The Austrian National Council held a special session where 22 members were absent, including 12 from the Freedom Party (FPÖ), representing over 20% of their delegation. This marked a notable absence compared to previous sessions, which typically saw fewer absences. The article explores whether such high absentee rates are unusual or expected, noting that four instances during the current legislative period had more than 20 absentees, all of which were special sessions. The National Council’s rules require members to attend sessions, and absences must be reported to the parliamentary leadership. The article highlights the logistical challenges of scheduling these sessions, especially around school start times in western Austria.
Former Austrian National Council President Wolfgang Sobotka (ÖVP) has commissioned artist Erwin Wurm to create his portrait for display in the Austrian Parliament. According to reports from Kurier and Krone, Sobotka granted Wurm the task of producing a portrait for the Presidents' Gallery, which is reserved for all former National Council presidents. The portrait will take the form of a photograph, with net costs amounting to €30,000. This decision comes after previous attempts to incorporate Wurm’s work into the parliamentary complex faced obstacles. Sobotka had previously sought to include Wurm’s art during renovations of the Hohen Haus at the Ring. Initially, a sculpture was planned for installation at the Ring, but this idea was vetoed by the city of Vienna. Later, Sobotka aimed to place a Wurm sculpture at the back of the parliament building along Reichsratsstraße, though this effort also failed. In October 2024, shortly before leaving office, Sobotka surprised observers by purchasing two sculptures from Wurm, each costing €120,000, according to earlier reports. These were installed inside the Parliament, specifically in the Upper Vestibule near the entrance to the colonnade hall. The acquisition proceeded without consulting a curator or seeking approval from the Presidential Office. At the time, former Parliamentary Director Harald Dossi opposed the purchase but ultimately complied with orders. Following Sobotka's departure, his successor, FPÖ National Council President Walter Rosenkranz, reversed the purchase in the previous year and returned the two sculptures to the artist. The cost of returning the sculptures was borne by the Parliamentary Directorate. Sobotka expressed outrage over this move, criticizing Rosenkranz in a press release for aligning with the populism of Herbert Kickl and selling off works by one of Austria’s most prominent artists. The commissioning of Wurm’s portrait marks a new chapter in Sobotka’s efforts to have his legacy represented within the parliamentary complex. Despite past controversies surrounding his tenure, including criticism for the acquisition of a gilded piano for the Parliament, Sobotka continues to seek recognition through artistic means. During a special session of the National Council last Monday, FPÖ National Council President Walter Rosenkranz read out a list of absent members, highlighting the absence of 22 MPs. Among them, 12 seats remained empty due to FPÖ members not attending, representing more than 20 percent of their delegation. This marked an unusual occurrence, as attendance levels typically remain stable throughout the legislative period. Only four sessions since autumn 2024 saw more than 20 absences, with three of these being special sessions. The recent special session was triggered by a Greens’ request related to the heatwave. With 183 MPs needing to adjust their schedules, some found it challenging, particularly given the start of the school year in western Austria. Nevertheless, the National Council resumed its regular operations following the summer recess, with committees beginning discussions on legislative texts and members actively engaging in the corridors of the Hohen Haus. According to the National Council’s rules of procedure, every MP is required to attend sessions of the National Council and the committees to which they belong. Any absence must be reported to the leadership, usually handled by the party group. The National Council President records such absences in the official agenda known as the Croquis. Absences are officially noted as "unavoidable," which can encompass a variety of reasons, including important local commitments. For example, FPÖ MP Maximilian Linder cited a crucial and unavoidable meeting at the municipal administration in his hometown of Afritz am See.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article discusses former Austrian National Council President Wolfgang Sobotka's efforts to commission an artwork by artist Erwin Wurm for the presidential gallery at the Austrian Parliament. Despite previous failed attempts to install sculptures, including one blocked by Vienna's veto, Sobotka succeeded in securing Wurm's portrait for the gallery. The portrait is expected to be a photograph costing around 30,000 euros. The piece follows past controversies involving Sobotka's decisions, such as the purchase of two expensive sculptures which were later reversed by his successor, FPÖ National Council President Walter Rosenkranz. Sobotka criticized this reversal as a betrayal of artistic value.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Sobotka's actions and their political implications, including criticism from both Sobotka and his successor. It does not overtly favor one political faction over another, maintaining neutrality in its framing.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Wolfgang Sobotka commissioning Erwin Wurm’s portrait for the parliamentary president gallery, citing sources like 'Kurier' and 'Krone'. It mentions costs, previous attempts at installing sculptures, and actions taken by Sobotka and his successor Rosenkranz. While these details
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts about Sobotka's actions and their consequences without overt bias. The article avoids taking sides on the political implications of the artwork or the controversies surrounding Sobotka's past decisions.
Die PresseParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 80
Former Austrian National Council President Wolfgang Sobotka (ÖVP) has managed to place a portrait of artist Erwin Wurm in the Austrian Parliament, despite previous controversies over his purchases of Wurm's sculptures. Originally, Sobotka had planned to install two of Wurm's sculptures within the Parliament building, but this was later reversed by his successor, FPÖ President Walter Rosenkranz, who returned them to the artist. The portraits now being placed in the parliamentary gallery cost around 30,000 euros, while the earlier sculptures were estimated at 271,000 euros. Sobotka criticized Rosenkranz for returning the works, accusing him of aligning with populist views.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, detailing both Sobotka's actions and Rosenkranz's subsequent reversal, along with their respective justifications and criticisms. There is no overtly biased language or selective sourcing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
Why factuality (75): This article corroborates the information from ORF News, mentioning the cost of the portraits, prior sculpture installations, and the reversal by Rosenkranz. It references 'Kurier' and provides similar details about the financial aspects and historical context. Again, while factual, it does not enga
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral stance, focusing on the sequence of events and the financial implications without expressing judgment on the political motivations behind Sobotka's decision.
The Austrian National Council held a special session where 22 members were absent, including 12 from the Freedom Party (FPÖ), representing over 20% of their delegation. This marked a notable absence compared to previous sessions, which typically saw fewer absences. The article explores whether such high absentee rates are unusual or expected, noting that four instances during the current legislative period had more than 20 absentees, all of which were special sessions. The National Council’s rules require members to attend sessions, and absences must be reported to the parliamentary leadership. The article highlights the logistical challenges of scheduling these sessions, especially around school start times in western Austria.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the high absentee rate among FPÖ members as noteworthy and emphasizes the procedural requirements for attendance, suggesting a critical view of the situation. It does not provide balanced perspectives from other parties or contextualize the issue within broader political dynamics,
Why factuality (40): This article diverges significantly from the main event discussed in the others. It focuses on parliamentary attendance issues and lists absent members, which is unrelated to the primary topic of Sobotka and Wurm. As such, it lacks alignment with the primary source document and the other articles, l
Why objectivity (60): The tone is more journalistic but leans towards commentary on the significance of absences, suggesting a potential bias toward highlighting political dysfunction. This contrasts with the neutrality expected when reporting on the same event.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Austria
