ON
← Back to feed
Abelardo De La Espriella says the talks are over: he criticizes the false total peace
CO🏛️ PoliticsConservative6 hr. ago

Abelardo De La Espriella says the talks are over: he criticizes the false total peace

In his address on Sunday night, August 30, 2026, Colombian President Abelardo De La Espriella announced the termination of peace talks with several armed groups, calling the previous 'total peace' initiative a failure that had allowed narcoterrorism to undermine national sovereignty. He stated that these negotiations lacked genuine commitment to peace, including efforts toward civilian reintegration or accountability through justice. The president issued nine resolutions ending dialogues with groups such as Calarcá, the Coordinadora Nacional Ejército Bolivariano (CNEB), Comandos de Frontera, and the Autodefensas Conquistadoras de la Sierra Nevada (ACSN). De La Espriella emphasized that he would not allow the term 'peace' to be used as a cover for impunity, declaring that the state would now enforce law and order fully across the country.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Semana logoSemanaIndependentConservative6 hr. ago
Abelardo De La Espriella says the talks are over: he criticizes the false total peace

In his address on Sunday night, August 30, 2026, Colombian President Abelardo De La Espriella announced the termination of peace talks with several armed groups, calling the previous 'total peace' initiative a failure that had allowed narcoterrorism to undermine national sovereignty. He stated that these negotiations lacked genuine commitment to peace, including efforts toward civilian reintegration or accountability through justice. The president issued nine resolutions ending dialogues with groups such as Calarcá, the Coordinadora Nacional Ejército Bolivariano (CNEB), Comandos de Frontera, and the Autodefensas Conquistadoras de la Sierra Nevada (ACSN). De La Espriella emphasized that he would not allow the term 'peace' to be used as a cover for impunity, declaring that the state would now enforce law and order fully across the country.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the termination of peace talks as a necessary step against narcoterrorism and emphasizes the use of state force to ensure law and order, reflecting a hardline stance on security and governance. The language used, such as 'narcoterrorism,' 'impunity,' and 'force legítima,' suggests

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories