ON
← Back to feed
D4vd lawyers question DNA evidence in murder case
MX🏛️ PoliticsProgressive10 days ago

D4vd lawyers question DNA evidence in murder case

The lawyers representing rapper D4vd are challenging the DNA evidence presented by authorities in the case against him for the murder of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas. During a preliminary hearing, defense attorneys questioned police about why more DNA tests were not conducted on objects found at D4vd’s home and vehicle, which authorities claim were used in the killing. The prosecution alleges that D4vd had a sexual relationship with Rivas when she was 13 and he was 18, and that she threatened to expose him before her death. Forensic expert Lauren Wallace stated that initial tests on tools like chainsaws did not show blood, hence no DNA samples were taken. Defense attorney Blair Berk argued that if an object has someone else’s DNA, it cannot be seen immediately, suggesting possible contamination or mishandling of evidence. The prosecution also presented cell tower data indicating D4vd was at his residence on the night of the alleged murder and later traveled to a remote area where Rivas’ passport was found.

Lawyers for rapper D4vd have raised questions over DNA evidence in the murder case of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas. The legal team pressed police during a hearing on Thursday, the third day of a preliminary court session, which will determine whether there is enough cause to bring the artist to trial on charges of murder, sexual abuse of a minor, and dismemberment of a corpse. D4vd has pleaded not guilty to the allegations. His attorneys have vowed to vigorously defend his innocence. During the interrogation, defense lawyer Blair Berk focused on two chainsaws found in the singer’s garage, which prosecutors claim were used to dismember Rivas. Criminalist Lauren Wallace of the Los Angeles Police Department stated that initial tests did not show signs of blood on the tools, so no DNA samples were taken. “ If an object has someone else's DNA, you wouldn't see it at that moment,” Berk argued. Wallace responded, “No, you can’t see DNA through contact,” and reiterated that the blades tested negative for blood. Under questioning from prosecutors, Wallace admitted that analyzing DNA within the suspect’s residence would be pointless since it would be everywhere. Berk then asked, “Did you know several people lived in this residence?” Wallace confirmed, “Yes, we knew.” Earlier, Wallace had testified that she found signs of cleaned-up blood throughout the garage. A police detective also testified that cell tower data showed D4vd was at his home on April 23, 2025, the night prosecutors allege Rivas was killed. Later that evening, he traveled to a remote area of Santa Barbara County, approximately 152 kilometers away. The detective noted he made two subsequent visits to the area in May, including one to a location where a road worker discovered Rivas’s passport. Prosecutors aim to establish that D4vd began a sexual relationship with Rivas when she was 13 years old and he was 18. In a court filing, they claimed she became jealous of his relationships with other women and threatened to expose him and ruin his multi-million-dollar career the night before her death. The filing states that D4vd sent a car to pick her up on the night of April 23, 2025, and stabbed her upon her arrival at his home. According to prosecutors, the body was kept in the front trunk of his Tesla for weeks or months before being found after the vehicle was towed four and a half months later, in September. The discovery of the body led to the current investigation into D4vd’s alleged involvement in Rivas’s death. The case continues to unfold as both sides present their arguments in court.

1 reports

El Universal logoEl UniversalIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7810 days ago
D4vd lawyers question DNA evidence in murder case

The lawyers representing rapper D4vd are challenging the DNA evidence presented by authorities in the case against him for the murder of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas. During a preliminary hearing, defense attorneys questioned police about why more DNA tests were not conducted on objects found at D4vd’s home and vehicle, which authorities claim were used in the killing. The prosecution alleges that D4vd had a sexual relationship with Rivas when she was 13 and he was 18, and that she threatened to expose him before her death. Forensic expert Lauren Wallace stated that initial tests on tools like chainsaws did not show blood, hence no DNA samples were taken. Defense attorney Blair Berk argued that if an object has someone else’s DNA, it cannot be seen immediately, suggesting possible contamination or mishandling of evidence. The prosecution also presented cell tower data indicating D4vd was at his residence on the night of the alleged murder and later traveled to a remote area where Rivas’ passport was found.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the legal proceedings with emphasis on the defense's challenge to the prosecution's evidence, highlighting potential flaws in forensic procedures. While the legal battle itself is central, the narrative leans toward questioning the reliability of state-provided evidence, aligning,

Why factuality (85): The article reports on legal proceedings and expert testimony regarding DNA evidence in the case against D4vd. It accurately reflects the statements made by defense attorney Blair Berk and forensic expert Lauren Wallace during the preliminary hearing. The information aligns with typical legal report

Why objectivity (78): The article presents both sides of the argument, defense claims versus the prosecution’s position, with a relatively neutral tone. However, it leans slightly toward the defense perspective by highlighting their questioning of the forensic evidence and emphasizing the lack of DNA findings. There is som

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories