The article discusses the actions of AfD MP Matthias Helferich, who criticizes postcolonial research and promotes a campaign against 'post-colonialism' by labeling it as a 'left-wing cultural battle' that falsely attributes a 'white guilt.' Helferich claims that this narrative seeks to distort historical accounts of colonialism and national socialism, aiming to present a negative image of Germany’s history. His campaign includes a website and brochure that attempt to counter what he calls the 'schuldstolz' (debt pride) of Europe, but critics like Berit Kö point out that the materials contain inaccuracies, such as misrepresenting the origins of activists and using racially charged imagery. The article highlights concerns over the distortion of historical narratives and the potential for misinformation in political discourse.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the AfD's critique of postcolonial research as a legitimate challenge to 'left-wing cultural battles,' while emphasizing the party's stance against what it perceives as biased historical narratives. It uses terms like 'white guilt' and 'schuldstolz' to cast doubt on the legitimacy






