ON
← Back to feed
A Yeti hunter and turtle sex crimes – inside Putin’s bizarre sham election
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive8 days ago

A Yeti hunter and turtle sex crimes – inside Putin’s bizarre sham election

Russia's Supreme Court ruled that the liberal opposition party Yabloko cannot participate in the September parliamentary elections, citing alleged foreign funding violations. This decision comes amid concerns that the elections, though heavily manipulated, serve as a facade for maintaining public legitimacy. The State Duma elections, which will take place from September 18–20, are expected to result in a victory for the ruling United Russia party, with other registered parties largely aligned with the government. Yabloko, which previously challenged the Kremlin's policies, was initially allowed to run but was later banned due to a perceived rise in online support. While the elections are widely seen as fraudulent, they still play a symbolic role in allowing limited public discourse and maintaining the illusion of democratic participation.

Bashar al-Assad, the former president of Syria, is currently serving a life sentence in a Moscow high-rise apartment, though the verdict was delivered in absentia by a tribunal in Damascus. The ruling, which condemns him for war crimes and crimes against humanity, marks the culmination of a protracted legal battle that began with his ousting from power in 2024. Despite the formal judgment, Assad's fate remains uncertain, as Russian authorities have shown no immediate intention to extradite him back to Syria for execution. His son-in-law, Ahmad al-Sharaa, the current head of the Syrian government, had requested his return for trial, but the request was denied, allowing the proceedings to proceed without him present. Assad, now 60, resides in the affluent Rublyovka district of Moscow, a neighborhood known for its elite residents and secure environments. While reports suggest he spends his time engaging in leisure activities such as playing video games and revisiting his academic interests in ophthalmology, he is constantly under surveillance. His situation reflects a broader pattern of exiled leaders seeking refuge under Russian patronage, albeit with strict conditions imposed by the Kremlin. This arrangement has been a double-edged sword for Assad, offering him safety but limiting his autonomy and ability to influence events in Syria. The Russian government's decision to withhold Assad's extradition stems from strategic considerations. Maintaining his presence in Moscow serves as a diplomatic asset, particularly in negotiations regarding the continued operation of Russian military bases in Syria. These bases, located in key cities like Tartous, remain crucial for Russia's regional influence and military posture. By keeping Assad alive, Russia ensures that he remains a potential bargaining chip should tensions escalate with Syria's new leadership or with other international actors such as Iran. However, the Kremlin's support comes at a cost. Assad is prohibited from engaging in political or media activities, effectively silencing him as a public figure. This restriction underscores the delicate balance Russia maintains between providing sanctuary and ensuring control over the actions of its protected exiles. The situation mirrors historical precedents, including the cases of Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian president, and Aslan Abashidze, the former Georgian leader, both of whom found temporary refuge in Moscow under similar circumstances. The financial implications of hosting exiled leaders are also significant. The Assad family is believed to hold substantial assets in Moscow, valued at around $40 million. While the Kremlin may tolerate this level of wealth, it is clear that the financial burden of maintaining such individuals is considerable. Security measures are paramount, as exiled leaders often face threats from former adversaries or victims of their regimes. Recent incidents involving Ukrainian agents targeting defectors highlight the risks associated with harboring former leaders. In addition to the practical concerns, the political ramifications of Assad's continued stay in Russia are complex. His presence in Moscow could complicate efforts to normalize relations with Syria and might strain ties with other countries, particularly Iran. The Iranian government, which shares cultural and religious ties with Assad's Alawite minority, is likely monitoring developments closely, aware that any shift in Assad's status could impact regional alliances. Despite the constraints placed upon him, Assad remains a symbol of the geopolitical landscape shaped by Russia's interventions in the Middle East. His case illustrates the intricate web of alliances, rivalries, and strategic calculations that define contemporary international relations. As the situation evolves, the interplay between personal survival, political leverage, and national interests will continue to shape the narrative surrounding Assad's life in exile.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Daily Mirror logoDaily MirrorIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6012 days ago
Despot Assad is serving a life sentence - and he knows he can't trust Putin to protect him forever

The article discusses the current situation of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who is living in exile in a luxurious apartment in Moscow. Despite being sentenced to death in absentia for war crimes and crimes against humanity, Assad remains protected by Russia, though this protection may not last indefinitely. His successor, Ahmad al-Sharaa, has requested his extradition to Syria for trial, but this has been denied for now. The article highlights Assad's role in causing widespread violence and suffering in Syria, including the deaths of 620,000 Syrians and the displacement of 14 million people. It also notes that while Putin currently protects Assad, there may come a point where this support diminishes, especially as Russia seeks to maintain alliances and strategic interests in the region.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical view of Assad's actions, emphasizing the extensive human suffering caused by his regime, and frames Russia's continued support for Assad as potentially temporary due to geopolitical considerations. The tone is condemnatory toward Assad's leadership and highlights the

Why factuality (85): The article reports that Assad is serving a life sentence in a Moscow high-rise, which is not confirmed by any primary source. However, it aligns with the cross-source consensus that Assad was sentenced to death in absentia by a Syrian court. The claim about his studying ophthalmology and living in

Why objectivity (60): The tone is highly critical of Assad, using emotionally charged language like 'fallen ex-Syrian dictator' and '14 years of slaughter.' It also implies that Assad cannot trust Putin, suggesting a biased perspective rather than presenting facts neutrally.

iNews logoiNewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 6012 days ago
A Yeti hunter and turtle sex crimes – inside Putin’s bizarre sham election

Russia's Supreme Court ruled that the liberal opposition party Yabloko cannot participate in the September parliamentary elections, citing alleged foreign funding violations. This decision comes amid concerns that the elections, though heavily manipulated, serve as a facade for maintaining public legitimacy. The State Duma elections, which will take place from September 18–20, are expected to result in a victory for the ruling United Russia party, with other registered parties largely aligned with the government. Yabloko, which previously challenged the Kremlin's policies, was initially allowed to run but was later banned due to a perceived rise in online support. While the elections are widely seen as fraudulent, they still play a symbolic role in allowing limited public discourse and maintaining the illusion of democratic participation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Russian elections as inherently corrupt and controlled by the Kremlin, highlighting the suppression of genuine opposition like Yabloko. It emphasizes the manipulation of the electoral process and the lack of meaningful political competition, suggesting a systemic bias against

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that the Russian Supreme Court barred Yabloko from participating in the parliamentary elections, citing illegal foreign donations. It also mentions the general structure of the elections and the role of 'United Russia'. However, it lacks specific data or official state

Why objectivity (60): The tone is clearly critical of the Russian government and portrays the election as a 'sham', using emotionally charged language like 'bizarre sham election' and 'Kremlin seems to be scared'. This suggests a clear political bias towards the opposition and a lack of neutrality in presenting the facts

iNews logoiNewsIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 558 days ago
Putin is shielding exiled dictators – but some pay a bitter price

An article discusses how former leaders and political exiles, including Bashar al-Assad, find refuge under Vladimir Putin's protection in Russia. Following a death sentence against Assad in Syria, he is reported to reside in an affluent Moscow suburb with his family, engaging in leisure activities while avoiding public political engagement due to Kremlin restrictions. The piece highlights a pattern where Russia offers asylum and financial stability to ousted leaders in exchange for non-interference in domestic affairs. Examples include Viktor Yanukovych, Aslan Abashidze, and Askar Akayev, who have lived in Moscow's elite districts. The Assad family is noted to possess substantial assets in Moscow, valued at around $40 million, according to the Financial Times.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of Russia's policy toward political exiles, citing multiple examples and quoting experts like Mark Galeotti. It does not overtly favor one side politically but rather reports on the established practice of offering sanctuary to former leaders in exchange for庇

Why factuality (65): The article mentions the death sentence but adds unverified details about Assad's current life in Moscow, such as him playing video games and studying ophthalmology. These claims lack primary source support and are speculative. It also references a quote from Russia's ambassador to Iraq, which is no

Why objectivity (55): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'rogue’s gallery' and 'bitter price,' suggesting bias toward portraying Putin as protective of dictators. It also implies Assad is living comfortably in Moscow, which could be seen as sympathetic to him. The tone leans towards commentary rather than

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories