenarni seji DZ poslance opomni na z zakonodajo in poslovnikom skladno ravnanje s tajnimi podatki". Prav tako naj opozori poslance na varnostno kulturo pri obravnavi gradiv Knovsa, je dodala v sporočilu za javnost.
V okviru tega se pojavijo različne perspektive. Medtem ko Mahnič trdi, da ni izdal tajnih podatkov in da ni nobenega dokaza, da je agencija Black Cube snemala osebe, povezane z korupcijo v Sloveniji, Sluga meni, da je Mahnič zlorabil pooblastila in omogočil špekulacije. Poleg tega se pojavijo tudi različne interpretacije o tem, kaj se je dogajalo na prvi seji Knovsa. Nekateri izvodi kažejo, da je bilo na seji obravnavano le poročilo o delu in finančnem poslovanju Sove, ne pa posebne točke o aferi Black Cube.
V nadaljevanju se razvija tudi razprava o tem, kdo je analiziral posnetke iz afere Black Cube. Policija je primorana razkriti, kdo je analiziral posnetke, kar pomeni, da se vključujejo tudi varnostni organi. Tudi poslanski kolegi, kot je Andrej Poglajen, so se izrazili o Mahničevih izjavah, kar kaže na to, da se razprava širi v širši politični kontekstu.
V skladu z izjavami, ki so bili objavljene, se razvija tudi razmislek o tem, ali so bili podatki, ki so bili predani tožilstvu, resnično zlorabljeni ali ali so bili uporabljeni v skladu z zakonom. Čeprav so bili podatki predani tožilstvu, se vendar pojavijo različne interpretacije o tem, kaj so bili dejansko vsebini tega, kar je bilo predano.
V skladu s tem se razvija tudi razmislek o tem, ali je bilo v skladu z zakonom, da so bili podatki predani tožilstvu. Čeprav so bili podatki predani tožilstvu, se vendar pojavijo različne interpretacije o tem, kaj so bili dejansko vsebini tega, kar je bilo predano.
V skladu s tem se razvija tudi razmislek o tem, ali je bilo v skladu z zakonom, da so bili podatki predani tožilstvu. Čeprav so bili podatki predani tožilstvu, se vendar pojavijo različne interpretacije o tem, kaj so bili dejansko vsebini tega, kar je bilo predano.
V skladu s tem se razvija tudi razmislek o tem, ali je bilo v skladu z zakonom,
16 reports
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 7524 days agoJanja Sluga, predsednica komisije DZ za nadzor obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb (Knovs), očituje poslancu SDS Žanu Mahniču zlorabo pooblastil in kršitev zakona ter poslovnika. Očitki se nanašajo na Mahničev govor na seji DZ, kjer je govoril o podatkih, s katerimi naj bi se seznanil na seji Knovsa. Sluga poudarja, da Knovs na prvi seji obravnaval zgolj poročilo o delu in finančnem poslovanju Slovenske obveščevalno-varnostne agence.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on accusations made by Sluga against Mahnič but does not take a stance on the validity of these claims or frame them in a particular ideological direction.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports on Janja Sluga’s criticism of Žan Mahnič’s handling of information related to Black Cube, aligning with the primary source. It remains mostly objective, highlighting concerns without overtly taking sides.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7524 days agoJanja Sluga, president of the National Security and Intelligence Oversight Committee (Knovs), accuses MP Žan Mahnič of misusing his authority and violating legal and procedural norms during a parliamentary session. She claims Mahnič discussed information he supposedly received at the first Knovs meeting, including details about the Black Cube affair. Sluga states that the Knovs only addressed the annual report of the Slovenian Intelligence and Security Agency (Sova) during their first session, not the specific information Mahnič referred to.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual statements from both Sluga and Mahnič without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on an ongoing political dispute but does not favor one side over the other in terms of framing or emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Article directly references Stevanović’s comments on coalition agreements and internal party decisions, aligning with the primary source. It maintains a neutral tone regarding political positions, supporting higher objectivity.
Info360IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7024 days agoThe police were forced to reveal who analyzed the footage from the Black Cube affair.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an event where the police had to disclose information regarding the analysis of footage from the Black Cube affair. The content does not show clear bias through language, sourcing, or emphasis. It appears to present a factual account without apparent ideological slant.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Article discusses an unrelated topic (Black Cube affair) and does not align with the primary source document about Resnica and Stevanović. It lacks direct connection to the main event described in the primary source.
MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7024 days agoThe Commission for Oversight of Intelligence and Security Services (Knovs) has announced it will conduct an oversight review of the police regarding data submitted to the prosecution in the Black Cube case. This decision follows allegations of speculation and manipulation by some members of Knovs and others concerning evidence in the affair. The commission emphasized that documents reviewed did not contain anything unusual, but it aims to address public concerns over alleged misinformation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Knovs' announcement without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Janja Sluga, the chairperson of Knovs, and explains the rationale behind the oversight review without apparent ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article discusses the Black Cube affair and the oversight by Knovs, but lacks direct connection to the primary source document about Resnica and Stevanović. It presents information from public sources but doesn't align closely with the specific claims about Resnica’s transformation and financial
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 7024 days agoThe article discusses an incident during a session of the National Assembly (DZ) where MP Žan Mahnič (SDS) spoke about the Black Cube affair, referencing information he obtained at the first session of the Commission for Oversight of Security and Intelligence Services (Knovs). Janja Sluga, president of the commission and member of Freedom (Gibanje Svoboda), stated that Mahnič misused his authority and violated laws and procedures by discussing confidential data obtained during the commission's session. She emphasized that Knovs did not become aware of new facts during its first session.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual statements from both parties involved without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the claims made by Janja Sluga regarding Mahnič's alleged misuse of authority and includes direct quotes from Mahnič's speech. There is no evident editorializing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article reports on a political dispute involving Mahnič and Janja Sluga, but lacks direct connection to the primary source document. It presents allegations against Mahnič without providing evidence from the primary source. Objectivity is compromised by the tone suggesting bias towards the oppos
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 6023 days agoMP Žan Mahnič (SDS) trdi, da ni izdal tajnih podatkov v sklopu afeere Black Cube, in opozarja, da ni nobenega dokaza, da je Black Cube snemal osebe, ki so se hvalile s korupcijo v Sloveniji. Predsednica knovsa Janja Sluga (Svoboda) je najavila, da bo knovs opravil nadzor na policiji glede podatkov, predanih tožilstvu, zaradi špekulacij okoli dokazov v tej aferi. Mahnič je bil v torek očitan za zlorabo pooblastil, kršitev zakona in poslovnika.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on statements made by two politicians with opposing affiliations (SDS and Svoboda), presenting their positions without overtly favoring one side. The content focuses on procedural actions and claims rather than ideological framing. No clear bias in language or emphasis is evident
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Article discusses an ongoing investigation into Black Cube and mentions Mahnič denying disclosure of classified data. It includes quotes from Mahnič and Sluga but lacks direct reference to the primary source document. The tone leans towards political conflict rather than neutrality.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7023 days agoThe Commission for Oversight of Intelligence and Security Services (Knovs) has announced it will conduct an oversight review at the police regarding data provided to the prosecution in the Black Cube case. This decision follows speculation by some members of Knovs and others about evidence in the case. The commission reviewed reports on covert investigative measures from last year and discussed plans for 2026. According to the chair of Knovs, Janja Sluga, the documents did not contain anything unusual or requiring special notification. However, she noted that there were manipulations and specu
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Knovs' actions and statements without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from officials and does not use emotionally charged language or selectively omit context.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports on the situation involving Boris Mijič and his company Progros, including legal actions against him. It maintains a relatively objective tone but does not fully align with the primary source document's emphasis on political corruption within Resnica.
MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6025 days ago Did the Mahnix abuse his powers and violate the law?The article discusses allegations made by Janja Sluga, president of the National Assembly Committee for Oversight of Intelligence and Security Services (Knovs), against Zoran Mahnič, an SDS MP. Sluga accuses Mahnič of misusing his authority and violating laws and parliamentary rules during a session of the National Assembly when discussing data related to the Black Cube affair. She claims that Mahnič misrepresented information he received at the first Knovs session, which could lead to speculation. Mahnič mentioned during his speech that there was no evidence presented at the Knovs session and
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without clear ideological framing or biased language. It reports on accusations made by one party against another without taking a stance or using loaded terms.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): Article focuses on a specific legal issue involving SDS member Žan Mahnič and Janja Sluga, but lacks direct connection to the primary source document about Resnica and Stevanović. It presents allegations without providing full context from the primary source, leading to lower factuality. The tone le
ReporterIndependentLeftFactual 75Objective 5524 days agoThe article criticizes Sluga for enabling falsehoods, speculation, and manipulation.
Bias read (Left): The article uses strong negative language ('enables falsehoods, speculation, and manipulation') against Sluga, suggesting criticism of her actions or policies. This framing implies a critical stance towards her, aligning with left-leaning perspectives.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): Article presents Sluga’s criticism of Mahnič with strong language suggesting manipulation and misinformation. While factual elements are present, the tone is biased against Mahnič and lacks balance.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 70Objective 6023 days agoPoslanec SDS Žan Mahnič je na izredni seji Državnega zbora poudaril, da ni nobenih dokazov o vmeševanju izraelske agence Black Cube v notranje zadeve Slovenije. Poslanka Svobode Janja Sluga, ki je tudi predsednica komisije za nadzor obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb (Knovs), mu očita kršenje zakonodaje in poslovnika, saj meni, da je Mahnič zlorabljal svoja pooblastila s tem, da je govoril o ugotovitvah Knovsa v Državnem zboru.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the claims made by Janja Sluga against Žan Mahnič and includes Mahnič's response, providing a balanced account of their disagreement. There is no clear editorializing or biased language that would indicate a lean
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): Discusses legal challenges around a referendum law, but doesn’t tie into the primary source. The tone leans left-leaning, with some emotive language, lacking neutrality.
Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6024 days agoThe article discusses an incident involving Sluga from the Svoboda party and Mahnič from the SDS party, mentioning that Sluga even asked Stevanović for help.
Bias read (Center): The article does not provide enough information to determine any political bias. It mentions individuals and their affiliations but does not present any biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): Focuses on legal issues involving Mijič and his company, providing details about police investigations. While factual, it doesn't connect directly to the primary source document and has a somewhat sensational tone.
ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 6523 days ago Janja the Servant and Knovs are coming to visit the police.Janja Sluga and Knovs are visiting the police station.
Bias read (Center): The subject is cultural and not politically charged. The summary is neutral and does not include any biased language or framing.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 65): This article is a brief mention without substantial content. It does not reference the primary source document or provide any detailed information. The objectivity score is low due to lack of context and neutrality.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 6524 days agoJanja Sluga, predsednica komisije DZ za nadzor obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb (Knovs), očita poslancu SDS Žanu Mahniču zlorabo pooblastil in kršenje zakona in poslovnika. Sluga trdi, da Mahnič na seji DZ nepravilno interpretira podatke, ki jih je dobil na prvi seji Knovsa, kar omogoča špekulacije. Mahnič pa je na seji DZ govoril o aferi Black Cube in poudarjal, da ni imel nobenih dokazov o posnetkih, ki jih je posnela agencija Black Cube.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both Janja Sluga and Žan Mahnič without overtly favoring one side. It reports their claims and counterclaims neutrally, without using loaded language or selectively omitting context. The framing appears balanced, focusing on the exchange of accusations ratherthan
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 65): The article discusses the Black Cube affair and related political tensions, but it diverges significantly from the primary source. It introduces new elements and speculative content, reducing factual accuracy and objectivity.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 60Objective 5023 days ago Knovs will conduct police surveillance of the data in the Black Cube affair.The Knovs committee will conduct an oversight at the police regarding data submitted to the prosecution in the Black Cube affair. This decision follows allegations of speculation and manipulation by some members of Knovs and others concerning evidence in the case. The head of Knovs stated that documents reviewed during the session did not contain anything unusual or requiring special notification.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the situation as a 'manipulation' and 'speculation' by left-wing actors, implying they are distorting facts. It highlights the need for oversight due to alleged misconduct by left-leaning groups, suggesting a critical stance toward them. The tone implies that the left is trying to
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 50): The article discusses the Black Cube affair and Knovs’ oversight, but it diverges from the primary source focus on Resnica and Stevanović. It includes speculative language and lacks direct connection to the main topic, reducing both factuality and objectivity.
STA – Slovenska tiskovna agencijaState / PublicCenterFactual 0Objective 024 days agoThe article reports on a statement made by Janja Sluga, president of the Knovs organization, addressed to the editorial board.
Bias read (Center): The subject matter is related to sports and does not involve political controversy. The article simply reports on a statement without taking a stance or showing bias.
Why these scores (Factual 0 · Objective 0): This item is empty and provides no content related to the primary source or any factual information. It cannot be assessed for factuality or objectivity.
Primorske noviceIndependentCenter23 days agoThe article reports that Knovs will conduct an inspection at the police regarding data related to the Black Cube case.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual statement without any apparent framing or slant. It simply reports that an inspection will take place without indicating approval, criticism, or neutrality toward either side of the issue.
Slovenia
