ON
← Back to feed
ADC sues DHS Secretary Mullin over illegal CBP seizure of Max Blumenthal’s devices
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressive7/16/2026

ADC sues DHS Secretary Mullin over illegal CBP seizure of Max Blumenthal’s devices

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) has filed a legal motion in the Eastern District of Virginia, representing journalist Max Blumenthal, who claims his smartphones were illegally seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) upon his return from Iran. The motion argues that the warrantless seizure violates the First and Fourth Amendments, as well as the Privacy Protection Act, and requests the immediate return of the devices and any data extracted from them. Blumenthal was detained for about two and a half hours during which CBP officers questioned him extensively about his journalism and funding sources. He refused to provide his phone passcodes, citing potential risks to his sources and privacy. The motion highlights inconsistencies in CBP's actions, noting that his laptop and camera were not searched, despite claims of looking for criminal activity or child sexual material. Additionally, the filing points out that questions posed to Blumenthal aligned with those raised by Trump supporter Laura Loomer prior to his return, suggesting possible targeting due to his political views and journalistic activities.

1 reports

The Grayzone logoThe GrayzoneIndependentProgressive7/16/2026
ADC sues DHS Secretary Mullin over illegal CBP seizure of Max Blumenthal’s devices

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) has filed a legal motion in the Eastern District of Virginia, representing journalist Max Blumenthal, who claims his smartphones were illegally seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) upon his return from Iran. The motion argues that the warrantless seizure violates the First and Fourth Amendments, as well as the Privacy Protection Act, and requests the immediate return of the devices and any data extracted from them. Blumenthal was detained for about two and a half hours during which CBP officers questioned him extensively about his journalism and funding sources. He refused to provide his phone passcodes, citing potential risks to his sources and privacy. The motion highlights inconsistencies in CBP's actions, noting that his laptop and camera were not searched, despite claims of looking for criminal activity or child sexual material. Additionally, the filing points out that questions posed to Blumenthal aligned with those raised by Trump supporter Laura Loomer prior to his return, suggesting possible targeting due to his political views and journalistic activities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as an unconstitutional violation of civil liberties, emphasizing the protection of journalists' rights and highlighting potential political motivations behind the CBP's actions. The tone criticizes the government agency's conduct and aligns with perspectives that view

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories