The ongoing impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has taken another significant turn as her legal team expressed openness to having the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) box containing her tax records opened—but only in a confidential session. This development comes after the House of Representatives initially subpoenaed the documents during clarificatory hearings related to the impeachment complaint against Duterte. However, concerns about potential violations of the National Internal Revenue Code led lawmakers to refrain from opening the box publicly. Now, the focus has shifted to whether the documents can be examined in a closed-door setting, raising questions about transparency and legal procedures within the impeachment process.
According to a detailed response submitted by Duterte’s defense team on June 26, they emphasized that they were not opposed to the idea of opening the BIR box, provided that the session remained confidential. Their statement clarified that participants involved in the opening and pre-marking of the box should be strictly prohibited from disclosing any information to the public. Furthermore, the defense argued that the documents contained in the box pertained to periods when Duterte was not yet an impeachable official. They pointed to previous submissions, including their answer dated May 25, 2026, and pre-trial brief dated June 15, 2026, which highlighted that these records could not form the basis of any impeachable offense since they relate to a time before she assumed such a position.
Despite the defense’s willingness to proceed under confidentiality, the prosecution panel voiced skepticism about the necessity of holding the session in private. During a press conference on June 29, public prosecutor Leila de Lima, representing the party-list group Mamamayang Liberal, questioned why an executive session was required. She suggested that a simple assignment of a team to open the box and mark its contents would suffice. This exchange underscored the differing perspectives between the two sides regarding procedural requirements and the implications of handling sensitive financial information.
The controversy surrounding the BIR box reflects broader challenges faced by the impeachment court as it navigates the delicate balance between ensuring transparency and protecting individuals' privacy rights. The prosecution aims to use the tax records as crucial evidence to support their claim that Duterte amassed ill-gotten wealth, thereby justifying the impeachment proceedings. Meanwhile, the defense continues to challenge the relevance and admissibility of the documents, arguing that they pertain to a period when Duterte was not subject to impeachment.
As the situation unfolds, attention remains focused on the pre-trial proceedings scheduled for the upcoming days. The House has indicated that a pre-trial order for the impeachment case is expected to be issued by Monday, according to reports from the House clerk of court. This development signals an imminent phase in the legal battle, where both sides will have the opportunity to further articulate their positions and prepare for the subsequent stages of the trial.
In parallel, the prosecution has continued to strengthen its team, with recent announcements highlighting the appointment of former Surigao del Norte 2nd District representative Robert Ace Barbers as an impeachment trial adviser and spokesperson. His extensive legislative experience and involvement in past investigations into high-profile cases are seen as valuable assets to the prosecution’s efforts. Alongside Barbers, other notable figures have joined the prosecution team, including representatives and private prosecutors known for their expertise in legal matters. These additions reflect the growing complexity of the impeachment case and the commitment of the prosecution to thoroughly address the allegations against Vice President Sara Duterte.
6 reports
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8517 days ago Diokno: Filipinos eager for Duterte’s response to impeachment caseVice President Sara Duterte faces an impeachment trial over allegations including misuse of secret funds, bribery, amassing unexplained wealth, and plotting assassinations of high-profile figures. The trial, set to begin on July 6, has drawn significant public interest, with many Filipinos awaiting her response to the charges. Public prosecutor and Akbayan Representative Chel Diokno emphasized that the trial should be judged based on evidence and not political considerations, urging Senate members to remain impartial. Duterte's legal team has focused on procedural aspects of the case rather than providing a direct defense, while the prosecution works to prepare the trial's structure.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, quoting both the accused and the prosecutor, without overtly favoring either side. It emphasizes the need for impartiality in the trial and provides balanced context about the charges and the process.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Accurately reflects statements from Diokno and the allegations against Duterte. Maintains neutrality in presenting perspectives without overt bias.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 809 days ago Sara Duterte camp OK with opening BIR box, but only in confidential sessionVice President Sara Duterte's legal team has expressed willingness to open a sealed box containing her tax records before the House justice committee, but insists it must occur in a confidential executive session. They argue that the documents, which cover periods when Duterte was not an impeachable official, cannot be used as evidence of any impeachable offenses. The prosecution, however, has questioned the need for secrecy, suggesting the box could be opened publicly with appropriate safeguards. The issue arose during pre-trial proceedings of Duterte's impeachment case, with concerns over potential violations of privacy laws if the records were disclosed improperly. The debate highlights tensions between transparency and confidentiality in legal processes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the defense's position, emphasizing confidentiality and the irrelevance of past tax records to current charges, and the prosecution's counterarguments questioning the need for secrecy. It avoids overtly biased language and provides balanced quotes from both sides without明显的
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Accurately reports the defense team's position on opening the BIR box in an executive session. Factual details align with the provided text. Objectivity slightly reduced by the focus on the defense's stance without equal emphasis on the prosecution's perspective.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 87Objective 8017 days ago Lawmakers: Filipinos await Sara Duterte reply to chargesFilipino lawmakers are urging Vice President Sara Duterte to publicly address the impeachment charges brought against her by the House of Representatives. The charges include allegations of corruption, misuse of public funds, constitutional violations, and threats against high-profile figures. The impeachment process has moved to the Senate, where the trial is expected to begin on July 6. While Duterte's legal team has denied the allegations, she has not yet directly responded to them. Lawmakers argue that her personal appearance during the trial would allow her to defend herself and potentially strengthen her support base.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, quoting multiple lawmakers and outlining the charges and procedural steps without overtly favoring any side. It does not use biased language or selectively omit perspectives.
Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 80): Accurate information on Escudero's potential role. Objectivity is slightly skewed by the critical stance towards his credibility.
GMA News OnlineIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 9013 days ago Pre-trial order for Sara Duterte impeachment case out by Monday — BantugThe article reports that a pre-trial order for the impeachment case against Sara Duterte is expected to be issued by Monday. The information comes from Bantug, a local news outlet affiliated with GMA Network. The focus is on the legal proceedings related to the potential impeachment of Sara Duterte, who is the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte and currently serves as the mayor of Davao City. The article highlights the anticipated timeline for the issuance of the pre-trial order, indicating that the process is moving forward.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the legal process surrounding the impeachment case against Sara Duterte without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It focuses on the procedural aspect of issuing a pre-trial order and does not provide commentary or opinion on the case
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 90): Brief and factual statement about the pre-trial order. Neutral in tone.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago Prosecution says impeachment court should not junk Sara Duterte case without trial | The wRapThe article reports on several news items. One focuses on the Philippine prosecution's opposition to the Senate impeachment court dismissing Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment case without a trial, arguing it would violate the Constitution. Another item mentions the International Criminal Court ordering the freezing of funds seized from former President Rodrigo Duterte during his arrest. Additional stories cover the Philippines leading global solar investment due to rising energy costs, potential fuel price changes due to Middle East tensions, and a temporary ceasefire between Iran and the United States.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple news items with varying degrees of political charge. While the impeachment case involving Sara Duterte is a politically charged issue, the article does not take a clear ideological stance on the matter. It provides factual reporting without evident bias toward either a左
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factuality is high as the article reports on known developments related to Sara Duterte's impeachment and international legal actions against Duterte. Objectivity is moderate as it presents political positions without overt bias but lacks depth on broader implications.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8010 days ago Ace Barbers named as prosecution’s adviser in Sara Duterte impeachment trialThe House of Representatives in the Philippines has appointed former congressman Robert Ace Barbers as an adviser and spokesperson for the prosecution team in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Barbers, known for his extensive legislative experience and leadership roles in key committees, including the quad committee that investigated allegations against former President Rodrigo Duterte, will help communicate the impeachment process to the public. The House has also expanded its prosecution team by adding four more private lawyers, bringing the total number of private prosecutors to 15. These include legal professionals with connections to notable figures such as former Senator Antonio Trillanes IV and late public works undersecretary Catalina Cabral. Lawmakers emphasized that hiring additional lawyers is part of a strategic effort to build a robust case, contrasting the prosecution's task of constructing evidence with the defense's role in challenging it.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the composition and strategy of the prosecution team in an impeachment trial without overtly favoring either side. It provides balanced reporting on the appointments and the rationale behind expanding the team, without taking a clear ideological stance. The phr
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 80): Factuality is good as it accurately describes the appointment of Ace Barbers and provides relevant background. Objectivity is strong as it remains neutral, presenting facts without emotional language or clear ideological slant.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter